5408
Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 5408-5409
A Homoleptic Thioether Coordination Sphere That Supports Nickel(I)
Pinghua Ge,† Charles G. Riordan,*,† Glenn P. A. Yap,‡ and Arnold L. Rheingold‡
Departments of Chemistry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, and University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716
ReceiVed May 9, 1996
Certain hydrogenases ([NiFe]H2ase) and carbon monoxide
dehydrogenase (CODH) are nickel-containing enzymes found
in methanogenic, sulfate-reducing, and acetogenic bacteria that
catalyze the oxidation of H2, reduction of H+ and CO oxidation,
acetyl-CoA synthesis, respectively.1 While the designed role
for each is distinct, the primary coordination sphere about Ni
in each is predominantly (or solely) sulfur ligation. The
structure of the [NiFe]H2ase from DesulfoVibrio gigas, recently
determined by X-ray methods, revealed the Ni to be coordinated
to four cysteines in a distorted geometry.2 In CODH, there are
two catalytically distinct, yet structurally similar, Ni sites,
clusters A and C, in which the average Ni environment as
deduced from Ni EXAFS is S4 or N(O)2-3S2.3 Our current
mechanistic understanding of these enzymes suggests that during
catalysis the Ni cycles through the Ni(I) oxidation state.1 The
reduction from Ni(II) occurs at E1/2 ) -235 mV for [NiFe]H2-
ase (Ni-C) and at E1/2 ) -541 mV for CODH (NiFeC).4
While low molecular weight complexes have modeled the Ni-
(II/III) redox couple in an S-only environment, to our knowledge
there is no example of a homoleptic NiIISx system that yields a
stable NiISx homologue upon chemical reduction.5,6 Our
understanding of these nickel-containing metalloenzymes would
be greatly enhanced by the synthesis and characterization of
model complexes that stabilize the +1 oxidation state in a sulfur-
only ligation sphere. This account details our successful efforts
toward stabilizing Ni(I) in such a coordination environment
using poly((methylthio)methyl)borates as monoanionic chelates.7
Reaction of 2 equiv of [Bu4N]Ph2Bt8 with Ni(BF4)2‚6H2O
in acetone resulted in precipitation of a deep red solid, [Ph2-
Bt]2Ni, 1, in 55% yield, eq 1. Electronic and 1H NMR
2[Bu4N][Ph2Bt] + Ni(BF4)2‚6H2O f
+ 2[Bu N][BF ] (1)
[Ph2Bt]2Ni
4
4
1
spectroscopies9 were consistent with a square planar structure
(S ) 0), which was confirmed by X-ray diffraction.10 The
molecular structure of 1 is depicted in Figure 1. The Ni ion
resides on a crystallographic inversion center which renders
trans thioethers metrically equivalent and ensures a planar
ligation sphere. The Ni-S distances of 2.200(1) and 2.240(1)
Å are similar to the Ni-Seq distance observed in the D. gigas
[NiFe]H2ase structure (average of 3 Ni-Seq ) 2.25 Å, Ni-Sax
) 2.6 Å)2 and in one of the Ni EXAFS studies on CODH (2.23
Å).3 The bond lengths are also consistent with other Ni(II)-
S(thioether) distances in square planar geometries and are ca.
0.1 Å longer than Ni(II)-S(thiolate) bond lengths.11 The bite
angle of the borate chelate is slightly less than ideal: S(1)-
Ni-S(2) ) 86.31(4)°. The six-membered chelate ring resides
in a twisted-boat conformation which orients one of the CH3
groups (C(15)) essentially perpendicular to the S4 plane
(displacement from S4 plane 1.66 Å) while the other (C(16))
lies nearly in the S4 plane (displacement from S4 plane 0.11
Å). This disposition of the chelate places the phenyl substituents
in distinct positions. One (Pheq) is directed away from the Ni,
while the other (Phax) is located directly above the NiS4 plane.
This latter orientation results in phenyl canopies protecting the
open axial coordination sites with the Phax centroid-Ni distance
equal to 3.79 Å. A similar placement of pseudoaxial Ph groups
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
† Kansas State University.
‡ University of Delaware.
(1) (a) Ragsdale, S. W. Crit. ReV. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1991, 26, 261-
300. (b) Lancaster, J. R., Ed. The Bioinorganic Chemistry of Nickel;
VCH Publishers: New York, 1988; Chapters 8-10.
(2) Volbeda, A.; Charon, M.-H.; Piras, C.; Hatchikian, E. C.; Frey, M.;
Fontecilla-Camps, J. C. Nature 1995, 373, 580-587. The authors
describe the Ni coordination sphere as neither square planar nor
tetrahedral.
(3) (a) Cramer, S. P.; Pan, W.-H.; Eidness, M. K.; Morton, T.; Ragsdale,
S. W.; Der Vartanian, D. V.; Ljungdahl, L. G.; Scott, R. A. Inorg.
Chem. 1987, 26, 2477-2479. (b) Bastian, N. R.; Diekert, G.;
Niederhoffer, E. C.; Teo, B.-K.; Walsh, C. T.; Orme-Johnson, W. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5581-5582. (c) Xia, J.; Dong, J.; Wang,
S.; Scott, R. A.; Lindahl, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7065-
7070.
(7) (a) Ge, P.; Haggerty, B.; Rheingold, A. L.; Riordan, C. G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8406-8407. (b) Ohrenberg, C.; Ge, P.;
Schebler, P.; Riordan, C. G.; Yap, G. P. A.; Rheingold, A. L. Inorg.
Chem. 1996, 35, 749-754. (c) Ohrenberg, C.; Saleem, M. M.; Riordan,
C. G.; Yap, G. P. A.; Verma, A. K.; Rheingold, A. L. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1996, 1081-1082.
(4) For potentials vs NHE, see for example: (a) Coremans, J. M. C. C.;
van der Zwaan, J. W.; Albracht, S. P. J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1989,
997, 256-267. (b) Gorst, C. M.; Ragsdale, S. W. J. Biol. Chem. 1991,
266, 20687-20693.
(8) Abbreviations: Ph2Bt-, diphenylbis((methylthio)methyl)borate; [14]-
aneS4, 1,4,8,11-tetrathiacyclotetradecane; tmc, 1,4,8,11-tetramethyl-
1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane.
(5) For an example of a NiIIS4 complex which is stable to electrochemical
reduction, see: Yamamura, T.; Sakurai, S.; Arai, H.; Miyamae, H. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 1656-1658.
(9) 1H NMR (CDCl3, 27 °C): δ 7.26 (br, o-H, 8 H), 7.20 (t, m-H, 8 H),
7.06 (t, p-H, 4 H), 1.82 (s, CH3SCH2, 20 H). UV-vis (CH2Cl2), λmax
(ꢀ, M-1 s-1): 354 (7300), 412 (7800), 510 (sh) nm. Anal. Calcd for
1 (C32H40B2NiS4): C, 60.70; H, 6.37; S, 20.25. Found: C, 60.49; H,
6.17; S, 19.85.
(6) For examples of Ni(I) complexes with other chromophores see the
following. NiIN4: (a) Ram, M. S.; Riordan, C. G.; Ostrander, R.;
Rheingold, A. L. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 5884-5892. (b) Szalda, D.
J.; Fujita, E.; Sanzenbacher, R.; Paulus, H.; Elias, H. Inorg. Chem.
1994, 33, 5855-5863. (c) Suh, M. P.; Kang, S.; Goedken, V. L.; Park,
S. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 360-365. (d) Lahiri, G. K.; Schussel, L.
J.; Stolzenberg, A. M. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 4991-5000. NiIS3N2:
(e) Marganian, C. A.; Vazir, H.; Baidya, N.; Olmstead, M. M.;
Mascharak, P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 1584-1594. (f)
Baidya, N.; Olmstead, M. M.; Mascharak, P. K. Inorg. Chem. 1991,
30, 929-937. NiIN2S2: (g) Farmer, P. J.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Lindahl,
P. A.; Darensbourg, M. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4665-4674.
NiINS3C: (h) Stavropoulos, P.; Muetterties, M. C.; Carrie´, M.; Holm,
R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8485-8492. NiIN5: (i) Suh, M.
P.; Oh, K. Y.; Lee, J. W.; Bae, Y. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
777-783.
(10) Crystal data for 1: C32H40B2NiS4; red block, monoclinic, P21/n, a )
10.3144(9) Å, b ) 9.365(2) Å, c ) 16.7929(12) Å, â ) 107.624(9)°,
V ) 7242(3) Å3, Z ) 2. The structure was solved using direct methods,
completed by subsequent difference Fourier syntheses, and refined
by full-matrix least-squares procedures. Semiempirical absorption
corrections were not required because of the <10% variation in the
integrated ψ-scan intensities. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined
with anisotropic displacement coefficients. Hydrogen atoms were
treated as idealized contributions. The final residuals for 178 variables
refined against 2006 unique reflections were R(F) ) 4.04% and Rw-
(F2) ) 8.53%.
(11) Halcrow, M. A.; Christou, G. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 2421-2481.
S0020-1669(96)00515-0 CCC: $12.00 © 1996 American Chemical Society