CHEMCATCHEM
FULL PAPERS
tion of aromatic ketoximes was performed at 1 atm of hydro-
gen or lower hydrogen pressure. However, at the referred hy-
drogen pressure (0.1 MPa),[5] no reduction of ketoxime 2a was
observed for the commercial Pd/Al2O3 even after 24 h. The in-
hibitive role for trifluoromethyl group could be attributed to
the high negative inductive effect that decreased the electron
density on C=N double bond of the ketoximes. Inspired by the
conclusion made by Niedermann and co-workers,[9] the hydro-
genation pressure was enhanced to 2.0 MPa and the reaction
was observed (Table 2, entry 1). In contrast, using ALD cata-
lysts, the hydrogenation reaction was completed within a very
short time at 1008C under 2.0 MPa. To achieve one-pot cas-
cade chemoenzymatic reactions, which are hydrogenation of
a-trifluoromethylated ketoximes followed by DKR of the inter-
mediate amines, hydrogen pressure was lowered to 0.1 MPa
and complete conversion was obtained (entry 2). The reaction
time and temperature were fur-
corresponding enantiopure amide (S)-3a in high yield and ex-
cellent ee (Table 3, entries 2 and 3). For economic benefit, ALD
Ni/Al2O3 was chosen and the optimal reaction conditions were
also applied to other substrates; the corresponding amides
were obtained with good yield (70–95%) and high enantio-
meric excess (90–99%, entries 5–7). However, at a hydrogen
pressure of 0.1 MPa, lower catalytic activity was observed with
relatively poor yield for the substrate 2b. Therefore, higher
pressure (0.15 MPa) and higher temperature (1008C) were ap-
plied to the hydrogenation step (entry 4). With regards to the
substrate 1 f, significant side reactions took place in hydroge-
nation of the ketoxime; therefore, lower pressure and tempera-
ture were used (entry 8). The results from Table 3 indicate that
both aromatic and aliphatic a-trifluoromethylated ketoximes
are good substrates toward the asymmetric reductive acylation
by the combination of ALD catalysts and lipase. Notably, the
ther reduced to match the con-
Table 3. Asymmetric transformations of a-trifluoromethylated ketoximes to chiral amides under optimized
conditions.
ditions required for DKR reac-
tions, and the results were also
satisfying. The results are consis-
tent with those reported by Par-
vulescu and co-workers for race-
mization of chiral amines[8] and
our group’s previous work for
DKR reactions.[4] However, if we
further brought down the hydro-
gen pressure, the reaction was
not complete with a significant
amount of substrate 2a left
(entry 6). Similar results were ob-
tained for the ALD-deposited
nickel NPs on Al2O3 or silica gel.
Entry[a] Substrates
Catalyst
H2 pressure [MPa]
Reduction[b] Acylation[c]
Yield [%][d] eeamide [%][e]
1
2
3
2a commercial Pd/Al2O3 2.00[f]
0.01
0.01
0.01
62
93
92
99
99
99
2a ALD Pd/Al2O3
2a ALD Ni/Al2O3
0.10
0.10
4
5
2b ALD Ni/Al2O3
2c ALD Ni/Al2O3
0.15[g]
0.10
0.01
0.01
78
82
98
98
One-pot chemoenzymatic syn-
thesis of optically active a-tri-
fluoromethylated amines
With the results from the sepa-
rate investigations on the DKR
and hydrogenation in hand, the
combination in a one-pot cas-
cade chemoenzymatic reaction
is feasible. For commercial cata-
lyst Pd/Al2O3, hydrogen pressure
should be turned down manual-
ly for acylation after reductive
process. To our satisfaction, with
ALD prepared catalysts, hydro-
gen was consumed during re-
duction reaction to the appropri-
ate pressure for the following
acylation.
6
7
2d ALD Ni/Al2O3
2e ALD Ni/Al2O3
0.10
0.10
0.01
0.01
81
70
98
99
8
9
2 f ALD Ni/Al2O3
2g ALD Ni/Al2O3
0.08[h]
0.10
0.01
0.01
85
95
99
90
[a] Reaction conditions: substrate ketoxime (0.1 mmol), IPAC (0.5 mmol), TEA (0.2 mmol), CAL-B (50 mg) and
nanocatalyst (0.001 mmol for reduction, 0.002 mmol for acylation) in dry toluene (1 mL) in the presence of 4 ꢁ
molecular sieve (100 mg) at 708C. [b] For 36 hr. [c] For 6 days. [d] Determined by GC using AT·SE-30 column.
[e] Determined by GC using chiral column. [f] Reduction for 48 hr. [g] Hydrogenation at 1008C. [h] Hydrogena-
tion at 608C.
With respect to the substrate
2a, different catalysts were used.
The ALD catalysts under opti-
mized conditions afforded the
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 2129 – 2133 2131