(
)
C. LensinkrJournal of Organometallic Chemistry 553 1998 387–392
391
Ž
.
tion and dried in vacuo. Yield 1.365 g 3.6 mmol, 87%
of 4.
4. X-ray structure determination of 4
Suitable crystals of compound 4 were obtained by
5
Ž
(
crystallization form CDCl3. A yellow crystal 0.35=
3.4. Synthesis of Ti h :s -C 5 H 4 C H 2 C H 2
0.30=0.20 mm3 was selected. Data were collected at
.
)(
NSO2C6 H4CH3 NEt2
) ( )
5
2
room temperature. The unit cell dimensions and inten-
sity data were obtained using a Siemens CCD detector
mounted on a P4 diffractometer and controlled by
SMART software. The data collection nominally cov-
ered over a hemisphere of reciprocal space, by a combi-
nation of two sets of exposures. In the first, each
exposure covered 0.38 for a total of 528 in omega. The
Ž
. Ž
.
0.42 g, 1.25 mmol in
To a solution of Ti NEt2
4
Ž
Ž
.
.
benzene 5 ml was added 1 0.32 g, 1.25 mmol . The
mixture was heated to reflux for 3 days. The solvent
was removed under reduced pressure to yield 5 as a
1
13
dark orange oil. The H and
NMR indicate a near
1
Ž
.
quantitative conversion. H NMR benzene-d6 3 d 7.78
3
Ž
Ž
.
Ž
second run covered 360 degrees in phi the mounting
d, 2H, JH – H s8.1 Hz, C6 H4 , 6.84 d, 2H, JH – H
s
3
.
.
Ž
.
axis also using 0.38 increments between frames. The
7.9 Hz, C6 H43 , 5.77 t, 2H, JH – H s2.6 Hz, C5H4 ,
Ž
.
Ž
Ž
crystal to detector distance was 4.0 cm. All frames were
processed using program SAINT to give raw data sets
which were corrected empirically for absorption using
5.59 t, 2H, JH – H s2.6 Hz, C5H4 , 3.91 m, 1H,
.
Ž
.
N–CHa , 3.40 m, 1H N–CHb , 3.33 m, 1H, CHa–C–
3
.
Ž
.
Ž
N , 1.98 m, 1H, CHb–C–N , 2.38 q, 4H, JH – H s3.4
3
w
x
Ž
..
Ž
SADABS cf. Blessing, Acta Cryst., A51, 1995, 33 .
Hz, N–CH2 ethyl , 2.36 q, 4H, JH – H s3.4 Hz, N–
3
˚
Ž
.
Ž
..
..
Ž
Graphite monochromator, l MoK a s0.71073 A. Tri-
CH2 ethyl , 0.95 t, 6H, JH – H s3.4 Hz, N–C–
3
˚
Ž .
clinic system, space group P-1, as7.434 1 A, bs
Ž
Ž
CH3 ethyl , 0.94 t, 6H, JH – H s3.4 Hz, N–C–
13
˚
˚
Ž .
Ž .
Ž .
Ž .
Ž .
Ž
.. .
Ž
.
Ž
.
7.476 1 A, cs15.174 1 A, as100.25 1 8, bs
CH3 ethyl , 1.95 s, CH3 . C NMR benzene-d6 d
3
˚
.
Ž
Ž
.
Ž
Ž
99.12 1 8, gs103.72 1 8. Vs788.15 11 A , dcalc
s
142.4, 140.6 C6 H4 , 136.5 C5H4 ipso , 129.1 CH of
C6 H4 , 127.7 CH of C6 H4 , 113.1 CH of C5H4 ,
1.602 Mg my3, Zs2, absorption coefficients1.016
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
mmy1, F 000 s388. Of the 2942 reflections collected
Ž
.
Ž
Ž
.
Ž
.
.
109.5 CH of C5H4 , 59.4 NCH2 , 47.6, 44.3
Ž
.
Ž
..
Ž
Ž
.
2105 were unique Rint s0.0160 . The structure was
NCH2 ethyl , 29.3 CH2–C–N , 21.2 CH3 , 15.8,
..
Ž
Ž
Ž
solved by direct methods using SHELXS-96 Sheldrick,
15.2 N–C–CH3 ethyl .
.
1990 . All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with
5
(
anisotropic displacement parameters. Hydrogen atoms
were located from difference Fourier maps and included
in the final refinement with fixed isotropic thermal
3.5. Synthesis of Ti h :s -C 9 H 6 C H 2 C H 2
)( ) ( )
NSO2C6 H4CH3 NMe2
6
2
Ž .
Ž
. Ž
.
0.68 g, 3.0 mmol in
paramenters related to their parent atoms U H s1.2
To a solution of Ti NMe2
4
Ž .
Ž .
Ž
.
Ž
.
U C and U H s1.5 U C–Me for H7abc. Final
b e n z e n e
5
m l
w a s
Ž
a d d e d
eq
eq
Ž .
.
refinement was done by full-matrix least-squares refine-
C9 H7CH2CH2 N H SO2C6 H4CH3 0.94 g, 3.0 mmol
Ž
.
ment using SHELXL-96 Sheldrick, 1996 . Final R
as a solid in small portions over a period of 30 min. The
reaction mixture was refluxed for two days with a slow
stream of argon blowing over the top of the reflux
condenser to remove liberated dimethylamine. The sol-
vent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude
product was subsequently washed with a small amount
of pentane to yield compound 3 1.13 g, 2.52 mmol,
84% as a dark orange solid. An analytically pure
sample could be obtained by precipitation of a toluene
solution with pentane. Anal. Calc. for C22 H29 N3O2 STi:
C, 59.1; H, 6.5; N, 9.4. Found: C, 59.2; H, 6.7; N, 9.0.
w
Ž .
x
indices I)2s I R1 s0.0329, wR2 s0.0895. R in-
Ž
.
dices all data R1 s0.0367, wR2 s0.0920. Tables of
atomic coordinates, thermal parameters, and bond
lengths and angles have been deposited at the Cam-
bridge Crystallographic Data Centre.
Ž
.
Acknowledgements
The work presented in this paper was funded by the
New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and
Technology under contract no. CO8403. The help of Dr.
Ward Robinson, The University of Canterbury,
Christchurch, New Zealand and Dr Graeme Gainsford,
Industrial Reseach Limited with obtaining the crystal
structure of compound 4 is appreciated.
1
3
Ž
.
Ž
H NMR benzene-d6 d 7.85 d, 2H, JH – H s8.0 Hz,
3
.
Ž
.
.
Ž
C6 H4 , 7.27 d, 1H, JH – H s7.3 Hz , 7.20 d, 1H,
3
3
Ž
.
JH – H s7 Hz , 6.93 d, 2H, JH – H s8.0 Hz, C6 H4 ,
3
Ž
.
Ž
.
6.81 m, 2H , 6.19 d, 1H, JH – H s3.1 Hz, indenyl-C5 ,
3
Ž
.
Ž
5.94 d, 2H, JH – H s3.1 Hz, indenyl-C5 , 4.37 m, 1H,
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
NCH , 3.90 m, 1H, NCH , 3.45 s, 6H, NCH3 , 2.71
Ž
.
Ž
.
Ž
m, 1H, CH–C–N , 2.48 s, 6H, NCH3 , 2.33 m, 1H,
CH–C–N , 2.02 s, 3H, CH3 . C NMR benzene-d6
not all aromatic signals observed, d 129.1, 125.2, 124.8,
124.7, 122.1, 117.9 indenyl-C5 CH , 99.6 indenyl-C5
CH , 60.9 N–CH2 , 51.8 NCH3 , 46.9 NCH3 , 27.6
13
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
References
Ž
.
Ž
w x
Ž
.
1
w x
2
T.-F. Wang, T.-Y. Lee, J. Organomet. Chem. 423 1992 31–38.
T.-F. Wang, T.-Y. Lee, Y.-S. Wen, L.-K. Liu, J. Organomet.
.
Ž
.
Ž
Ž
.
Ž
.
Ž
.
.
Ž
.
CH2–C–N , 22.2 CH3 .
Chem. 403 1991 353–358.