COMMUNICATIONS
[1] S. F. Martin in The Alkaloids, Vol. 30 (Ed.: A. Brossi), Academic
Press, New York, 1987, pp. 251 ± 376.
[2] F. Viladomat, J. Bastida, C. Codina, W. E. Campbell, S. Mathee,
Phytochemistry 1995, 40, 307 ± 311.
[3] a) L. E. Overman, J. Shim, J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5005 ± 5007; b) ibid.
1993, 58, 4662 ± 4672.
A New Base-Pairing Motif Based on Modified
Guanosines**
Jonathan L. Sessler* and Ruizheng Wang
Watson ± Crick base pairing involving purine and pyrimi-
dine subunits plays a crucial role in regulating the structures
and properties of, for example, duplex DNA and hairpin
RNA. Studying synthetic systems with unconventional bind-
ing modes could serve to extend the genetic alphabet of DNA
and RNA, and produce systems of greater structural diversity,
functionality, and catalytic potential.[1] In this context, modi-
fied systems derived from guanine are of considerable interest
because of their potential antiviral activity and their possibly
unique binding ability.[2] However, the number of such
systems that have been analyzed in terms of their self-
association properties remains limited. One example is 7,9-
dimethylguanine, a species that dimerizes in aqueous solution
with the formation of three hydrogen bonds.[3] A second
example is 5'-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-2',3'-O-isopropylidene
isoguanosine; this forms a tetramer[4] in organic media that is
more stable than the corresponding guanosine tetramer.[5]
Here we report the new guanine derivative 1, which, when
constrained within a rigid framework, self-associates in
organic solution to form an unprecedented tetrameric gua-
nine-containing array (dimer I). What is unique about this
system is that it is held together by a pair of four-point
hydrogen bonds.[6±8]
[4] a) M. Ishizaki, O. Hoshino, Y. Iitaka, Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
7079 ± 7082; b) M. Ishizaki, O. Hoshino, Y. Iitaka, J. Org. Chem. 1992,
57, 7285 ± 7295; c) M. Ishizaki, K. Kurihara, E. Tanazawa, O. Hoshino,
J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1993, 101 ± 110.
[5] a) J. Jin, S. M. Weinreb, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2050 ± 2051; b) J.
Jin, S. M. Weinreb, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5773 ± 5784.
[6] a) W. H. Pearson, D. P. Szura, W. G. Harter, Tetrahedron Lett. 1988,
29, 761 ± 764; b) W. H. Pearson, D. P. Szura, M. J. Postich, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1329 ± 1345; c) W. H. Pearson, M. J. Postich, J.
Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 6354 ± 6357.
[7] For a review of early work in this area, see T. Kauffmann, Angew.
Chem. 1974, 86, 715 ± 727; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1974, 13, 627 ±
639.
[8] For related reactions of a-metalated vinyl sulfides with epoxides, see
a) K. Oshima, K. Shimoji, H. Takahishi, H. Yamamoto, H. Nozaki, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 2694 ± 2695; b) I. Vlattas, L. D. Veccia, A. O.
Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 2008 ± 2010.
[9] a) W. H. Pearson, M. J. Postich, J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5662 ± 5671;
b) W. H. Pearson, F. E. Lovering, Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 9173 ±
9176; c) W. H. Pearson, F. E. Lovering, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
12336 ± 12337.
[10] M. J. Postich, PhD thesis, University of Michigan (USA), 1994.
[11] E. J. Corey, P. L. Fuchs, Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 3769.
[12] P. A. Magriotis, J. T. Brown, M. E. Scott, Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
5047 ± 5050.
[13] While the tin ± lithium exchange and protonation sequence proceeds
via the vinyllithium compound required for the epoxide-opening step
in Scheme 2, it is best generated by deprotonation of purified 17.
[14] K. B. Sharpless, W. Amberg, Y. L. Bennani, G. A. Crispino, J. Hartung,
K.-S. Jeong, H.-L. Kwong, K. Morikawa, Z.-M. Wang, D. Xu, X.-L.
Zhang, J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2768 ± 2771.
[15] a) N. Adje, P. Breuilles, D. Uguen, Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 4631 ±
4634; the method of Takano et al. was used: b) S. Takano, M.
Akiyama, S. Sato, K. Ogasawara, Chem. Lett. 1983, 1593 ± 1596.
[16] Meyers method, as modified by Overman et al., was used: a) F. W.
Collington, A. I. Meyers, J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 3044 ± 3045; b) S. D.
Knight, L. E. Overman, G. Pairaudeau, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
5776 ± 5788.
H
R
H
C
N
N
O
N
N
N
N
H
H
O
N
H
H
N
N
N
N
N
C
N
H
R
H
R
H
H
C
O
N
N
H
N
N
N
N
H
O
C
[17] For the asymmetric dihydroxylation of allylic bromides in with 72% ee
or lower, see H. C. Kolb, Y. L. Bennani, K. B. Sharpless, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1993, 4, 133 ± 141.
[18] M. J. Eis, J. E. Wrobel, B. Ganem, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 3693 ±
3694.
[19] The success of the epoxide opening was very sensitive to the reaction
conditions and the nature of the protecting groups. A discussion will
appear in the full account of this work.
H
H
N
N
N
N
1
N
H
H
R
I
1
O
t-BDMSO
t-BDMSO
R =
O-t-BDMS
[20] We thank Dr. Henry Fales of the National Institutes of Health for
samples of ( )-montanine and ( )-coccinine, and Professor Osamu
Hoshino of the Science University of Tokyo for spectra of montanine.
[21] Transition states leading to trans ring junctures are not considered
based on previous experience.[6b, 9] The alternate chairlike conforma-
tion that may lead to 33 is not shown, since it displays severe 1,3-
diaxiallike interactions.
The synthesis of 1 (Scheme 1) involves initially a Pd-
catalyzed cross-coupling between N2-(N,N-dimethylformami-
dine)-protected 8-bromoguanosine (5) and organostannyl
derivative 4[9] produced in situ from 1,8-diethynylanthracene
(3). This sequence gave the bis(guanosine) derivative 6.
Treatment of 6 with methanolic ammonia at room temper-
ature did not give the expected deprotected bis(guanine)
derivative 2, but rather 1, in which the NMe2 group of 6 is
[*] Prof. J. L. Sessler, R. Wang
Department of Chemisty and Biochemistry
University of Texas
Austin, Texas 78712 (USA)
Fax: (1)512-471-7550
[**] This research was supported by the Robert A. Welch foundation. We
thank Prof. Horst Kessler and Dr. Bing Wang for helpful discussions.
1726
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 1998
1433-7851/98/3712-1726 $ 17.50+.50/0
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, No. 12