U. S. Schubert et al.
nated product (11%) and 3 (24%; Table 2, entry 6). Again,
inefficient vinylation leads to severe side reactions, thus, we
considered the fluoride-free activation of vinyltrimethoxysi-
lane 6b with sodium hydroxide, as reported for the high-
yielding Hiyama–Heck reactions under ligand-free condi-
tions.[18] However, no improvement of the vinylation step
was observed when we applied: 1) the original ligand-free
conditions, 2) activation by potassium fluoride, or 3) our op-
timized cyclization conditions (Table 2, entry 7). Hence, the
versatility of the Hiyama–Heck route appears to be limited
by incompatible conditions for each C–C coupling step.
the one-pot preparation of 5 (Scheme 4, right). Because re-
ductive amination with borohydride reagents in the presence
of Pd0 led to partial hydrogenation of the vinyl groups,[19] in-
termediate 2e was prepared alternatively by nucleophilic
substitution of commercially available 2-bromobenzyl bro-
mide[20] and the reaction conditions for ring formation were
adjusted. The desired compound 5 forms in a remarkable
overall yield of 33% (52% based on intermediate 2e;
Table 2, entry 12). The lower yields arise from double alky-
lation of the amino group in the first step, which influences
the stoichiometry in a similar fashion as previously discussed
for the twofold vinylation of 2d. The corresponding product
bears a vinylbenzyl substituent at the nitrogen atom (see
Figures 33–36 in the Supporting Information), which may be
transformed into an alkyne to afford an aza-DIBO function-
alized with a terminal alkyne group. Further optimization is
beyond the scope of this study but is likely to increase the
overall yield.
Suzuki–Heck cascade: At this stage, the related Suzuki–
Heck route seemed a viable alternative because similar con-
ditions for both C–C coupling steps can be applied, demon-
strated for the vinylation with boroxine.[13] Initial experi-
ments with commercially available vinylboroxine 6c
(Scheme 4) showed the efficient vinylation of 2c–e followed
by cyclization to 5 (Table 2, entries 8–10). The product dis-
tribution can be explained by consideration of the reactivity
Cyclooctyne formation: After ring assembly was achieved,
À
of the C X bond—the rates decrease in the order I>Br>
functionalization/protection of the amino group and genera-
ꢀ
Cl—and the fact that vinylation is significantly faster than
cyclization. This leads to efficient monovinylation of the
more reactive halide in 2c (I) or 2e (Br), followed by
tion of the C C triple bond were considered. The intermedi-
ate 5 is readily converted into a functionalized amide, fol-
lowed by addition of dibromine, and subsequent twofold de-
hydrohalogenation to form the alkyne.[6b] However, purifica-
tion by normal-phase chromatography (on either silica or
alumina) is complicated due to the high polarity of the
amide group compared to the subtle changes in the non-
polar skeleton (in agreement with the available 1H NMR
spectra).[7] Because of the flexibility of the commonly used
alkyl linker, the isolation of the final alkyne by crystalliza-
tion was not reported and the materials were used without
further purification.
À
slower reaction of the remaining C X bond to effectively
furnish the overall cyclization product in 48 and 61% yield,
respectively. In the case of 2c, which has two C Br bonds,
À
divinylation occurs before cyclization, which consumes the
available vinyl groups and also prevents the cyclization,
shown by the significantly lower yield of 5 (28%). In con-
trast to the Hiyama–Heck route, only traces of the dehalo-
genation products and small amounts of regioisomer 4 and
bridged coupling product 3 were formed. Notably, the gener-
ality of the regioselective Suzuki–Heck cascade for ring-as-
sembly is demonstrated by 2c, which proceeds by vinylation
of the aniline subunit and subsequent cyclization. In line
with previous results, large-scale preparation from 2e at in-
creased reagent concentration and reduced catalyst loading
Hence, we decided to replace the alkyl chain by a more
rigid aromatic unit to circumvent this problem. The benzoic
acid analogue 7 is smoothly generated in good isolated yield
(81%) and is cleanly converted to dibromo adduct 8
(Scheme 5). The 1H NMR spectrum of 8 (Figure 2, top)
shows a complex pattern with significant line broadening of
some peaks, which is attributed to two conformers (65:35)
based on NOESY and HSQC analysis (see Figures 44–45 in
the Supporting Information). The EXSY cross-peak in the
NOESY spectrum between both species is attributed to con-
allowed the preparation of
entry 11).
5 in 73% yield (Table 2,
One-pot preparation: The modular character of the ap-
proach may be extended to include C N bond formation in
À
Scheme 4. Double cross-coupling. i) NaCNBH3, ZnCl2, MeOH. ii) Siloxane, fluoride, Pd0, phosphine. iii) Boroxine/K2CO3, Pd0, phosphine. iv) K2CO3;
then boroxine, Pd0, phosphine.
2154
ꢂ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 2150 – 2157