Ross et al.
JOCNote
Pd, rather than bisligated Pd.8-10 This has led to the design
and widespread applications of biarylphosphine ligands,11-14
which have been applied to great effect in Suzuki-Miyaura
cross-coupling reactions,15 as well as aryl amination reac-
tions.16,17 The most useful generally applicable ligand is
SPhos 9 and the closely related analogue RuPhos 10, which
each have the capacity to stabilize a monoligated Pd(0)
center by interaction between the ipso-carbon of the lower
ring and Pd, and also to stabilize a Pd(II) center by coordina-
tion of the alkoxy group to Pd. This combination results in
highly reactive catalysts that are also rather stable. In the
initial report,13 ligand to Pd ratios of 1:1 [with Pd(OAc)2 as
the Pd source] were shown to be most effective for Suzuki-
Miyaura reactions with aryl chlorides at room temperature.
In the subsequent full paper, ligand to Pd ratios of 2:1 were
generally used for reactions conducted at elevated tempera-
tures.14 The use of very low loadings of RuPhos and SPhos,
in combination with Pd, for the Negishi reaction to form
biaryls was reported by Buchwald in 2004;18 the active
catalysts were prepared by combining Pd2(dba)3 with 4 equiv
of the biarylphosphine ligand (resulting in a ligand to Pd
ratio of 2:1). Following this report, Bach reported the use of
RuPhos in combination with Pd2(dba)3 for the cross-cou-
pling of a range of functionalized alkylzinc halides to β-
bromo-R,β-unsaturated lactams.19 In a series of papers,
Knochel has shown that SPhos (and RuPhos), in combina-
tion with Pd(OAc)2, is a highly effective catalyst for the
Negishi cross-coupling of a wide range of organozinc re-
agents with a number of substrates, including those contain-
ing acidic protons.20-23 It is interesting that Knochel’s
procedures also employ a ligand to Pd ratio of 2:1, although
the use of a Pd(II) precursor does leave open the possibility
that 1 equiv of ligand might be consumed reducing Pd(II) to
Pd(0), rather than the reduction being effected either by zinc
or the alkylzinc halide. Very recently, Buchwald has intro-
duced a new ligand, CPhos 11, which, in combination with
Pd(OAc)2, is highly effective for the Negishi cross-coupling
of secondary organozinc reagents.24 Once more a ligand to
Pd ratio of 2:1 was employed. We now report our results on
TABLE 1. Influence of Catalysta on the Yield of Protected Phenylala-
nine 4a
entry
Pd precursor
mol %
ligand
mol %
yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Pd(OAc)2
Pd2dba3
Pd2dba3
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd2dba3
Pd2dba3
Pd2dba3
Pd2dba3
Pd2dba3
Pd2dba3
5
RuPhos
RuPhos
SPhos
RuPhos
SPhos
RuPhos
SPhos
SPhos
SPhos
SPhos
SPhos
10
10
10
2
2
2
2
1
0.6
0.5
0.2
70
85
80
25
63
24
73
72
59
51
48
2.5
2.5
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.25
0.15
0.125
0.05
10
11
aIn all cases, the Pd:L ratio is 2:1. bYields determined by 1H NMR.
TABLE 2. Influence of L:Pd Ratio on the Yield of 4a, Using Pd2dba3
entry
Pd2dba3(mol. %)
ligand
mol %
L:Pd
yield (%)a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.5
0.5
0.5
SPhos
SPhos
SPhos
SPhos
SPhos
SPhos
RuPhos
RuPhos
RuPhos
2
1
2:1
1:1
0.5:1
2:1
1:1
1:1
2:1
1:1
0.5:1
0:1
73
77
75
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
2
72
80b
73c
24
1
61
47
17
0.5
none
0.5
aYields determined by 1H NMR. bPd2dba3 and SPhos added as
separate solutions. cA solution of Pd2dba3 and SPhos used.
the application of biarylphosphine ligands to the Negishi
cross-coupling of serine-derived organozinc reagent 2 with
aromatic halides.
As a model reaction, we selected the Negishi cross-
coupling of organozinc reagent 2 with iodobenzene at room
temperature. Initial studies employed a ligand to Pd ratio of
2:1, and the results from screening combinations of Pd
precursor and biarylphosphine ligand at varying concentra-
tions are included in Table 1. At high Pd loadings (5 mol %)
use of either RuPhos or SPhos provided excellent yields of
the product 4a. It was striking that at reduced Pd loadings
(1 mol %) SPhos was clearly superior (entries 5 and 7
compared with entries 4 and 6). In all cases, use of Pd2dba3
gave improved results to those obtained with Pd(OAc)2.
Even with substantially lower catalyst loadings (down to
0.1 mol % Pd), respectable yields of product 4a were
obtained, although use of less than 0.5 mol % Pd (i.e., less
than 0.25 mol % Pd2dba3, entries 9-11) did result in a signi-
ficant reduction in yield. These very encouraging results
testify to the suitability of SPhos as a ligand for Negishi
coupling reactions of unreactive organozinc reagents.
The next stage of the optimization process focused on
determining the influence of the ligand to Pd ratio. As is
evident from Table 2, the optimum results arise from a ligand
to Pd ratio of 1:1, which appears to be entirely consistent
with the proposals by Buchwald on the identity of the active
catalytic species.12,14 The optimum catalytic system is a 1:1
ratio of SPhos to Pd (entries 5 and 6), at a Pd loading of
0.5 mol %. It is striking that an excess of RuPhos is actually
worse than a substoichiometric amount (entries 7 and 9),
which implies that the formation of L2Pd complexes results
in a smaller concentration of the catalytically active species.
The control experiment (entry 10) established that the
(8) Paul, F.; Patt, J.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 5969–
5970.
(9) Hartwig, J. F.; Paul, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5373–5374.
(10) Galardon, E.; Ramdeehul, S.; Brown, J. M.; Cowley, A.; Hii, K. K.;
Jutand, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1760–1763.
(11) Strieter, E. R.; Blackmond, D. G.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 13978–13980.
(12) Barder, T. E.; Biscoe, M. R.; Buchwald, S. L. Organometallics 2007,
26, 2183–2192.
(13) Walker, S. D.; Barder, T. E.; Martinelli, J. R.; Buchwald, S. L.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1871–1876.
(14) Barder, T. E.; Walker, S. D.; Martinelli, J. R.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4685–4696.
(15) Martin, R.; Buchwald, S. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1461–1473.
(16) Biscoe, M. R.; Barder, T. E.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2007, 46, 7232–7235.
(17) Surry, D. S.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6338–
6361.
(18) Milne, J. E.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13028–
13032.
(19) Albrecht, D.; Bach, T. Synlett 2007, 1557–1560.
(20) Manolikakes, G.; Schade, M. A.; Hernandez, C. M.; Mayr, H.;
Knochel, P. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2765–2768.
(21) Manolikakes, G.; Hernandez, C. M.; Schade, M. A.; Metzger, A.;
Knochel, P. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8422–8436.
(22) Manolikakes, G.; Dong, Z. B.; Mayr, H.; Li, J. S.; Knochel, P.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1324–1328.
(23) Dong, Z. B.; Manolikakes, G.; Li, J. S.; Knochel, P. Synthesis 2009,
681–686.
(24) Han, C.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7532–7533.
246 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 1, 2010