antioxidant and free-radical scavengers,8 and the efficient
metal-ion coordinating properties.9 It should be remembered
here that the 1,2-dithiolane ring system represents the key
structural feature on which the reactivity of relevant bio-
molecules such as that of lipoic acid (1, Figure 1), the
Scheme 1
Figure 1. Structure of 1,2-dithiolane derivatives: naturally oc-
curring R-enantiomer of 1,2-dithiolane-3-pentanoic acid (lipoic acid,
1); 4-amino-1,2-dithiolan-4-carboxylic acid (Adt, 2); (S)-2-amino-
3-(1,2-dithiolan-4-yl)-propionic acid (Adp, 3).
essential cofactor in the oxidative decarboxylation of R-
ketoacids, is based.9,10
An alternative approach (see Scheme 2), which follows
in part the route previously used to prepare (S)-5,5′-
dihydroxyleucine,14 was then adopted.
On the basis of the above-reported considerations and by
considering the absence of information on the chemistry of
peptidomimetics incorporating 1,2-dithiolane heterocyclics,
we recently began a research program centered on the study
of this topic. The CR,R-tetrasubstituted and achiral residue
of 4-amino-1,2-dithiolane-4-carboxylic acid (Adt, 2) was
chosen as an initial model and the conformational and bio-
chemical consequences of its insertion into bioactive oligo-
peptides have been described.11,12 As a continuation of these
studies we report here the stereocontrolled synthesis of the
N- and C-protected derivatives of (S)-2-amino-3-(1,2-dithi-
olan-4-yl)propionic acid (Adp, 3) and its 1,3-dithiolic form
14. The Adp molecule represents the first example of chiral
an R-amino acid containing a cyclic disulfide in its side chain.
The use of the malonic precursor, obtained from (S)-
pyroglutamic acid or (S)-serine derivatives, as depicted in
Scheme 1, was initially considered a suitable approach to
prepare 3. However, the regioselective reduction of this
compound was found to be sluggish and gave complex
reaction mixtures. Difficulties during the reduction of N-
protected γ-carboxy glutamyl derivatives analogous to that
reported in Scheme 1 have already been noted by Dubois et
al.13 and are attributable, at least in part, to the participation
of the urethane NH and formation of pyrrolidine derivatives.
tert-Butyl (S)-N-tert-butoxycarbonylpyroglutamate 6 was
used as the starting material.15 This was converted in high
yield into the enaminone 7 by using tert-butoxy-bis(dim-
ethylamino)methane (Bredereck’s reagent).16 The NaBH3-
CN reduction of the intermediate aldehyde 8, obtained by
acidic hydrolysis of 7, at a pH value between 3.5 and 4.0,
afforded a diastereoisomeric mixture of cis and trans alcohols
9 with improvement of the yield and shortening of the
reaction time as compared with the original protocol.14 The
mixture of the alcohols was then hydrolyzed using aqueous
LiOH in THF, and the resulting hydroxy acid 10 was
regioselectively reduced after conversion into the corre-
sponding mixed anhydride and in situ treatment with NaBH4.
The synthesis of the dimesylate 12 was followed by treatment
with potassium thiolacetate to give the bis-mercaptoacetyl
derivative 13 in 85% combined yields. Aqueous alkaline
hydrolysis of 13 at 0 °C afforded the (S)-5,5′-dimercapto-
leucine derivative 1417 whose iodine oxidation furnished
(13) Dubois, J.; Foure`s, C.; Bory, S.; Falcou, S.; Gaudry, M.; Marquet,
A. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 1001.
(14) August, R. A.; Khan, J. A.; Moody, C. M.; Young, D. W. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 507.
(15) Protection as the N-Boc tert-butyl ester allows a regioselective
hydrolysis during the ring-opening step and preserves the stereochemical
integrity of the R-center (see: August, R. A.; Khan, J. A.; Moody, C. M.;
Young, D. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4617).
(6) Concerning nucleophilic reactions at the sulfur atoms, it should be
noted (see: Schmidt, U.; Grafen, P.; Goedde, H. W. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1965, 4, 846) that the ground state of the1,2-dithiolane ring system
(valence angle at the S atom, 92°; S-S bond length, 2.1 Å) is much more
similar geometrically to the transition state than is the ground state of an
open chain disulfide (valence angle at S, 107°; S-S distance, 2.05 Å).
(7) Singh, R.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6304.
(8) (a) Packer, L.; Witt, E. H.; Tritschler, H. J. Free Radical Biol. Med.
1995, 19, 227. (b) Haenen, G. R. M. M.; Bast, A. Biochem. Pharmacol.
1991, 42, 2244.
(9) (a) Sigel, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1982, 21, 389. (b) Lodge,
J. K.; Traber, M. G.; Packer, L. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1998, 25, 287.
(10) Reed, L. J. ComprehensiVe Biochemistry 1966, 14, 99.
(11) Morera, E.; Nalli, M.; Pinnen, F.; Rossi, D.; Lucente, G. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 1585.
(16) Bredereck, H.; Simchen, G.; Rebsdat, S.; Kantlehner, W.; Horn,
P.; Wahl, R.; Hoffmann, H.; Grieshaber, P. Chem. Ber. 1968, 101, 41.
(17) (S)-N-Boc-5,5′-dimercaptoleucine tert-Butyl Ester (14). A solution
of bis-thioacetate derivative 13 (0.135 g, 0.31 mmol) in degassed EtOH (2
mL) was treated with 0.93 mL of aqueous 1 N NaOH at 0 °C for 1 h. The
mixture was neutralized with 2 N HCl and extracted with CH2Cl2. The
organic phase, washed with water, dried, and evaporated at room temper-
ature, gave an oily residue of pure 14 (0.108 g, 99%). [R]D +9° (c ) 2.0;
1
CHCl3); IR (CHCl3) 3434, 2981, 1706, 1501, 1369, 1236, 1153 cm-1; H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.24 (m, 1H, SHA), 1.32 (t, 1H, J ) 8.5 Hz,
SHB), 1.44 and 1.47 (2 × s, 18H, 2 × tert-butyl), 1.65 (m, 1H, â-CHA),
1.87 (m, 2H, â-CHB and γ-CH), 2.70 and 2.82 (2 × m, 4H, 2 × CH2S),
(12) Morera, E.; Lucente, G.; Ortar, G.; Nalli, M.; Mazza, F.; Gavuzzo,
E.; Spisani, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 147.
1140
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 7, 2002