Full Paper
bound iodine azide.[17] Furthermore, the addition of an organo-
selenium species to the iodine(III)-azide combination was effec-
tive for the azido-selenation of various alkenes, including glu-
cals, presumably through the involvement of radical species.[18]
Although they need to be prepared beforehand, cyclic azido
benziodoxoles[5,19] can also act as azido donors in a wide array
of reactions with olefins. For instance, they have recently been
used for the zinc-catalyzed azidation of silyl enol ethers,[20] the
intermolecular[21] and intramolecular[22] oxyazidation of alkenes,
the copper-catalyzed oxoazidation of indoles,[23] and the aryl-
azidation of activated alkenes.[24]
acted as a superior promoter (entry 8), and it could also be
used with LiN3 (entries 9 and 10). This azide source was found
to be more convenient and robust to use than TMSN3, al-
though it was poorly soluble in CH2Cl2, but this could be over-
come by conducting the reaction in acetonitrile (entry 11).
Having found the optimal combination of reagents and sol-
vents, we then assessed the effect of the reaction temperature
on the efficiency and the stereoselectivity of the reaction (en-
tries 11–14). Accordingly, À158C was shown to offer the best
balance with respect to yield, reaction time, and diastereose-
lectivity (entry 13).
Based on our previous studies with enamides, we thought
that it would be more general and satisfying to develop a set
of conditions for the umpolung of pseudohalides that would
only differ by the nature of the salts.[25]
At this stage, we went on to explore the substrate scope of
the reaction. The benzylamine-derived enamide 1b reacted in
Table 2. Diazidation scope.
Results and Discussion
Building on our experience with halide salts, we initially aimed
to develop an ethoxy-azidation reaction. Unfortunately, the
Entry
SM[a]
R
PG
Time [h]
d.r.[b]
Yield [%][c]
[26]
combination of LiN3 or NaN3 with DIB in ethanol at various
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1 f
1g
1h
1i
Ph
Bn
Ph
Me
Ph
Bn
Ph
Bn
Ph
Ts
Ts
Ms
Bs[d]
Boc
Boc
Ac
1
1.25
1
1
1
1
1
1
80:20
90:10
70:30
75:25
ND
52
47
40
46
CM[e]
CM
18
61
43
temperatures led to either no conversion or to intractable mix-
tures, even after prolonged reaction times (Table 1, entries 1
and 2). Using trimethylsilylazide with DIB (entry 3) or with
iodosylbenzene (entry 4), or
a cyclic azido benziodoxole
ND
(entry 5) proved equally unsuccessful.
73:27
75:25
67:33
85:15
The more reactive PhenylIodine-bis(triFluoroAcetate)
(PIFA)[27] was found to be a suitable promoter when it was
used in conjunction with TMSN3 in dichloromethane to access
the bis-azido compound 5a in 19% yield (entry 6). Running
the reaction in acetonitrile did not help to improve the reactiv-
ity (entry 7), whereas bis(tert-butylcarbonyloxy)iodobenzene
Ac
COCF3
3
7[f]
10
1j
N-(Bs)-indole
24
[a] SM: starting material. [b] The relative stereochemistry of the major dia-
stereoisomer was attributed by analogy with 5a. ND: not determined.
[c] Yield of isolated product. [d] Bs: benzenesulfonyl. [e] CM: complex
mixture. [f] Additional 1 h at RT.
Table 1. Diazidation optimization.
a similar manner (Table 2, entry 2), as did the mesyl-
protected substrate 1c (entry 3) and the methyl-
amine derivative 1d (entry 4). The use of a carbamate
protecting group (Boc, entries 5 and 6) appeared in-
Entry
R
x
Y[a]
Solvent Temp. [8C] Time
d.r.[b] Yield [%][c]
compatible with this reaction, whereas amides (en-
tries 7–9) were well tolerated. Finally, the same condi-
tions were applied to N-benzenesulfonyl indole 1j to
give the desired product, after a prolonged reaction
time and with a mediocre 24% yield (entry 10).[12] It
should also be noted that aminoacrylates were found
to be unreactive under these conditions, even after
extended reaction times.
1
2
3
4
Ac
Ac
Ac
PhIO
2.0 Na
2.0 Li
1.5 TMS MeCN
1.2 TMS CH2Cl2 À50
EtOH
EtOH
À20
À40
RT
7 d
7 d
2 d
6 d
ND
ND
ND
ND
CM[d]
CM
CM
CM
5
1.9 EtOH
–
0 to RT 30 h to 5 d ND
CM
6
7
8
COCF3
COCF3
COtBu
COtBu
COtBu
COtBu
COtBu
COtBu
COtBu
1.2 TMS CH2Cl2
1.2 TMS MeCN
1.2 TMS CH2Cl2
1.2 Li
1.5 Li
1.5 Li
1.5 Li
1.5 Li
1.5 Li
RT
RT
RT
RT
RT
RT
0
À15
À40
15 min
15 min
1 h
1 h
1 h
25 min
25 min
1 h
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
70:30 52
80:20 42
80:20 52
19
8
27
21[e]
31
Overall, this process seemed to be quite capricious
and it was hampered by various side reactions, which
indicated the in situ generation of highly reactive in-
termediates, such as azido radicals, as previously
postulated.[14] The involvement of radical species
became apparent when trisubstituted pyrrolidine 6
was isolated as the main product, albeit in a modest
yield, from the reaction of allylamine-derived enam-
ide 1k (Scheme 2a). To account for the formation of
this compound, we postulated that a 5-exo-trig cycli-
9
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
10
11
12
13
14
24 h
ND
ND
[a] Entries 1–4, y=2x; entries 6–8, y=2.0; entries 9–14, y=4.0. [b] The relative stereo-
chemistry of the major diastereoisomer was determined by X-ray diffraction analysis
of a mono crystal of 5a.[28] ND: not determined. [c] Yield of isolated product. [d] CM:
complex mixture. [e] Reaction run with 3.0 equiv of NaHCO3.
Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 14205 – 14210
14206
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim