436
J. Mittendorf et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 433–436
A very limited study on the structure–activity-relation-
ship (SAR) of cispentacin 2 as previously described13
indicated strict structural requirements for antifungal
activity. The same trend could be observed in this more
extensive study. Whereas dehydro-cispentacin 3 showed
only slightly lower potency (IC50 0.5 mg/L), transposi-
tion or hydrogenation of the double bond in 1 resulted
in a significant loss of activity (examples 4, 5). Likewise,
insertion of heteroatoms (examples 6–10), reduction of
ringsize ( 11) or methyl substitution (13–17) had a
negative impact on antifungal activity. A variety of
open-chain analogues, as exemplified by compound 12,
were inactive.
as PLD-118 by Pliva, Croatia for the oral treatment of
yeast infections.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to D. Arlt, P. Babczinski, U.
Geschke, D. Habich, W. Hartwig, J. Hotho, S. Martitz,
M. Plempel, E. Schwenner, W. Schroeck and K. Ziegel-
bauer for support and helpful discussions, P. Binger and
A. Marhold for intermediates and A. Goehrt for X-ray
analysis.
We also investigated the SAR at position 4 of the
cyclopentane ringin more detail. Amongthese deriva-
tives (18–24), only the introduction of an exo-methylene
group resulted in strong antifungal activity. Compound
21 (IC50 0.13 mg/L) was equipotent to cispentacin 2 and
selected for further derivatizations.
References and Notes
1. (a) Pfaller, M. A. J. Hosp. Infect. 1995, 30, 329. (b) Dixon,
D. M.; McNeil, M. M.; Cohen, M. L.; Gellin, B. G.; La
Montagne, J. R. Public Health Rep. 1996, 111, 226. (c)
Edmond, M. B.; Wallace, S. E.; McClish, D. K.; Pfaller, M. A.;
Jones, R. N.; Wenzel, R. P. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1999, 29, 239.
2. Hossain, M. A.; Ghannoum, M. A. Expert Opin. Investig.
Drugs 2000, 9, 1797.
3. Kunisch, F.; Babczinski, P.; Arlt, D.; Plempel, M. Ger.
Offen. DE 4028046 A1, Chem. Abstr. 1992, 117, 20486.
4. (a) Konishi, M.; Nishio, M.; Saitoh, K.; Miyaki, T.; Oki,
T.; Kawaguchi, H. J. Antibiot. 1989, 42, 1749. (b) Kawabata,
K.; Inamoto, Y.; Sakana, K.; Iwamoto, T.; Hashimoto, S. J.
Antibiot. 1990, 43, 513. (c) Iwamoto, T.; Tsujii, E.; Ezaki, M.;
Fujie, A.; Hashimoto, S.; Okuhara, M.; Kohsaka, M.; Ima-
naka, H.; Kawabata, K. J. Antibiot. 1990, 43, 1. (d) Oki, T.;
Hirano, M.; Tomatsu, K.; Numata, K.; Kamei, H. J. Antibiot.
1989, 42, 1756.
The (1R, 2S)-configuration of 21 turned out to be
essential, since stereoisomers 25 and 26 demonstrated
only weak antifungal activity. Again, a very steep SAR
was observed, resultingin significant loss of potency,
when the double bond of 21 was shifted to other posi-
tions (27–29, 34), small substituents were introduced
(30–33) or the ringsize was altered ( 35–38). Modifi-
cations of the carboxyl (39–47) and the amino sub-
stituent (48–51) indicated that both groups are crucial
for potent in vitro activity against C. albicans. Methyl
ester 45 and dipeptides such as 48, however, showed
strongin vivo antifungal activity probably due to pro-
teolytic cleavage in plasma to release 21.
5. Fulop, F. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2181.
6. Mittendorf, J.; Kunisch, F.; Plempel, M. Ger. Offen. DE
4217776 A1, Chem. Abstr. 1994, 121, 83988.
7. Grynkiewicz, G. Carbohydr. Res. 1984, 128, C9.
8. Mittendorf, J. Eur. Pat. Appl. EP 805145 A1. Chem. Abstr.
1997, 127, 359100.
9. Murata, S.; Suzuki, M.; Noyori, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980,
21, 2527.
10. Feldhoff, R.; Haas, A.; Lieb, M. J. Fluorine Chem. 1990,
49, 225.
11. Lee, K.; Wiemer, D. F. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5556.
12. Prepared in analogy to: Djerassi, C. J. Org. Chem. 1948,
13, 848.
b-Amino acid 21 (BAY 10-8888) exhibits its antifungal
activity by a unique dual mode of action.17 First, it is
accumulated about 200-fold in yeast cells by active
transport via permeases specific for branched-chain
amino acids. Inside the cell 21 inhibits specifically iso-
leucyl-tRNA synthetase, resultingin inhibition of pro-
tein synthesis and cell growth. In contrast, active
transport and inhibition of protein synthesis of cis-
pentacin 2 appears to be mediated by the corresponding
enzymes specific for proline.17 Actingas mimetics of
small amino acids may explain the observed narrow
SAR of antifungal b-amino acids.
13. Ohki, H.; Inamoto, Y.; Kawabata, K.; Kamimura, T.;
Sakane, K. J. Antibiot. 1991, 44, 546.
14. Duncia, J. V.; Pierce, M. E.; Santella, J. B. J. Org. Chem.
1991, 56, 2395.
15. Manfre, F.; Kern, J.-M.; Biellmann, J.-F. J. Org. Chem.
1992, 57, 2060.
Amongall so far prepared b-amino acids 21 exhibited
the most favourable activity-tolerability profile and was
selected for further development. It showed high efficacy
in rat and mouse systemic candidiasis models including
azole-resistant strains18 and a favourable pharmaco-
kinetic (almost 100% oral bioavailability in rats, dogs,
rabbits; 7 h half-life in man) and safety profile.
16. In vitro testingwas performed by a microbroth dilution
technique (96-well microtitre plates) with an inoculum of 103
cfu / mL of C. albicans ATCC 36082 in YNB medium (yeast-
nitrogen base powder, 6.7 g/L, glucose 10 g/L, pH7). IC50-
values were determined after incubation for 24 h at 37 ꢁC.
Read-out was performed photo-/nephelometrically on a Spec-
tra III Elisa reader at 360 nm.
17. Ziegelbauer, K.; Babczinski, P.; Schoenfeld, W. Anti-
microb. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 2197.
In conclusion, an extensive chemical optimization on
b-amino acids revealed very steep SAR for antifungal
activity and led to the identification of the novel
b-amino acid 21. An efficient asymmetric synthesis
could be developed for this compound. BAY 10-8888 21
is currently beinginvestigated in phase II clinical studies
18. Schoenfeld, W.; Mittendorf, J.; Schmidt, A.; Geschke, U.
Abstracts, 41st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial
Agents and Chemotherapie, Chicago, IL, Sept 22–25, 2001;
American Society for Microbiology: Washington, DC, 2001;
F-2144.