4840
J. B. Franciskovich et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 4838–4841
Table 2. Human factor Xa binding affinity and prothrombin time
activity of compounds 8–36
Table 3. Binding affinity of compound 17 for various enzymes
Kass (in 106 L/mol) for 17
a
Enzyme
R
O
fXa
fIIa
35
0.02
NH
NH
t-PA
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Plasmin
Urokinase
Trypsin (bovine)
O
O
N
a Kass represents the apparent association constant as measured by the
methods of Smith et al.13
N
a
Compounds R
Kass
PT
constant of 33 · 106 L/mol. These data suggest that the
specific placement of the substituent in the S1 pocket
is critical. There exists a general correlation between
fXa binding affinity and enhanced plasma anticoagulant
potency (PT) within this set of inhibitors (R2 = 0.54). In
addition, the most active compounds show a high degree
of selectivity versus similar proteases. For example,
compound 17 showed minimal binding to serine prote-
ases involved in hemostasis (fIIa (thrombin), t-PA, plas-
min, and urokinase), and to bovine trypsin (Table 3).
(in 106 L/mol) (lM)
8
Phenyl
Cyclohexyl
1.6
—
—
—
—
—
8
9
0.04
0.90
0.20
0.70
6.3
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
1-Cyclohexenyl
2-Cyclohexenyl
1-Cyclopentenyl
Phenyl(4-Me)
Phenyl(4-OMe)
Phenyl(4-OCHF2)
Phenyl(4-F)
19
1.9
5.0
4.6
6
—
Phenyl(4-Cl)
Phenyl(4-Br)
Phenyl(4-I)
35
1.9
38
14
1.8
6
In summary, structural modification of the S1 binding
element in a carbamate-based series affords human fac-
tor Xa inhibitors that do not contain an amidino func-
tionality, but display both high binding affinity and
anticoagulant potency in human plasma. The most
potent derivatives contain some type of substitution at
the 4 position of the phenyl S1 binding element. These
derivatives also display a high degree of specificity
against similar enzymes. In general, within this series
of inhibitors, there is a correlation between binding
affinity for factor Xa and anticoagulant potency as mea-
sured by prothrombin time (PT).
Phenyl(4-CN)
Phenyl(3-Me)
Phenyl(3-OMe)
Phenyl(3-F)
0.60
—
5.9
3.3
2.5
4.1
1.0
5.1
0.02
0.30
—
10
17
12
—
8
Phenyl(3-Cl)
Phenyl(3-OH)
Phenyl(3-NH2)
Phenyl(2-OMe)
Phenyl(2-Cl)
—
—
Phenyl(3-F, 4-OMe)
Phenyl(3-F, 4-Me)
Phenyl(3-Cl, 4-Me)
Phenyl(2,3-diCl)
46
1.1
5.8
2.3
7
22
5
19
2,3-[Dihydro]benzofuran-5-yl 0.60
—
Acknowledgments
6-Indoyl
5-Cl-furan-2-yl
5-Cl-thiophen-2-yl
54
0.70
33
1.6
—
The authors thank Dr. John J. Masters, Dr. Michael
R. Wiley, Dr. Scott Sheehan, and Dr. Thomas E.
Jackson for their helpful discussions and review of this
manuscript.
2.6
PT is defined as the concentration of compound required to double the
time to clot formation in the prothrombin time assay.
a Kass represents the apparent association constant as measured by the
methods of Smith et al.13
References and notes
These data suggest that substitution in the ortho posi-
tion negatively impacts binding to fXa. The 3,4-disubsti-
tuted compounds display different results when
compared to their 4-substituted counterparts. The 3-flu-
oro-4-methoxy analog (29) has a more than 2-fold high-
er binding affinity than the 4-methoxy compound (14),
whereas the 3-fluoro-4-methyl analog (30) has a binding
affinity similar to the mono-substituted 4-methyl com-
pound (13). Bicyclic groups display mixed results. The
6-indoyl derivative (34) shows the highest binding affin-
ity for fXa of 54 · 106 L/mol and the 2,3-[dihydro]ben-
zofuran-5-yl compound (33) has one of the lowest
affinities of 0.6 · 106 L/mol. Heterocyclic replacements
for the phenyl group display very different effects on
fXa binding. For example, the 5-chloro-furan-2-yl com-
pound (35) has a binding affinity of 0.7 · 106 L/mol and
the 5-chloro-thiophen-2-yl compound (36) has a binding
1. Coleman, R. W.; Marder, V. J.; Salzman, E. W.; Hirsch, J.
In Hemostasis and Thrombosis: Basic Principles and
Clinical Practice; Coleman, R. W., Marder, V. J.,
Salzman, E. W., Hirsh, J., Eds.; J.P. Lippincott: Philadel-
phia, 1994; pp 3–18.
2. Kaiser, B. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2002, 59, 189.
3. Walenga, J. M.; Jeske, W. P. Curr. Opin. Invest. Drugs
2003, 4, 272.
4. Gould, W. R.; Leadley, R. J. Curr. Pharm. Design 2003, 9,
2337.
5. Walenga, J. M.; Jeske, W. P.; Hoppenstedt, D.; Fareed, J.
Method Mol. Med. 2004, 93, 95.
6. Herron, D. K.; Goodson, T., Jr.; Wiley, M. R.; Weir, L.;
Kyle, J. A.; Yee, Y. K.; Tebbe, A. L.; Tinsley, J. M.;
Masters, J. J.; Franciskovich, J. B.; Sawyer, J. S.; Beight,
D. W.; Ratz, A. M.; Hay, L. A.; Milot, G.; Hall, S. E.;
Klimkowski, V. J.; Towner, R. D.; Gifford-Moore, D.;
Craft, T. J.; Smith, G. F. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 859.