Organic Letters
Letter
Zhang9 reported the preparation of a pyrano[2,3-b]indol-2-one
by cesium fluoride-promoted carboxylative cyclization of 3-(1-
phenylethylidene)indolin-2-one via γ-carboxylation using car-
bon dioxide (Scheme 1d). In most of these studies, only one
pyrano[2,3-b]indol-2-one product was prepared and unsat-
isfactory yields were reported. Thus, the development of novel
and highly efficient processes for the synthesis of pyrano[2,3-
b]indol-2-ones is of great value.
a
Table 2. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
temp
time
(h)
yield
(%)
entry
catalyst
(°C)
Lanthanide silylamides are bifunctional compounds that
exhibit both the Lewis acidity of the lanthanide center and the
Bronsted basicity of the silylamino group. They have been
found to be efficient catalysts for a series of valuable
transformations.10 On the other hand, as amphiphilic micro-
cyclic molecules with large ring strain, cyclopropenones have
often been used as building blocks for the construction of
larger molecules.11 Accordingly, in the course of our
development of efficient strategies for building cyclic
compounds,12 we conceived the idea of establishing a method
for the synthesis of pyrano[2,3-b]indol-2-ones using a
lanthanide silylamide as the catalyst and cyclopropenone as
the starting material.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
[(Me3Si)2N]3La(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3
[(Me3Si)2N]3Nd(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3
[(Me3Si)2N]3Sm(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3
[(Me3Si)2N]3Er(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3
[(Me3Si)2N]3Yb(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3
−
LaCl3
NaN(SiMe3)2
La[N(SiMe3)2]3
LiCl
[(Me3Si)2N]3La(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3
[(Me3Si)2N]3La(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3
[(Me3Si)2N]3La(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3
[(Me3Si)2N]3La(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3
[(Me3Si)2N]3La(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3
[(Me3Si)2N]3La(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
rt
80
110
110
110
110
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1
82
79
73
79
78
0
trace
14
43
0
72
82
90
84
86
87
b
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
We first investigated the reaction of N-ethyl isatin (1a),
diethyl phosphite (2), and 2,3-diphenylcyclopropenone (3a)
catalyzed by [(Me3Si)2N]3Yb(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3 (Table 1). First,
3
6
a
Reaction conditions: 0.29 mmol of 1a, 0.29 mmol of 2, 0.24 mmol of
a
Table 1. Solvent Screening
3a, 20 mol % catalyst (relative to 3a), 1.0 mL of toluene. Isolated
yields are reported. With 60 mol % NaN(SiMe3)2.
b
1−5), while no reaction was observed in the absence of a
catalyst (entry 6). [(Me3Si)2N]3La(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3 was found
to be slightly more active than the other catalysts.
entry
solvent
THF
DMF
DMSO
MeCN
1,4-dioxane
DME
DCE
PhCl
n-hexane
toluene
yield (%)
Owing to the bifunctionality of lanthanide silylamides,
several comparative experiments were conducted to explore
the origin of their catalytic activity in this reaction. Reactions
with LaCl3 and NaN(SiMe3)2 as the catalyst afforded very little
product, indicating that a Lewis acid or Brønsted base alone
cannot catalyze the reaction (entries 7 and 8).
[(Me3Si)2N]3Ln(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3 may be considered as
chloride-bridged “ate” complexes derived from homoleptic
lanthanide silylamides {Ln[N(SiMe3)2]3}. Accordingly, each
individual component of the catalyst was evaluated (entries 9
and 10). However, the reaction with homoleptic La[N-
(SiMe3)2]3 gave a yield of only 43%, while LiCl was found
to be inactive in this reaction, indicating that the way
La[N(SiMe3)2]3 bonds to LiCl has a remarkable influence
on activity in this system. The reaction temperature and time
were also optimized (entries 11−16). The final yield obtained
from the reaction in toluene under reflux for 1.5 h was 90%.
As a means to optimize catalyst loading, ligands were added
to the reaction system. A series of ligands were investigated
with a 10 mol % loading of [(Me3Si)2N]3La(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3
(Table 3). In the absence of a ligand, the product was obtained
in 50% yield (entry 1). Phenols with bulkier substituents, such
as 4-(tert-butyl)phenol, 2-(tert-butyl)phenol, and 2,6-di(tert-
butyl)-4-methylphenol, did not improve the reactivity
significantly, nor did quinolin-8-ol (L1) (entries 2−7). Salens
(L2 and L3) and N-phenyl-1-(pyrrol-2-yl)methanimines (L4
and L5) also led to unsatisfactory results (entries 8−13). When
β-diketimines derived from pentane-2,4-dione (L6 and L7)
were evaluated (entries 14−17), better results were obtained
and it was found that more sterically hindered ligands lead to
higher reaction yields. Therefore, β-diketimines derived from
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
60
19
43
36
53
54
51
69
57
78
a
Reaction conditions: 0.29 mmol of 1a, 0.29 mmol of 2, 0.24 mmol of
3a, 20 mol % [(Me3Si)2N]3Yb(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3 (relative to 3a), 50
°C, 1.5 h, 1.0 mL of solvent. Isolated yields are reported.
1a and diethyl phosphite were mixed in the presence of 20 mol
% [(Me3Si)2N]3Yb(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3 for 30 min, and then 3a
and THF were added. The mixture was stirred for a further 1.5
h at 50 °C. After workup, the major product was isolated and
identified as the expected product pyrano[2,3-b]indol-2-one.
The yield was 60%. Encouraged by this preliminary result, we
investigated a series of reaction conditions. The results of
solvent screening (Table 1) showed that high-polarity solvents,
such as DMF, DMSO, and MeCN, do not favor the formation
of the product (entries 2−4, respectively), while ethers,
halohydrocarbons, and n-hexane provide only moderate yields
(entries 5−9). Toluene was found to be the best solvent
among those screened, achieving a 78% yield (entry 10).
Further study of the lanthanide center of the catalyst was
then conducted. [(Me3Si)2N]3Ln(μ-Cl)Li(THF)3 with differ-
ent metal centers from La to Yb was evaluated, and all of the
reactions afforded the product in high yields (Table 2, entries
4786
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 4785−4790