C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
intramolecular general base catalyzed addition mechanism. The
latter is a type of bifunctional catalysis that has been documented
extensively by Hine,14 and specifically in the formation of carbinol
amines by Page and Jencks.15 Whatever the origin, the selectivity
shown by 12 was clearly not maintained over time. In longer-term
(12-24 h) screening assays, there were smaller differences between
diamines 8 and 13-17 as each exhibited a higher degree of complex
formation. Several other diamines, including the cyclohexyl di-
amines and N-methylated diamines, achieved 30-60% of the signal
changes seen with 8 and 13-17.
Described herein is an approach to macromolecular hosts that
show rapid, selective, high affinity, two-point binding of straight-
chain diamine guests. Over longer times, the hosts are more
promiscuous, binding a broader range of diamines. However, the
binding site, made by cross-linking the two template-linked
dendrons, carrying 16 alkene groups each, does not arise from
template-mediated imprinting. This is in contrast to our previous
study wherein a porphyrin template holding 8 dendrons each with
8 alkenes produced an effective imprint. Current efforts are focused
on further defining the design rules for this monomolecular
imprinting approach and looking at new scaffolds that might be
generally applicable. It is clear that the integration of reporter units
as binding groups is a compelling advance because it allows rapid
screening of guests and small guest libraries. Reporter group-cored
dendrons for other functional groups are currently under develop-
ment.
Figure 1. Binding selectivity profile for 12.
) 500 M-1, Kapp(12) ) 1000 M-1), but this comparison is
complicated by the interaction between the dye sites.
The chromogenic response shown by 12 allowed its selectivity
profile to be established readily using a small library of amino and
alcoholic targets (Figure 1). A simple, qualitative screening assay
involved adding 1 equiv of each guest to a 20 µM solution of 12
in THF and measuring the increase in absorbance at λ ) 425 nm
(∆A425) 30 s after mixing.
Acknowledgment. Funding of this work by the National
Institutes of Health (GM61067) is gratefully acknowledged.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic details and ad-
ditional binding and characterization data (PDF). This material is
The remarkable level of selectivity for the straight-chain diamines
(e.g., 13-17, Figure 1), in particular for 8 and 14, suggests a cross-
linked dendrimer with an effectively imprinted binding site showing
a high degree of shape and functional group discrimination.
However, a key control experiment would be to show that the same
chemistry outlined in Scheme 1, but using a different diamine
template, ideally one weakly bound by 12, gives an imprinted
dendrimer with a different binding profile, in other words, to
demonstrate different cross-reactiVities for two dendrimers im-
printed with different templates. To apply this stringent test, a
second cross-linked dendrimer was synthesized from 1,3-bis(2-
azidoethyl)benzene.9 Rather than showing selective binding of its
template (i.e., 18), a diamine that was weakly bound by 12, this
new dendrimer showed a guest binding profile very similar to that
seen for 12 (Figure 1).9 In another control study, a third dendrimer
was prepared by treating 7 with 10 at a concentration that favors
formation of a cross-linked dimer. The dimer, purified by size
exclusion chromatography (SEC) and appearing identical to 12 by
1H NMR, MALDI-MS, and analytical SEC, also showed guest
binding properties similar to those of 12.
References
(1) Wulff, G. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 1-27. Haupt, K.; Mosbach, K. Chem.
ReV. 2000, 100, 2495-2504. Shea, K. J. Trends Polym. Sci. 1994, 2, 166-
173.
(2) Molecular and Ionic Recognition with Imprinted Polymers; ACS Sym-
posium Series 703; Bartsch, R. A., Maeda, M., Eds.; American Chemical
Society: Washington, DC, 1998. Davis, M. E.; Katz, A.; Ahmad, W. R.
Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 1820-1839.
(3) Zimmerman, S. C.; Wendland, M. S.; Rakow, N. A.; Zharov, I.; Suslick,
K. S. Nature 2002, 418, 399-403.
(4) Molecular recognition in dendrimers: Zimmerman, S. C.; Lawless, L. J.
Top. Curr. Chem. 2001, 217, 95-120. Baars, M. W. P. L.; Meijer, E. W.
Top. Curr. Chem. 2000, 210, 131-182. Smith, D. K.; Diederich, F. Top.
Curr. Chem. 2000, 210, 183-227.
(5) Ramstro¨m, O.; Ye, L.; Mosbach, K. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 471-477.
(6) For azobenzene-containing dendrimers, see: Villavicencio, O.; McGrath,
D. V. AdV. Dendritic Macromol. 2002, 5, 1-44 and references therein.
(7) Mohr, G. J.; Demuth, C.; Spichiger-Keller, U. E. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70,
3868-3873.
(8) Wendland, M. S.; Zimmerman, S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1389-
1390.
(9) See Supporting Information.
(10) MIPs using imines: Shea, K. J.; Stoddard, G. J.; Shavelle, D. M.; Wakui,
F.; Choate, R. M. Macromolecules 1990, 23, 4497-4507. Wulff, G.;
Heide, B.; Helfmeier, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 1089-1091.
(11) Gololobov, Y. G.; Zhmurova, I. N.; Kasukhin, L. F. Tetrahedron 1981,
37, 437-472.
Molecular modeling studies9 indicated a very open cross-linked
framework for 12 with sufficient flexibility to allow considerable
adjustment of the distance between azo dye units. Thus, the
selectivity for straight-chain diamines exhibited might reflect a
kinetic effect wherein diamines 8 and 14 bound rapidly because
they are the least sterically hindered and best able to employ an
(12) Trnka, T. M.; Grubbs, R. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 18-29.
(13) Tamborski, C.; Prabhu, U. D. G.; Eapen, K. C. J. Fluorine Chem. 1985,
28, 139-150. Saloutin, V. I.; Burgart, Y. V.; Kuzueva, O. G.; Kappe, C.
O.; Chupakhin, O. N. J. Fluorine Chem. 2000, 103, 17-23.
(14) Hine, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1978, 11, 1-7.
(15) Page, M. I.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 8818-8827.
JA0294515
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 12, 2003 3425