12986
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12986-12987
Scheme 1. Salmonella Group E1 O Antigen Biosynthesis
Acceptor Specificity of Salmonella
GDP-Man:rLRha1f3rDGal-PP-Und
â1f4-Mannosyltransferase: A Simplified Assay
Based on Unnatural Acceptors
(upper) and the Corresponding Unnatural ManTâ4 Acceptors
(lower)a
Yongxin Zhao, John B. Biggins, and Jon S. Thorson*
Laboratory for Biosynthetic Chemistry
Molecular Pharmacology & Therapeutics Program
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and
the Sloan-Kettering DiVision
Graduate School of Medical Sciences
Cornell UniVersity, 1275 York AVenue, Box 309
New York, New York 10021
ReceiVed June 30, 1998
The first unique mannosyl transfer in the biosynthesis of the
common core of most Asn-linked eukaryotic glycoproteins is
catalyzed by GDP-R-D-Man:GlcNAcâ1f4GlcNAcâ1f4-PP-Dol
â1f4-mannosyltransferase.1,2 Unfortunately, due to low expres-
sion levels and enzyme lability, the chemical mechanism for this
key reaction remains undetermined. Interestingly, dolichol-
dependent biosynthesis shares striking similarities with bacterial
undecaprenol-dependent glycosylation.3 This relationship, in
conjunction with the superior biochemical and genetic manipu-
latability of bacterial systems, renders prokaryotic mannosyl-
transferases attractive as accessible models for their eukaryotic
counterparts. One such model mannosyltransferase, GDP-R-D-
Man:RRha1f3RGal-PP-Und â1f4-mannosyltransferase (ManTâ4)
is involved in the biosynthesis of the Salmonella group E1
O-antigen repeat unit (2, Scheme 1).4 The biosynthesis of the
natural acceptor for this enzyme, RRha1f3RGal-PP-Und (1), is
initiated by enzyme-catalyzed galactosyl-1-phosphate transfer
from UDP-Gal to undecaprenol phosphate,5 with subsequent loss
of UMP, followed by enzyme-catalyzed rhamnosyl transfer from
TDP-Rha and loss of TDP.6 Of the reagents required for the
biosynthesis of 1, UDP-R-D-Gal:P-Und R-galactose-1-phosphoryl
transferase (Gal-1-PT), TDP-â-L-Rha:Gal-PP-Und 1f3-rham-
nosyltransferase (RhaTR3) and TDP-â-L-Rha are not commercially
available.7 Thus, we report the synthesis of simplified analogues
of 1 (Scheme 1) and compare their abilities to function as ManTâ4
acceptors. In addition to providing a new method for the practical
synthesis of Gram negative cell wall antigens,8 this work reveals
a new quantitative ManTâ4 assay and begins to map acceptor
requirements for this intriguing enzyme.
a Gal-1-PT/UDP-Gal, RhaTR3/TDP-Rha. (b) ManTâ4/GDP-Man. (c)
AgOTf, 1,1,3,3-tetramethylurea, 4-(4-nitrophenyl)-1-butanol, CH2Cl2, 0
°C. (d) NaOMe, MeOH, 20 min. (e) AgOTf, 2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine,
CH2Cl2, -40 °C. (f) Ac2O, pyridine. (g) DMDO, 0 °C, CH2Cl2; 4-(4-
nitrophenyl)-1-butanol, ZnCl2, -78 °C f 20 °C, THF. (h) TBAF, THF.
) 9:1), from bromide 410 and 4-(4-nitrophenyl)-1-butanol, fol-
lowed by Ze´mplen deacylation efficiently provided 6 (85%).
Synthesis of the disaccharide analogue 12 was initiated with
Koenigs-Knorr coupling of glycal 711 and 4 to give 8 (69% R,
R/â ) 10:1).12 The corresponding glycal 9 was epoxidized using
3,3-dimethyldioxirane13 to provide the 1,2-anhydro derivative,
which furnished crystalline 10 (43% R, R/â ) 1:9) in the presence
of zinc chloride and 4-(4-nitrophenyl)-1-butanol.14 Deprotection
provided the potential mannosyltransferase substrate 12 (84% R,
R/â ) 12:1). To test the potential acceptors, 3, 6, and 12 were
individually incubated with GDP-R-D-Man or GDP-R-D-[U-14C]-
Man and extracts from a ManTâ4 overexpressing strain,15 and the
reaction progress was monitored by HPLC.16
Assays of ManTâ4 extracts with 3 or 6 revealed no observed
ManTâ4-catalyzed glycosylation. However, assays containing 12
(retention time of 13.90 min.) unveiled the time-dependent
formation of a new product with a retention time of 12.99 min
(Figure 1a). Molecular weight determination of the new product
was consistent with mannosylation of 12,17 and assays containing
12 in the presence of GDP-[U-14C]Man demonstrated the time-
dependent incorporation of [U-14C]Man into the product peak
The first analogue, p-nitrophenyl-â-L-Rha (3), is commercially
available, whereas Koenigs-Knorr9 synthesis of 5 (64% R, R/â
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jthorson@
sbnmr1.ski.mskcc.org. Fax: (212) 717-3066.
(1) Abbreviations: Asn, asparagine; Dol, dolichol; Gal, D-galactose; GDP,
guanosine diphosphate; Glc, D-glucose; GlcNAc, 2-N-acetyl-D-glucose; Man,
D-mannose; Rha, L-rhamnose (6-deoxy-L-mannose); TDP, thymidine diphos-
phate; UDP, uridine diphosphate; UMP, uridine monophosphate; Und,
undecaprenol.
(2) (a) Hubbard, S. C.; Ivatt, R. J. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 1981, 50, 555-
583. (b) Kornfeld, R.; Kornfeld, S. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 1985, 54, 631-664.
(c) Manzella, S. M.; Hooper, L. V.; Baenziger, J. U. J. Biol. Chem. 1996,
271, 12117-12120. (d) O’Connor, S. E.; Imperiali, B. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3,
803-812.
(3) Bugg, T. D. H.; Brandish, P. E. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1994, 119, 255-
262.
(9) Banoub, J.; Bundle, D. R. Can. J. Chem. 1979, 57, 2091-2097.
(10) (a) Finan, P. A.; Warren, C. D. J. Chem. Soc. 1962, 2823-2824. (b)
Farkas, I.; Menyhart, M.; Bognar, R.; Gross, H. Chem. Ber. 1965, 98, 1419-
1426.
(11) (a) Gordon, D. M.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
659-663. (b) Gervay, J.; Peterson, J. M.; Oriyama, T.; Danishefsky, S. J. J.
Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5465-5468.
(12) The use of 6-O-triisopropylsilyl greatly influenced regioselectivity,
and the use of di-tert-butylpyridine gave slightly higher yields than either
2,4,6-collidine (50-55%) or 1,1,3,3-tetramethylurea (40%). Peracetylated
rhamnal or pertriisopropylsilylated rhamnal failed to give a stable epoxide
product with DMDO. Our rationale to synthesize 12, as opposed to the
4-nitrophenyl disaccharide (not tested), was to provide both a hydrophobic
handle reminiscent of 1 and stability to chromophore hydrolysis under alkaline
assay conditions.
(4) (a) Liu, D.; Haase, A. M.; Lindqvist, L.; Lindberg, A. A.; Reeves, P.
R. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 3408-3413. (b) Wang, L.; Romana, L. R.; Reeves,
P. R. Genetics 1992, 130, 429-443.
(5) Wang, L.; Reeves, P. R. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176, 4348-4356.
(6) (a) Raetz, C. R. H. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 1990, 59, 129-170. (b) Jiang,
X.-M.; Neal, B.; Santiago, F.; Lee, S. J.; Romana, L. K.; Reeves, P. R. Mol.
Microbiol. 1991, 5, 695-713. (c) Schnaitman, C. A.; Kiens, J. P. Microbiol.
ReV. 1993, 57, 655-682.
(13) Halcomb, R. L.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111,
6661-6666.
(14) Galactal coupling in the absence of rhamnose reproducibly furnished
[4-(nitrophenyl)-1-butyl]-â-D-galactopyranoside in >90% yield.
(7) Zhao, Y.; Thorson, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7568-7572.
(8) (a) Robbins, P. W.; Uchida, T. J. Biol. Chem. 1965, 240, 375-383.
(b) Luderitz, O.; Westphal, O. Ang. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1966, 5, 198-210.
10.1021/ja982285+ CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 12/01/1998