Syntheses of Ta(V) Complexes
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 35, No. 11, 1996 3233
deuterated solvent signal as a secondary reference. 1H NMR chemical
shifts are reported at ambient probe temperature, 18 °C, unless otherwise
indicated. Mass spectra were obtained on a VG Analytical 7070 EQ-
HF mass spectrometer.
ether with vigorous stirring. An immediate color change from orange
to brown with the formation of a pale precipitate (LiCl) occurred. The
solution was stirred for 2.5 h and filtered through Celite. The brown
filtrate was concentrated in vacuo and cooled at -20 °C for 36 h giving
brown-green crystals of 5 in 29% yield. 1H NMR with tentative
assignments (C6D6): δ 8.20, 7.71 (2d, each 1H, J ) 8 Hz, ind); 8.08,
6.71 (2d, each 1H, J ) 3 Hz, ind); 7.30 (m, 2H, ind); 1.85, 1.33 (2s,
each 6H, TMP); 0.95 (br s, 3H, TaMe); 0.86 (br s, 6H, TaMe2). At
-19 °C, two sharp Ta-Me resonances were observed at 0.92 and 0.79
ppm. Their coalescence temperature was 38 °C. 13C NMR (C6D6): δ
143.8, 134.9, 134.3, 132.6, 130.7, 122.5, 121.9, 120.6, 116.7 (TMP
and ind aromatics); 73.2 (s, TaMe); 64.6 (s, TaMe2); 14.3, 9.8 (2s,
TMP-Me). MS (CI-): m/z 464 (P). (EI+): m/z 449 (P-Me). HR
MS (CI-): Calcd m/z 464.1648. Found: m/z 464.1609.
X-ray Diffraction Study of (η5-NC4Me4)TaMe3(indolyl) (5).
Crystals suitable for diffraction were grown from a saturated Et2O
solution of 5 cooled at 253 K for 72 h. A sample of crystals was placed
under Apiezon T grease. The datum crystal was mounted on a glass
fiber and quickly placed in the 233 K N2 stream of a locally-modified
Nicolet LT-2 apparatus on a Nicolet R3 diffractometer. Data were
collected to a Data General Nova 4/C minicomputer.
Structure solution and refinement were performed on the DEC
microVAX 3200 in the X-ray laboratory at the University of California
at Davis using the SHELX suite of programs. All non-hydrogen atoms
were refined with anisotropic thermal parameters. Data were corrected
for absorption. Largest residuals in the final difference map were
e1.075 e‚Å-3 and were located unreasonably close to the two Ta
centers. These were dismissed as absoprtion artifacts.
Hydrogen atoms were placed at calculated distances and allowed to
ride on the position of the parent atom. The isotropic themal parameter
was modeled to ride as 1.2 times the equivalent isotropic thermal
parameter of the parent atom. No notable intermolecular contacts were
observed.
Synthesis of (η5-NC4Me4)TaMe3Cl (1). TaMe3Cl2 (0.945 g, 3.18
mmol) with a small impurity of TaMe2Cl3 (ca. 10%) was dissolved in
100 mL of diethyl ether. This solution was transferred into a suspension
of (tetramethylpyrrolyl)lithium (0.406 g, 3.15 mmol) in 30 mL of diethyl
ether with vigorous stirring. A rapid color change from pale yellow
to orange occurred with the formation of a pale precipitate (LiCl). The
solution was stirred for 1 h and filtered through a bed of Celite. The
orange filtrate was then concentrated in vacuo and kept at -20 °C for
48 h giving orange crystals of 1 in 42% yield. 1H NMR (C6D6): δ
2.03, 1.30 (s, 6H, TMP); 1.00 (s, 9H, TaMe). At -43 °C, two sharp
Ta-Me resonances were resolved at 0.77 and 1.03 ppm. Their
coalescence temperature was -17.5 °C. 13C NMR (C6D6): δ 137.3,
132.9 (s, TMP); 71.6 (br s, TaMe); 15.0, 9.9 (TMP-Me). MS (CI-):
m/z 383 (P). (EI+): m/z 368 (P-Me), 353 (P-2Me). HR MS (CI-):
Calcd m/z 383.0843. Found: m/z 383.0848.
A minor impurity in the product (ca. 10%) was identified as (η5-
NC4Me4)TaMe2Cl2 (2). This complex probably arises from the reaction
of TaMe2Cl3 (vida supra) with the Li-pyrrolyl reagent. The same
complex can also be prepared in about 30% yield from the reaction of
TaMe3Cl2 with neutral tetramethylpyrrole. 1H NMR (C6D6): δ 2.12,
1.36 (2 s, 6H, TMP); 1.09 (s, 6H TaMe).
X-ray Diffraction Study of (η5-NC4Me4)TaMe2Cl2. Orange
crystals of 2 were obtained from a saturated Et2O solution of a mixture
of 1 and 2 cooled at 253 K for 48 h. A suitable crystal was coated
with Apiezon T grease, and data were collected at 193 K on a Siemens
P3/F diffractometer. Axial photographs indicated orthorhombic sym-
metry, and the centered settings of 25 intense reflections with 2Θ values
between 24.0° and 50.0° gave the unit cell dimensions listed in Table
5. A Patterson map gave the location of the Ta atom at a site of
crystallographic mirror symmetry. Phases derived from the location
of the Ta gave positions of other atoms of the structure. From
differences in electron density and bond length to the Ta, it was possible
to clearly differentiate between the coordinated chloro and methyl
carbon atoms. ψ scans recorded at the conclusion of data collection
were used to obtain an absorption profile, and an empirical correction
for absorption was applied to the data. Crystal data, data collection
parameters, and results of the analysis are given in Table 3.
Formation of (η5-NC4Me4)TaMe3(StBu). Complex 1 (12 mg, 3.1
× 10-2 mmol) and LiStBu (3 mg, 3 × 10-2 mmol) were placed in an
NMR tube connected to a Schlenk adapter. C6D6 (0.8 mL) was added
to the reaction vessel, the mixture was frozen at -196 °C, and the
vessel was evacuated. The NMR tube was then flame sealed and
thawed to room temperature. An immediate reaction occurred, and a
pale precipitate (LiCl) formed. The yellow benzene-soluble product
1
formed in quantitative yield by H NMR, but all attempts to isolate
Synthesis of (η5-NC4Me4)TaMe4 (3). Complex 1 (108 mg, 0.28
mmol) was dissolved in 10 mLof diethyl ether. 1.2 M MeLi in diethyl
ether (0.235 mL, 0.28 mmol) was added dropwise with stirring. An
immediate color change from orange to green with the formation of a
gray precipitate (LiCl) occurred. The solution was stirred for 30 min
and filtered through Celite. The dark green filtrate was concentrated
in vacuo and cooled at -20 °C for 18 h giving dark green, crystalline
3 in 49% yield. 1H NMR (C6D6): δ 2.00, 1.31 (s, 6H, TMP); 0.83 (s,
12H, TaMe). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 134.9, 132.2 (s, TMP); 73.1 (s,
TaMe); 14.7, 10.2 (TMP-Me). MS(CI-): m/z 363 (P). (EI+): m/z
348 (P-Me), 332 (P-2Me). HR MS (CI-): Calcd m/z 363.1389.
Found: m/z 363.1385.
Synthesis of (η5-NC4Me4)TaMe3(NC4H4) (4). Complex 1 (470 mg,
1.23 mmol) was dissolved in 100 mL of diethyl ether and added to a
suspension of pyrrolyllithium (90 mg, 1.23 mmol) in 50 mL of diethyl
ether with vigorous stirring. The solution was stirred at room
temperature for 3.5 h and filtered through a bed of Celite. The solvent
was removed from the resultant yellow filtrate in vacuo leaving a yellow
oil. The oil was extracted with hexanes, and the extract was filtered
and concentrated in vacuo. The solution was cooled at -78 °C for 18
h giving the yellow crystalline product 4 in 65% yield. 1H NMR
(C6D6): δ 7.48, 6.60 (2 m, each 2Η, pyrr); 1.87, 1.32 (2 s, each 6H,
TMP); 0.82 (br s, 9H, TaMe). At -40 °C, two Ta-Me resonances
were resolved at 0.79 and 0.67 ppm. Their coalescence temperature
was 18.5 °C. 13C NMR (C6D6): δ 135.0, 130.6 (s, TMP); 127.3, 111.6
(s, pyrr); 73.3 (s, TaMe); 66.2 (s, TaMe2); 14.6, 9.8 (TMP). MS (CI-):
m/z 414 (P). (EI+): m/z 399 (P-Me), 348 (P-pyrr). HR MS (CI-):
Calcd m/z 414.1498. Found: m/z 414.1507.
and purify the compound on a larger scale led to decomposition of the
product. 1H NMR (C6D6): δ 2.15, 1.34 (2s, each 6H, TMP); 1.60 (s,
9H, StBu); 0.95 (s, 9H, TaMe).
Formation of (η5-NC4Me4)TaMe3(dmpt) (dmpt ) 2,6-dimethyl-
benzenethiolate). Complex 1 (10 mg, 3 × 10-2 mmol) and lithium
2,6-dimethylbenzenethiolate (4 mg, 3 × 10-2 mmol) were placed in
an NMR tube connected to a Schlenk adapter. 0.8 mL of C6D6 was
added to the reaction vessel, the mixture was frozen at -196 °C, and
the vessel was evacuated. The NMR tube was then flame sealed and
thawed to room temperature. An immediate color change from pale
orange to red-orange occurred with the formation of a pale precipitate
(LiCl). The initial conversion to (η5-NC4Me4)TaMe3(dmpt) was 71%
by 1H NMR, but the compound showed significant decomposition after
1 day in solution at room temperature. The complex decomposed when
isolation and purification were attempted. 1H NMR (C6D6): δ 7.08
(d, 2H, SPhMe2); 6.90 (t, 1H, SPhMe2); 2.85 (s, 6H, SPhMe2); 1.91,
1.24 (2s, each 6H, TMP); 0.72 (s, 9H, TaMe).
Thermal Decomposition of (η5-NC4Me4)TaMe3(NC4H4) (4). In
a typical experiment complex 4 (15 mg, 0.036 mmol) was dissolved
in 0.6 mL of C6D6, the solution was degassed in two freeze-pump-
thaw cycles, and the NMR tube was flame sealed under vacuum. The
reaction was monitored by NMR at room temperature. The decomposi-
tion product (η5-NC4Me4)TaMe2(NC4H4)2 (6) grew in slowly over the
1
course of 44 days, and at this time the yield of 6 was 27% (by H
NMR). Resonances for other tantalum products were not observed.
1H NMR (C6D6): δ 7.00, 6.43 (2m, each 4H, pyrr); 1.73, 1.35 (2s,
each 6H, TMP); 0.91 (s, 6H, TaMe). 13C NMR (C6D6): δ 138.0, 133.5
(TMP); 130.2, 113.5 (pyrr); 67.3 (TaMe); 13.4, 10.0 (TMP-Me). MS
(CI-): m/z 465 (M).
Thermal Decomposition of (η5-NC4Me4)TaMe3(indolyl) (5). Com-
plex 5 (15 mg, 0.032 mmol) was dissolved in 0.6 mL of C6D6, the
Synthesis of (η5-NC4Me4)TaMe3(indolyl) (5). Complex 1 (218 mg,
0.57 mmol) was dissolved in 15 mL of diethyl ether and added to a
suspension of indolyllithium (70 mg, 0.57 mmol) in 15 mL of diethyl