treatment (in THF) with excess MeLi (278 °C, 1 h) which gave
a mixture of o-(ethyldimethylsilyl)benzyl alcohol8 (major) and
o-(trimethylsilyl)benzyl alcohol8 (minor).10
Notes and References
† Present address: Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD 21251, USA.
‡ E-mail: phudrlik@fac.howard.edu
§ The IR, 1H NMR and mass spectra were in agreement with the
structure.
Migratory aptitudes in rearrangements of halomethylsilanes
under basic conditions have been correlated with the ability of
the migrating group to stabilize a negative charge.3,4 In our
studies of the rearrangement reactions of g-hydroxysilanes 2,
we found that the phenyl group had a greater migratory aptitude
than the methyl group, as expected.2 Treatment of
g-hydroxysilane 2a with several bases resulted in oxasila-
cyclopentane 3a, the product of phenyl migration; in some
cases, a small amount ( < 5%) of 2-phenyl- 2-ethyl-1-oxa-
2-silacyclopentane, the product of methyl migration, was also
observed. (Treatment of g-hydroxysilane 2a with 2 equiv. of
MeLi in Et2O gave product 4a, presumably by trapping of 3a
with MeLi.)2
The comparison of the migratory aptitudes in the acyclic
system 2a (phenyl migration) with those in the cyclic system 5a
(methyl migration) is very interesting. Perhaps the cyclic
system 8a has geometrical constraints which disfavor aryl
migration. To the extent oxygen would prefer the apical position
in a trigonal bipyramid intermediate (apical entry, electro-
negativity, see 8),11 the Si–Ar bond in the o-benzyl alcohol
system would have to be equatorial. The preference for methyl
migration in 5a suggests that migration is favored by an apical
position of the migrating group in a trigonal bipyramid
intermediate. This work also suggests that o-silylbenzyl alcohol
substrates should be useful for carbon–carbon bond forming
reactions via rearrangements without interference from the aryl
group.
1 For leading references, see P. F. Hudrlik, Y. M. Abdallah, A. K.
Kulkarni and A. M. Hudrlik, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 6552.
2 P. F. Hudrlik, Y. M. Abdallah and A. M. Hudrlik, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1992, 33, 6743 and references cited therein.
3 R. Damrauer, V. E. Yost, S. E. Danahey and B. K. OAConnell,
Organometallics, 1985, 4, 1779.
4 S. L. Aprahamian and H. Shechter, Tetrahedron Lett., 1990, 31,
1089.
5 Although not simultaneously for reactions proceeding with retention of
stereochemistry: R. R. Holmes, Chem. Rev., 1990, 90, 17; A. R.
Bassindale and P. G. Taylor, in The Chemistry of Organic Silicon
Compounds, ed. S. Patai and Z. Rappoport, Wiley, New York, 1989,
part 1, pp. 839–892.
6 I. Fleming, A. Barbero and D. Walter, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 2063.
7 P. F. Hudrlik, Y. M. Abdallah and A. M. Hudrlik, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1992, 33, 6747.
8 Y. M. Hijji, P. F. Hudrlik, C. O. Okoro and A. M. Hudrlik, Synth.
Commun., 1997, 27, 4297.
9 E. Baciocchi, R. Bernini and O. Lanzalunga, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1993, 1691.
10 For other examples of cleavage at silicon by intramolecular alkoxide,
see: C. Ru¨cker, Tetrahedron Lett., 1984, 25, 4349; W. Kirmse and
F. So¨llenbo¨hmer, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1989, 774.
11 Nucleophilic substitution reactions at silicon are felt to occur via apical
entry, and although pseudorotation of the pentacoordinate intermediate
is possible, oxygen is more apicophilic than carbon. See ref. 5 and
C. Chuit, R. J. P. Corriu, C. Reye and J. C. Young, Chem. Rev., 1993,
93, 1371; R. R. Holmes, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 927.
Financial support from the National Science Foundation
(CHE-9505465 and CHE9007879) is gratefully acknow-
ledged.
Received in Corvallis, OR, USA, 16th February 1998; 8/01377B
1214
Chem. Commun., 1998