J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 9369 9371
9369
Sch em e 1
A New a n d Ver sa tile Allylic Alcoh ol An ion
a n d Acyl â-An ion Equ iva len t for
Th r ee-Ca r bon Hom ologa tion s
Romualdo Caputo, Annalisa Guaragna,
Giovanni Palumbo,* and Silvana Pedatella
Dipartimento di Chimica Organica e Biologica,
Universita` di Napoli Federico II, Via Mezzocannone,
16 I-80134 Napoli, Italy
Received August 5, 1997
There are many reagents useful for the extension of
organic molecules by three carbons with some functional-
ity at the new terminus.1 However, to the best of our
knowledge, the possibility of introducing an allylic alcohol
residue is restricted to only a few examples2 despite its
potential utility in the synthesis of complex organic
molecules, like saccharides and related polyhydroxylated
natural products, e.g., via asymmetric epoxidation3 or
dihydroxylation.4 Therefore, we report herein the design,
synthesis, and some examples of the synthetic versatility
of 3-C-lithiated (5,6-dihydro-1,4-dithiin-2-yl)[(4-methoxy-
benzyl)oxy]methane (1) which can be utilized as an allylic
alcohol anion equivalent and leads to elongations of
various electrophiles by introduction of a fully protected
hydroxypropenyl moiety. The latter contains a double
bond, which can be unravelled with the cis configuration
by diastereoselective removal of the dimethylene disul-
fur bridge, as well as a protected primary hydroxyl group
that, depending on the deprotection conditions used
(DDQ/NaBH4 or DDQ), may lead either to the free allylic
alcohol or to an ,â-unsaturated aldehyde.
The parent compound of 1, 2-[[O-(p-methoxybenzyl)-
oxy]methyl]-5,6-dihydro-1,4-dithiin (2), can be easily
prepared in four steps (overall yield 83%) from com-
mercial methyl pyruvate via its 1,3-dithiolane and ring
enlargement5 of the latter. The choice of 4-methoxyben-
zyl ether (MPM)6 as the hydroxyl-protecting group was
crucial to the utilization of 2 as the intended allylic
alcohol anion equivalent via its lithiation (Scheme 1). In
addition, 4-methoxybenzyl ethers have the advantage of
being selectively removed when in the presence of other
common protecting groups including non-ring-substituted
benzyl ethers.7 The use of protecting groups such as tert-
butyldimethylsilyl ethers (TBDMS) and tetrahydropyra-
nyls (THP) was rather unsatisfactory and resulted in poor
reactivity of the entire molecule under the C C bond-
forming reaction conditions.
electrophilessnamely, methyl iodide, benzyl bromide,
(R)- and (S)-benzyl glycidyl ether, (R)-O-isopropyli-
deneglyceral8saccording to a standard procedure we
already reported9 for other 5,6-dihydro-1,4-dithiins. The
results are shown in Table 1. The synthetic relevance
of these coupling reactions resides on the fact that the
products can be either deprotected, keeping the double
bond tied up by the dimethylene disulfur bridge (Table
2), or stereoselectively desulfurized affording a cis-
configurated 4-methoxybenzyl propenyl ether (Scheme 2).
The cleavage of the 4-methoxybenzyl ether function
was performed by treatment of the coupling products
with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) in
CH2Cl2/H2O and then sodium borohydride in ethanol. The
results are shown in Table 2. Sodium cyanoborohydride,
reported10 to be effective in the reductive cleavage of
MPM ethers, led instead to only poor results. It is
noteworthy that, if the above MPM ethers are cleaved
by treatment with an equivalent amount of DDQ, a
formyl function is quantitatively obtained rather than the
expected7 primary alcohol (Table 2) in the final product.
Apparently, the aldehyde formation is not the result of
the known oxidation11 of the free allylic hydroxyl group
by DDQ. As a matter of fact the MPM ether 4, when
treated with only 50% of the equivalent amount of DDQ,
afforded aldehyde 14 and anisole (from the 4-methoxy-
benzyl ether moiety) in an approximately 1:1 ratio and
50% yield, in addition to a relevant amount (ca. 40%) of
unreacted starting product. No traces of the hydroxyl-
bearing compound 13 were detected. This is likely due
to the preferential abstraction of a hydrogen atom from
the vinylic rather than from the benzylic12 methylene
group and the consequent formation of a sulfur-stabilized
carbocation.
The subsequent coupling reactions were effected by
treatment of 2 with BuLi and then with miscellaneous
Desulfurization of the above MPM ethers with Raney-
Ni (W2) in glacial acetic acid at 0 °C led, as expected,13
only to cis isomer formation (Scheme 2). Deprotection
of the allyllic hydroxyl group and desulfurization of the
double bond can be carried out independently, leading
either to allylic alcohols or to their corresponding MPM
ethers having a cis-configurated double bond. Two
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 39 81 704
1279. Fax: 39 81 704 1283. E-mail: ctsgroup@cds.unina.it.
(1) Stowell, J . C. Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 1984, 84, 409.
(2) (a) Nishiyama, H.; Narimatsu, S.; Itoh, K. Tetrahedron Lett.
1981, 22, 5289. (b) Miller, R. B.; Al-Hassan, M. I. J . Org. Chem. 1983,
48, 4113. (c) Patterson, J . W. Synthesis 1985, 337.
(3) Schweiter, M. J .; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26,
2543.
(4) (a) Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem.
Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 1994, 94, 2483. (b) VanNieuwenhze, M. S.;
Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 843. (c) Park, C. Y.;
Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 2495.
(5) Caputo, R.; Ferreri, C.; Palumbo, G. Synthesis 1991, 223.
(6) Paquette, L. A. Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis;
J ohn Wiley & Sons: New York, 1995; pp 3326 3329.
(7) (a) Horita, K.; Yoshioka, T.; Tanaka, T.; Oikawa, Y.; Yonemitsu,
O. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 3021. (b) Oikawa, Y.; Tanaka, T.; Horita,
K.; Yonemitsu, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 5397. (c) Oikawa, Y.;
Yoshioka, T.; Yonemitsu, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 885.
(8) Schimdt, C. R.; Bryant, J . D. Org. Synth. 1993, 72, 6.
(9) Caputo, R.; Longobardo, L.; Palumbo, G.; Pedatella, S.; Giordano,
F. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 11857 and literature cited therein.
(10) Srikrishna, A.; Viswajanani, R.; Sattiggeri, J . A.; Vijaykumar,
D. J . Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5961.
(11) (a) Braude, E. A.; Linstead, R. P.; Woolridge, K. R. J . Chem.
Soc. 1956, 3070. (b) Burn, D.; Petrow, V.; Weston, G. O. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1960, 9, 14.
(12) Walker, D.; Hiebert, J . D. Chem. Rev. 1967, 67, 153.
(13) Caputo, R.; Palumbo, G.; Pedatella, S. Tetrahedron 1994, 50,
7265.
S0022-3263(97)01462-X CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society