[D-Pro10]Dynorphin A-(1-11) Analogues
J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1997, Vol. 40, No. 17 2739
(4) Turcotte, A.; Lalonde, J .-M.; St.-Pierre, S.; Lemaire, S. Dynor-
phin-(1-13). I. Structure-Function Relationships of Ala-
Containing Analogs. Int. J . Pept. Protein Res. 1984, 23, 361-
367.
(5) Shaw, J . S.; Miller, L.; Turnbull, M. J .; Gormley, J . J .; Morley,
J . S. Selective Antagonists at the Opiate Delta-Receptor. Life
Sci. 1982, 31, 1259-1262.
(6) Pert, C. B.; Bowie, D. L.; Pert, A.; Morell, J . L.; Gross, E. Agonist-
Antagonist Properties of N-Allyl-[D-Ala]2-Met-enkephalin. Na-
ture (London) 1977, 269, 73-75.
(7) Gairin, J . E.; Mazarguil, H.; Alvinerie, P.; Botanch, C.; Cros, J .;
Meunier, J .-C. N,N-Diallyl-tyrosyl Substitution Confers Antago-
nist Properties on the κ-Selective Opioid Peptide [D-Pro10]-
Dynorphin A(1-11). Br. J . Pharmacol. 1988, 95, 1023-1030.
(8) Lemaire, S.; Parent, P.; Lapierre, C.; Michelot, R. N,N-Dially-
lated Analogs of Dynorphin A-(1-13) as Potent Antagonists for
the Endogenous Peptide and Selective κ Opioid Analgesics. In
International Narcotics Research Conference (INRC) ‘89; Quirion,
R., J hamandas, K., Gianoulakis, C., Eds.; Alan R. Liss, Inc.: New
York, 1990; Vol. 328, pp 77-80.
(9) Gairin, J . E.; Gouarderes, C.; Mazarguil, H.; Alvinerie, P.; Cros,
J . [D-Pro10]Dynorphin-(1-11) is a Highly Potent and Selective
Ligand for κ Opioid Receptors. Eur. J . Pharmacol. 1985, 106,
457-458.
(10) Choi, H.; Murray, T. F.; DeLander, G. E.; Caldwell, V.; Aldrich,
J . V. N-Terminal Alkylated Derivatives of [D-Pro10]dynorphin
A-(1-11) are Highly Selective for κ-Opioid Receptors. J . Med.
Chem. 1992, 35, 4638-4639.
(11) Cheung, S. T.; Benoiton, L. N. N-Methylamino Acids in Peptide
Synthesis. V. The Synthesis of N-tert-Butyloxycarbonyl,N-me-
thylamino Acids by N-Methylation. Can. J . Chem. 1977, 55,
906-910.
termination of the IC50 of Dyn A-(1-13)NH2 in the absence of
the N,N-diallyl derivative, each tissue was incubated with 10
µM of the N,N-diallyl peptide for 10 min followed by treatment
with a single dose of Dyn A-(1-13)NH2. This method was used
due to the gradual decline in twitch height with time following
treatment with the N,N-diallyl derivative. Naloxone antago-
nism (naloxone pA2) was measured by the standard procedure.
Various concentrations of naloxone were incubated in the bath
for 20 min before redetermination of the IC50 of the test
peptides. All Schild analyses24 were performed using a
computerized pharmacologic data analysis system.25
The MVD assay was performed by Stanford Research
Institute as follows: the vas deferens from Swiss-Webster mice
(30-35 g) were prepared as described by Hughes et al.26 The
tissues were mounted in an 8 mL, 31 °C organ bath containing
a magnesium-free Krebs solution, which was bubbled with a
mixture of oxygen and carbon dioxide (95:5). An initial tension
of 150-200 mg was used. The field stimulation parameters
were modified slightly from those described by Ro´nai et al.;27
paired shocks of 100 ms delay between supramaximal rect-
angular pulses of 1 ms duration were delivered at a rate of
0.1 Hz. A Grass S-88 electrostimulator was used for stimula-
tion. The concentrations were recorded using an isometric
transducer (Metrigram) coupled to a Grass 7D multichannel
polygraph. The agonist potency was determined as described
in the GPI assay.
In Vivo An tin ocicep tive a n d An ta gon ist Deter m in a -
tion . Selected compounds were investigated for in vivo
antinociceptive and possible antagonist activity by observing
the phenylquinone abdominal stretching response. Male CF1
mice (Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Wilmington, MA),
weighing 18-22 g at the time of testing, were housed a
minimum of 6 days under carefully controlled environmental
conditions (22.2 ( 1.1 °C; 50% average humidity; 12 h lighting
cycle/24 h). Mice were fasted overnight (16-22 h) prior to
testing (unfasted mice were used for antagonist activity
determinations). For observation of stretching responses, mice
were placed in individual clear plastic cages (13 cm long × 9
cm wide × 12.5 cm deep) with hinged clear plastic lids and
wire screen bottoms arranged in units of 30 on a 20° incline.
Randomized and coded doses of test compounds were admin-
istered by intracerebroventricular (icv) injection in a volume
of 5 µL/mouse. Observation times represent the period from
drug administration to the start of the observation period; the
phenylquinone challenge dose (1.25 mg/kg ip phenyl-p-benzo-
quinone) was injected in a volume of 0.25 mL/20 g at 5 min
prior to the specified observation time. The concentration of
phenylquinone solution was 0.1 mg/mL in 5% aqueous ethanol.
For scoring purposes a “stretch” was indicated by whole body
stretching or full contraction of the abdomen. Mice were
observed for 10 min for the presence or absence of the
characteristic abdominal contraction and stretching response,
beginning 5 min after the phenylquinone injection. Antinoci-
ception was indicated by a complete blockade of the stretching
response. Greater than 95% of the control (vehicle-treated)
mice are expected to exhibit a stretching response. Antinoci-
ceptive activity was calculated as the percentage of mice failing
to respond to the phenylquinone challenge dose. ED50 values
were determined by the moving averages method28 and
statistical significance determined by ø2 analysis.
(12) Castro, B.; Dormoy, J .-R.; Evin, G.; Selve, C. Reactifs de
Couplage Peptidique IV (1)-L’hexafluorophosphate de Benzot-
riazolyl N-Oxytrisdimethylamino Phosphonium (B.O.P.). Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1975, 1219-1222.
(13) Hudson, D. Methodological Implications of Simultaneous Solid-
Phase Peptide Synthesis. 1. Comparison of Different Coupling
Procedures. J . Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 617-624.
(14) Robson, L. E.; Foote, R. W.; Maurer, R.; Kosterlitz, H. W. Opioid
Binding Sites of the κ-Type in Guinea Pig Cerebellum. Neuro-
science 1984, 12, 621-627.
(15) Gillan, M. G. C.; Kosterlitz, H. W. Spectrum of the µ-, δ- and
κ-Binding Sites in Homogenates of Rat Brain. Br. J . Pharmacol.
1982, 77, 461-469.
(16) Soderstrom, K.; Choi, H.; Aldrich, J . V.; Murray, T. F. N-
Alkylated Derivatives of [D-Pro10]Dynorphin A-(1-11) are High
Affinity Partial Agonists at the Cloned Rat κ-Opioid Receptor,
submitted.
(17) Lung, F.-D. T.; Meyer, J .-P.; Li, G.; Lou, B.-S.; Stropova, D.;
Davis, P.; Yamamura, H. I.; Porreca, F.; Hruby, V. J . Highly κ
Receptor-Selective Dynorphin A Analogues with Modifications
in Position 3 of Dynorphin A(1-11)-NH2. J . Med. Chem. 1995,
38, 585-586.
(18) Choi, H.; Aldrich, J . V. Comparison of Methods for the Fmoc
Solid-Phase Synthesis and Cleavage of a Peptide Containing
Both Tryptophan and Arginine. Int. J . Pept. Protein Res. 1993,
42, 58-63.
(19) NMR data for N-monoalkylated tyrosine derivatives could not
be obtained due to their insolubility in any solvent except DMA.
(20) Stewart, J . M.; Young, J . D. Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis, 2nd
ed.; Pierce Chemical Co.: Rockford, IL, 1984; p 176.
(21) Story, S. C.; Murray, T. F.; DeLander, G. E.; Aldrich, J . V.
Synthesis and Opioid Activity of 2-Substituted Dynorphin A-(1-
13) Amide Analogues. Int. J . Pept. Protein Res. 1992, 40, 89-
96.
(22) Cheng, Y. C.; Prusoff, W. H. Relationship Between the Inhibition
Constant (Ki) and the Concentration of Inhibitor Which Causes
50 Percent Inhibition (IC50) of an Enzymatic Reaction. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 1973, 22, 3099-3108.
(23) Gairin, J . E.; Botanch, C.; Cros, J .; Meunier, J . C. Binding of
Dynorphin-A and Related Peptides to Kappa-Opioid and Mu-
Opioid ReceptorssSensitivity to Na+ Ions and Gpp(NH)p. Eur.
J . Pharmacol.sMol. Pharmacol. Sect. 1989, 172, 381-384.
(24) Schild, H. O. Br. J . Pharmacol. 1947, 2, 189-206.
(25) Tallarida, R. J .; Murray, R. B. Pharmacolgical Calculations, 2nd
ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1987.
Ack n ow led gm en t. This research was supported by
NIDA Grant R01 DA05195. The authors thank Dr.
Valerie Caldwell for performing the radioligand binding
assays, Martin Knittel and Elizabeth Olenchek for
performing the GPI assays, and Lisa Colona for per-
forming the in vivo assays.
(26) Hughes, J .; Kosterlitz, H. W.; Leslie, F. M. Assessment of the
Agonist and Antagonist Activities of Narcotic Analgesic Drugs
by Means of the Mouse vas deferens. Br. J . Pharmacol. 1974,
51, 139P-140P.
(27) Ro´nai, A. Z.; Gra´f, L.; Sze´kely, J . I.; Dunai-Kova´cs, Z.; Bajusz,
S. Differential Behaviour of LPH-(61-91)-Peptide in Different
Model Systems: Comparison of the Opioid Activities of LPH-
(61-91)-Peptides and its Fragments. FEBS Lett. 1977, 74, 182-
184.
(28) Thompson, W. R. Use of Moving Averages and Interpolation to
Estimate Median Effective Dose. I. Fundamental Formulas,
Estimation of Error, and Relation to Other Methods. Bacterio-
logical Rev. 1947, 11, 115-145.
Refer en ces
(1) Chavkin, C.; J ames, I. F.; Goldstein, A. Dynorphin is a Specific
Endogenous Ligand of the κ Opioid Receptor. Science 1982, 215,
413-415.
(2) Aldrich, J . V. Analgesics. In Burger’s Medicinal Chemistry and
Drug Discovery; Wolff, M. E., Ed.; J ohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New
York, 1996; Vol. 3: Therapeutic Agents, pp 321-441.
(3) Chavkin, C.; Goldstein, A. Specific Receptor for the Opioid
Peptide Dynorphin: Structure-Activity Relationships. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1981, 78, 6543-6547.
J M960747T