RSC Advances
Paper
N,N0-Di-Boc-3-(isocyanomethyl)benzyl guanidine (3). To
a cooled solution of compound 2 (200 mg, 0.5 mmol) in pyridine
(5 mL), p-toluene sulphonyl chloride (190 mg, 1.0 mmol) was
mL) was added to a vial containing EDTA (5.0 mg), mannitol (5.0
mg) and SnCl2$2H2O (100 mg) in 0.1 N HCl (100 mL) and incu-
bated at room temperature for 30 min. The formation of the
intermediate complex was analyzed by TLC (>99%) (Rf ¼ 0,
intermediate EDTA complex; Rf ¼ 1, [99mTcO4]ꢀ; solvent:
acetone).
ꢃ
added and the mixture stirred at 0 C for 15 min. The reaction
mixture was then brought to room temperature and stirred for
another 2 h. Upon completion of the reaction (cf. TLC), the
reaction mixture was poured into water and extracted with
chloroform (3 ꢂ 10 mL). The combined chloroform extracts
were dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and removed under
vacuo to yield the crude product which was puried using silica
gel column chromatography to give 3 (87 mg, 45%).
99mTc-(4+1) complex (7). Intermediate complex (6) (0.5 mL)
was added to a vial containing a mixture of compound 5 (1–2
mg) and NS3 ligand (1 mg) in methanol (0.5 mL). The vial was
sealed and the reaction mixture heated in a boiling water
bath for 30 min. Aer cooling the vial to room temperature,
the complex 7 was analyzed by TLC (EtOH: Rf ꢁ 0.9 and
CHCl3: Rf ꢁ 0.2) and HPLC. To resolve the identity of the nal
complex 7 from the secondary intermediate 99mTc–NS3 (only
Rf(EtOAc) ¼ 0.5.
IR (neat, nmax/cmꢀ1): 3053 (Ar-H str., m); 2923 (C–H str., s);
2853 (C–H str., m); 2152 (N^C str., s); 1665 (C]O str., bs); 1529
(m); 1440 (m); 1384 (m); 1241 (m); 1064 (m); 788 (m).
dH (500 MHz; CDCl3; Me4Si): 7.0–7.4 (4H, m, Ph); 4.59 (2H, s,
CH2–NHC]N); 4.49 (2H, s, CH2–NC); 1.35–1.69 (14H, br s,
(CH3)3C–O–CO–N] and (CH3)3C–O–CO–NH–); 1.22–1.33 (4H,
br s, (CH3)3C–O–CO–N] and (CH3)3C–O–CO–NH–).
4
intermediate complex, without mono-dentate donor),
a fresh reaction was carried following the same procedure
without addition of compound 5 and the reaction mixture
was analyzed by HPLC.
Cu(I) complex of N,N0-di-Boc-3-(isocyanomethyl)benzyl guani-
dine (4). Compound 3 (78 mg, 0.4 mmol) was heatedꢃwith CuCl
(10 mg, 0.1 mmol) in anhydrous EtOH (2 mL) at 90 C for 1 h.
The reaction mixture was then allowed to attain ambient
temperature and was ltered through a 0.22 mm membrane
lter (Millipore). The solvent ethanol was then removed under
vacuo to obtain the desired compound 4 (130 mg, 80%).
IR (neat, nmax/cmꢀ1): 3055 (Ar-H str., m); 2923 (C–H str., s);
2853 (C–H str., m); 2185 (N^C str., s); 1667 (C]O str., bs); 1530
(m); 1440 (m); 1384 (m); 1244 (m); 1055 (m); 792 (m).
dH (500 MHz; CDCl3; Me4Si): 7.81 (1H, s, Ph); 7.51–7.62 (1H,
m, Ph); 7.26–7.42 (1H, m, Ph); 7.07–7.13 (1H, m, Ph); 4.68 (2H, s,
CH2–NC); 4.59 (2H, s, CH2–NHC]N); 1.08–1.38 (14H, m,
(CH3)3C–O–CO–N] and (CH3)3C–O–CO–NH–); 0.84–0.92 (4H,
m, (CH3)3C–O–CO–N] and (CH3)3C–O–CO–NH–).
dC (125 MHz; CDCl3; Me4Si): 161.3 (–N^C); 161.0 (]N–
COO); 156.2 (NH–COO); 153.1 (BocN]C–NH); 133.7 (phenyl
HC]C–CH2–NH–C]); 131.3 (phenyl HC]C–CH2–NH2); 129.4,
128.3, 126.3, 125.6 (phenyl HC]CH–CH); 83.4 ((CH3)3C–C]
O(N])); 79.5 ((CH3)3C–C]O(NH)); 48.7 (ArCH2NC); 41.5
(ArCH2NHCO–); 29.7, 29.5, 29.3, 28.9 ((CH3)3C).
Cu(I) complex of 3-(isocyanomethyl)benzyl guanidine (5).
Compound 4 (100 mg, 0.06 mmol) was directly treated with
triuoroacetic acid (TFA) (2 mL) and the solution stirred for 2 h
at room temperature. Thereaer, TFA was removed under
vacuum to obtain compound 5 (50 mg, quantitative) and was
analyzed as such without further purication.
Synthesis of Re-4+1 complex (8)
[Re(Me2PPh)NS3] intermediate complex. This intermediate
was prepared following a reported procedure.21
dH (500 MHz; CDCl3; Me4Si): 7.1–7.9 (5H, m, Ph); 2.5–3.1
(12H, br s, –CH2–S– and –CH2N–); 2.18 (3H, s, –PCH3); 2.05 (3H,
s, –PCH3).
ESI-MS (+ve mode): mass (calculated) C14H23NPReS3 516.7,
518.7; m/z (observed) 517.1, 519.1.
[ReNS3 (3)]. A mixture of [Re(Me2PPh)NS3] (50 mg, 0.09
mmol) and compound 3 (37 mg, 0.09 mmol) in chloroform was
reuxed overnight. Thereaer, the reaction mixture was cooled
and solvent was removed under vacuo to give the crude product.
The pure product (18 mg, 25%) was obtained using silica gel
column chromatography with chloroform as the eluting
solvent.
Rf(chloroform) ¼ 0.5.
IR (neat, nmax/cmꢀ1): 3331 (N–H str., m); 2924 (C–H str., s);
2854 (C–H str., m); 1972 (N^C str., bs); 1725, 1641 (C]O str., s);
1441 (m); 1154 (m).
dH (500 MHz; CDCl3; Me4Si): 7.51 (1H, d, J ¼ 6 Hz, Ph); 7.45
(1H, d, J ¼ 8 Hz, Ph); 7.34–7.37 (1H, m, Ph); 7.23–7.26 (1H, m,
Ph); 6.04 (2H, s, CH2NC); 4.66–4.68 (2H, m, CH2–NH–C); 2.8–3.2
(12H, br s, CH2–S– and –CH2N–); 1.45–1.56 (14H, m, (CH3)3C–O–
CO–N] and (CH3)3C–O–CO–NH–); 1.21–1.33 (4H, m, (CH3)3C–
O–CO–N] and (CH3)3C–O–CO–NH–).
ESI-MS (+ve mode): mass (calculated) C26H40N5O4ReS3 767.2,
769.2; m/z (observed) 767.4, 769.4.
IR (neat, nmax/cmꢀ1): 3055 (Ar-H str., m); 2923 (C–H str., s);
2853 (C–H str., m); 2185 (N^C str., s); 1530 (m); 1440 (m); 1384
(m); 1244 (m); 1055 (m); 792 (m).
dH (500 MHz; CDCl3; Me4Si): 7.2–7.7 (1H, m, Ph); 4.68 (2H, s,
CH2–NC); 4.55 (2H, s, CH2–NHC]NH).
Re-4+1 complex (8). The nal complex was obtained on
treatment of above Re-complex (10 mg) with TFA (1 mL) for 3 h.
No further purication was carried and pure product (13 mg,
quantitative) was obtained aer TFA removal.
IR (neat, nmax/cmꢀ1): 3333, 3198 (N–H str., m); 2926 (C–H str.,
s); 2854 (C–H str., m); 1966 (N^C str., bs); 1781, 1739, 1681 (C]
N str., bs); 1445 (m); 1203 (bm); 1154 (m); 777 (m).
dH (500 MHz; CDCl3; Me4Si): 7.23–7.52 (4H, m, Ph); 6.04 (2H,
Radiolabeling
99mTc(III)–EDTA complex (6). The synthesis of the reactive
intermediate complex was carried as per the reported proce- s, CH2NC); 4.66–4.68 (2H, m, CH2–NH–C); 2.8–3.2 (12H, br s,
dure.20 Briey, freshly eluted [99mTcO4]ꢀ (30 mCi/1.1 GBq, 1.0 CH2–S– and –CH2N–).
64904 | RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 64902–64910
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016