Trapping of Singlet Nitrene and Didehydroazepine
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 62, No. 10, 1997 3059
1
4 owing to the lack of characteristic H NMR signals in
s-1 estimated for 2S by Platz and his co-workers.2,14 The
reason for this discrepancy is not elucidated yet, though
it would be possible that three methyl groups on the
benzene ring retard the isomerization from the singlet
nitrene to the didehydroazepine or that Platz and his co-
workers underestimated the activation energy for the
ring expansion process from 2S to 3. In any event, it
should be emphasized that the rate constant for the
reaction of singlet mesitylnitrene (8S) with TCNE is
predicted to be on the order of 109 M-1 s-1 or greater.
An alternative candidate for the reactive intermediate
participating in the formation of the azomethine ylide 5
is triplet mesitylnitrene (8T). In analogy with the
carbene chemistry,15 the spin state of the nitrene involved
in an addition reaction to alkenes would be determined
by whether the stereochemistry of the alkenes is retained
or not. Unfortunately, these stereochemical studies could
be inapplicable to the formation of 5 because of the
cleavage of the initial carbon-carbon bond of the alkene.
Thus, though we cannot strictly exclude the mechanism
involving 8T, we should point out that the triplet mech-
anism is incompatible with our observations as follows.
It has been established that the ring expansion from
singlet phenylnitrene (2S) is favored over intersystem
crossing to its triplet state 2T at room temperature and
that this is also the case for singlet 2,6-dimethylphe-
nylnitrene.2 Thus, it is reasonable to think that the rate
of isomerization of the singlet nitrene 8S to the didehy-
droazepine 9 is much greater than that of intersystem
crossing to 8T under our photoreaction conditions. If 5
is produced by trapping of 8T with TCNE, then 9 is the
bifurcation point for the formation of the azomethine
ylide 5 and the spiroazepine 6 because 8T is formed
through intersystem crossing of 8S, which is regenerated
by 9. Consequently, an increase in the initial concentra-
tion of TCNE should result in the acceleration of trapping
of 9 with TCNE, which would lead to a decrease in the
product ratio [5]:[6]. It is not the case as demonstrated
in Figure 4.
We wish to give a discussion on the pathway to the
azomethine ylide 5 from singlet mesitylnitrene (8S) and
TCNE. Taking into account the reactions of a singlet
carbene with alkenes,15 it seems reasonable to think that
8S reacts concertedly with TCNE to give the aziridine 7.
However, we could not detect 7 in the photoreaction
mixture. In order to gain further information about the
TCNE-adducts derived from 8S, theoretical calculations
using the PM3 method were carried out. We optimized
the geometries of the azomethine ylide 5 and the aziri-
dine 7 and calculated their heat of formation. Some
selected bond lengths and angles of the optimized struc-
tures, as well as the calculated heat of formation, are
given in Table 1. The PM3-optimized geometry of 5 is
in fair agreement with the molecular structure deter-
mined by X-ray crystallography. As shown in Table 1,
the heat of formation of 7 is much greater than that of
5, which is probably due to a steric strain in 7, so that it
is revealed that the cleavage of the C(CN)2-C(CN)2 bond
of 7 to give 5 is a thermodynamically favored process.
Thus, we propose that the aziridine 7 would be initially
this type of adduct. Thus, at the present stage we cannot
determine whether an azomethine ylide-type adduct is
also produced but decomposes in the course of isolation
or the formation of the azomethine ylide 5 is due to a
higher nucleophilicity of singlet mesitylnitrene (8S)
compared with the nitrenes generated by photolysis of
phenyl, 2-methylphenyl, or 2,4-dimethylphenyl azide. In
any event, it is thought that the success in competitive
trapping of singlet nitrene and didehydroazepine with
TCNE in the photolysis of mesityl azide (4) is primarily
attributed to the high stability of the both adducts 5 and
6, which arises from steric and electronic effects of three
methyl groups.
We also examined the photochemical reaction of mesi-
tyl azide (4) with electron-deficient alkenes other than
TCNE. However, when 4 was irradiated in the presence
of maleic anhydride, dimethyl fumarate, or fumaronitrile,
no corresponding adducts could be detected in the pho-
toreaction mixture, but azomesitylene and 2,4,6-tri-
methylaniline were isolated as photoproducts. Azoben-
zenes and anilines are known to be produced through the
dimerization and the hydrogen abstraction of triplet
arylnitrenes, respectively.1 Thus, it is found that in the
case of alkene having a lower electrophilicity compared
with TCNE, the rate of reaction of 8S and 9 with the
alkene is considerably reduced, so that intersystem
crossing from 8S to 8T becomes a predominant path-
way.
Discu ssion
On the basis of our observations, we propose that
singlet mesitylnitrene (8S) and trimethyldidehydroazepine
(9) are responsible for the formation of the azomethine
ylide 5 and the spiroazepine 6, respectively, as shown in
Scheme 2. In this section, the reactivities of these
intermediates with TCNE, as well as other possible
mechanisms for the formation of the adducts, are dis-
cussed.
F or m a tion of th e Azom eth in e Ylid e 5. The azome-
thine ylide 5 seems to be produced by trapping of singlet
mesitylnitrene (8S) with TCNE. This provides the first
example of the capture of a singlet arylnitrene having
no electron-withdrawing groups with an alkene. The
least-squares analysis of the plot shown in Figure 4 gives
us kinetic information on the reactivity of 8S. From the
slope of the plot, the ratio of the rate constant for the
reaction of 8S with TCNE to that for the ring expansion
of 8S to 9, k1/ki, is obtained as 25.2 M-1. Platz and his
co-workers reported the absorption spectrum of didehy-
droazepine (3) by laser flash photolysis of phenyl azide
(1),2 and more recently, Schuster and his co-workers
directly observed 3 and its derivatives by the use of time-
resolved IR spectroscopy.4 Both groups detected 3 im-
mediately after the photolysis of 1 with the 20 ns laser
pulse, which leads to a value of >5 × 107 s-1 for the rate
constant for the ring expansion of 2S to 3. If we assume
ki > 5 × 107 s-1, the rate constant for the reaction of 8S
with TCNE, k1, is calculated to be >1.3 × 109 M-1 s-1
.
However, if we assume that the reaction of 8S with
TCNE is diffusion controlled (in acetonitrile, k1 ) 1.9 ×
1010 s-1),13 a maximum rate for ki is calculated to be 7.5
× 108 s-1, which is not consistent with the value of 1011(1
(14) McClelland and his co-workers estimated the rate constant for
the ring expansion of 2S as (2-4) × 1010 s-1, which was based on the
assumption that the rate constant for the protonation of 2S was equal
to that of alkylamines: ref 7b.
(15) For reviews on carbene chemistry, see, for example: (a)
Carbenes; Moss, R. A., J ones, M., J r., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1973,
1975; Vols. 1 and 2. (b) Kirmse, W. Carbene Chemistry; Academic
Press: New York, 1971. See also ref 1d.
(13) Murov, S. L.; Carmichael, I.; Hug, G. L. Handbook of Photo-
chemistry, 2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1993.