1712
M. Tandon et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 1709–1712
Introduction of either a F or OMe blockon to the 4
position of the arylpiperazine again highlights the diffi-
culty in maintaining 5-HT1A affinity while increasing
metabolic stability. Although the 4-fluorophenyl analo-
gues (6, 17 and 18) are all potent, none of them have
improved stability relative to 1 or the unsubstituted
phenyl, 19. In contrast, the alternate blocking sub-
stituent 4-OMe of 8, while increasing metabolic stabi-
lity, reduces activity to the unacceptable micromolar
level.
This workand additional analogues provided invalu-
able SAR for the construction and implementation of a
new local CYP3A4 rate model design, which will be
described in detail elsewhere.
Acknowledgements
We thankDrs. Ken Korzekwa and Stuart Russell for
their pADME modeling insight, Dr. Andrew Smellie for
his molecular modeling assistance and Dr. Sheila
DeWitt and Dr. Valery Antonenko for their support of
this project.
We were predominantly interested in modifications to
reduce CYP3A4 metabolism at those sites indicated
to be most labile by our predictive model. However, we
also wanted to explore the role of the substituent in
Region 3. It has recently been suggested that a general
strategy for avoiding CYP2D6 metabolism in com-
pounds related to 1, is to introduce bulky substituents
into Region 3.13
References and notes
1. Rendic, S. Drug Metab. Rev. 2002, 34, 83.
2. (a) Wu, Y.-H.; Rayburn, J. W.; Allen, L. E.; Ferguson,
H. C.; Kissel, J. W. J. Med. Chem. 1972, 15, 477. (b)
Tunicliff, G.; Eison, A. S.; Taylor, D. P., Eds. In Buspir-
one: Mechanismand Clinical Aspects ; Academic Press Inc,
1991.
3. (a) Jones, J. P.; Mysinger, M.; Korzekwa, K. R. Drug
Metab. Dispos. 2002, 30, 7. (b) Korzekwa, K. R.; Jones,
J. P.; Gillette, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7042.
4. (a) Jajoo, H. K.; Mayol, R. F.; LaBudde, J. A.; Blair, I. A.
Drug Metab. Dispos. 1989, 17, 634. (b) Jajoo, H. K.;
Mayol, R. F.; LaBudde, J. A.; Blair, I. A. Drug Metab.
Dispos. 1989, 17, 625. (c) Sakr, A.; Andheria, M. J. Clin.
Pharmacol. 2001, 41, 886.
5. Lopez-Rodriguez, M. L.; Ayala, D.; Benhamu, B.; Mor-
cillo, M. J.; Viso, A. Curr. Med. Chem. 2002, 9, 443.
com/products/phys_chem_lab/pka/
7. Lopez-Rodriguez, M. L.; Rosado, M. L.; Benhamu, B.;
Morcillo, M. J.; Fernandez, E.; Schaper, K.-J. J. Med.
Chem. 1997, 40, 1648.
Our findings from this study demonstrate that these
bulky substituents also dramatically affect the metabo-
lism by CYP3A4. Overall stability is greatest when
Region 3 contains 4,4-dimethylpiperidinone, followed
by phthalimide (Table 2) and is least with 3,3-tetra-
methyleneglutarimide (Table 3), as in 1.
A design-make-test paradigm was implemented to
assess the impact of an in silico model of human
CYP3A4 metabolism. We successfully, demonstrated
the use of in silico models for 5-HT1A affinity and
CYP3A4 metabolism. Strategies were found which
maintained 5-HT1A affinity and improved in vitro
CYP3A4 stability within the limits established for the
goals of the project. Key SAR features which emerged
were: (i) the effect of steric crowding around the site of
N-dealkylation negatively affecting the CYP3A4 stabi-
lity, (ii) introduction of a hydroxyl group beta to this
site which increased metabolic stability and (iii) the
previously under appreciated effect of the Region 3
substituent in determining the rate of CYP3A4 meta-
bolism for this general class of arylpiperazine 5HT1A
ligands.
8. Glennon, R. A.; Naiman, N. A.; Pierson, M. E.; Titeler,
M.; Lyon, R. A.; Herndon, J. L.; Misenheimer, B. Drug
Dev. Res. 1989, 16, 335.
9. All new compounds were prepared in a parallel chemistry
fashion, purified by RP-HPLC and characterized by
HPLC-MS.
10. Ishizumi, K.; Kojima, A.; Antoku, F.; Ikutaro, S.; Yosh-
igi, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1995, 43, 2139.
11. For a detailed description of the assay methodology see:
Saraswat, L.; Caserta, K. A.; Laws, K.; Wei, D.; Jones,
S. J.; Adedoyin, A. J. Biomolecular Screening 2003, 8, 544.
12. The method was based on a scintillation proximity assay
previously described but adapted for human 5-HT1A
binding: Kahl, S. D.; Hubbard, F. R.; Sittampalam, G.;
Zock, J. M. J. Biomolecular Screening 1997, 2, 33.
13. Kalgutkar, A. S.; Zhou, S.; Fahmi, O. A.; Taylor, T. J.
Drug Metab. Dispos. 2003, 31, 596.
In general, for close structural analogues of 1 significant
improvements in stability against CYP3A4 were always
at the expense of 5-HT1A affinity except in the case of
the known incorporation of a 5-F substituent into the
pyrimidine ring. Other potent 5-HT1A arylpiperazines
templates such as 2-OMePh had improved CYP3A4
stability and maintained affinity when substituted with a
beta OH.