8726
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8726-8727
Toward Biomimetic Ion Channels Formed by
Rigid-Rod Molecules: Length-Dependent
Ion-Transport Activity of Substituted
Oligo(p-Phenylene)s
Naomi Sakai, Kevin C. Brennan, Linnea A. Weiss, and
Stefan Matile*
Department of Chemistry
Georgetown UniVersity
Washington, D.C. 20057-1227
Figure 1. Amphotericin B (AmB 1), composed of mycosamine
(“anchoring”) (A), polyene (“rigid-rod”) (B), and polyol (“relay”)
subunits (C).
ReceiVed May 12, 1997
Polyene macrolide antibiotics, e.g. amphotericin B (AmB 1,
Figure 1), are unique examples of nonpeptide natural products
which form ion channels in biomembranes.1,2 Three structural
subunits are essential for the formation of “barrel stave”-type
AmB aggregates: the mycosamine group (Figure 1A) “anchors”
AmB 1 at the bilayer/water interface, the hydrophobic polyene
rods (Figure 1B) allow cooperative van der Waals forces with
components of cell membranes, and the polyols (Figure 1C)
function as ionophoric “relays”. While numerous alternative
“anchors” and “relays” have been explored by means of
synthetic, nonpeptide ion channel models,3 specific hydrophobic
interactions have not received equal attention, even though they
apparently give rise to the cell membrane specificity of AmB
1. Here, as a first step toward artificial ion channels which
specifically recognize (bio)membranes by their thickness, we
report syntheses and activities of substituted oligo(p-phenylene)s
2-4 (Figure 2).
Figure 2. In-scale planar structures of membrane-bound oligo(p-
phenylene)s 2-4.
ecules because of the immense synthetic possibilities to modify
the hydrophobic skeleton, as well as their luminescence,
conductivity, and conformational flexibility along the long
molecular axis.
On the basis of the findings by Ourisson and co-workers,4
we hypothesized that the ion transport activity of substituted
rigid-rod molecules5,6 would be maximized if their length
matches the thickness of lipid bilayers. Shape and length of
the rigid-rod skeletons should further control their organization
in lipid bilayers, and the attachment of “relays” along a rigid-
rod skeleton may result in versatile, artificial ion channels.
Oligo(p-phenylene)s7 were selected as model rigid-rod mol-
Syntheses of oligomers 2-4 are shown in the Scheme 1.
Chelation-controlled lithiation of 3,3′-bianisole 5 with the
sterically demanding t-BuLi followed by iodination gave 6 and
7 as major products in a mixture of regioisomers. Oxidative
coupling of 6 with n-BuLi/CuCl2 furnished tetramer 8.7d,e For
the preparation of oligomers 9 and 10, dimer 6 was converted
into boronic acid 11. Suzuki coupling8 of 11 and bisiodo
derivative 7 afforded hexamer 9. Regioselectively iodinated
tetramer 12 was elongated identically to give 10. The methyl
groups of oligomers 8-10 were removed, and the resulting
oligophenols 13-15 were converted into acetonides 16-18 with
racemic tosylate 19. Acid-catalyzed deprotection yielded poly-
ols 2-4.
The initial evaluation of ion transport activities was made
with uniformly sized, small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) com-
posed of fresh egg yolk phosphatidylcholine (EYPC). The
thickness of the hydrophobic part of EYPC bilayers, which
consist of ∼70% 16:0 and 18:1 PC, is thought to be nearly equal
to that of pure di-18:1 PC bilayers (36 Å).9 In contrast to
tetramer 2 (17 Å) and hexamer 3 (26 Å), octamer 4 (34 Å)
should thus be able to span this bilayer subunit (Figure 2).
EYPC-SUVs containing entrapped HPTS (8-hydroxypyrene-
1,3,6-trisulfonic acid) were prepared by the dialytic detergent
removal technique (100 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 0.05 mM
KCl, pH 7.0).10 Increase of extravesicular pH from 7.0 to 7.6
led to negligible changes in the emission of the intravesicular
HPTS.11 The presence of 20 µM tetramer 2 had a minor effect
on the intravesicular pH compared to the negative control
(1) (a) Bolard, J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1985, 864, 257. Recent leading
references include: (b) Yamashita, K.; Janout, V.; Bernard, E. M.;
Armstrong, D.; Regen, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6249. (c) Stadler,
E.; Dedek, P.; Yamashita, K.; Regen, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
6677. (d) Bolard, J.; Legrand, P.; Heitz, F.; Cybulska, B. Biochemistry 1991,
30, 5707.
(2) For other nonpeptide natural products and their analogues of interest
see: (a) Sakai, N.; Matile, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2613. (b) Matile,
S.; Nakanishi, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 757. (c) Deng,
G.; Dewa, T.; Regen, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8975.
(3) Gokel, G. W.; Murillo, O. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 425.
(4) Milon, A.; Wolff, G.; Ourisson, G.; Nakatani, Y. HelV. Chim. Acta
1986, 69, 12.
(5) In contrast to their poorly explored role as membrane-related
biomaterials,6 rigid-rod molecules have attracted a great deal of attention
for the preparation of novel materials and as spacers to probe intramolecular
interactions. Selected recent references: (a) Maddux, T.; Li, W.; Yu, L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 844. (b) Nuding, G.; Vo¨gtle, F.; Danielmeier,
K.; Steckhan, E. Synthesis 1996, 71. (c) Li, W.; Fox, M. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 11752. (d) Ayres, F. D.; Khan, S.; Chapman, O. L.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 8561. (e) Eaton, P. E.; Galoppini, E.; Gilardi,
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7588. (f) Kaszynski, P.; Friedli, A. C.;
Michl, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 601. (g) Yang, X.; Jiang, W.;
Knobler, C. B.; Hawthorne, M. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 9719. (h)
Feldman, K. S.; Bobo, J. S.; Ensel, S. M.; Lee, Y. B.; Weinreb, P. H. J.
Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 474.
(6) Lehn, J.-M. In Frontiers in Supramolecular Organic Chemistry and
Photochemistry; Schneider, H.-J., Du¨rr, H., Eds.; VCH: Weinheim, 1991;
p 1.
(8) Miyaura, N.; Yanagi, T.; Suzuki, A. Synth. Commun. 1981, 11, 513.
(9) (a) Caffrey, M.; Feigenson, G. W. Biochemistry 1981, 20, 1949. (b)
Kleinfeld, A. M. Curr. Top. Membr. Transp. 1987, 29, 1.
(10) (a) Zumbu¨hl, O.; Weder, H. G. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1981, 640,
252. (b) Mimms, L. T.; Zampighi, G.; Nozaki, Y.; Tanford, C.; Reynolds,
J. A. Biochemistry 1981, 20, 833.
(11) (a) Venema, K.; Gibrat, R.; Grouzis, J.-P.; Grignon, C. Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 1993, 1146, 87. (b) Kano, K.; Fendler, J. H. Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 1978, 509, 289.
(7) Some pertinent references on oligo(p-phenylene)s: (a) Rajca, A.;
Safronov, A.; Rajca, S.; Shoemaker, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997,
36, 448. (b) Keegstra, M. A.; De Feyter, S.; De Schryver, F.; Mu¨llen, K.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 775. (c) Baker, K. N.; Fratini, A.
V.; Resch, T.; Knachel, H. C.; Adams, W. W.; Socci, E. P.; Farmer, B. L.
Polymer 1993, 34, 1571. (d) Rinke, M.; Gu¨sten, H.; Ache, H. J. J. Phys.
Chem. 1985, 90, 2661. (e) Heitz, W.; Ullrich, R. Makromol. Chem. 1966,
98, 29.
S0002-7863(97)01513-8 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society