178
BONINA ET AL.
With regard to our results, the IDU skin per-
meation enhancement, showed by esters 9 and 10,
could be explained on the basis of their increased
lipophilicity and, probably, their moderate water
solubility with respect to parent drug (1).
7. Ghosh MK, Mitra AK. 1992. Enhanced delivery of
5-iodo-20-deoxyuridine to the brain parenchyma.
Pharm Res 9(9):1173±1176.
8. Ghosh MK, Mitra AK. 1992. Brain parenchymal
metabolism of 5-iodo-20-deoxyuridine and 50-ester
prodrugs. Pharm Res 9(8):1048±1052.
Despite the more lipophilic character of esters
11±13, these derivatives showed lower ¯uxes and
the lack of IDU skin enhancement. These ®ndings
could be attributed to both higher molecular size
and higher ability to form H-bonds (due to more
polyoxyethylene groups), which, as reported in
literature,34,35 could decrease the diffusional
properties of these esters through the skin. Fur-
thermore, the increased lipophilicity of esters
11±13 could result in a reduction of water
solubility, resulting, therefore, in a reduction of
the skin permeation of the esters.
In conclusion, synthesised IDU esters 9±13
proved moderately stable in aqueous media and
were readily hydrolyzed by porcine esterase.
Among all esters 9±13 synthesized, only 9 and
10 seem to penetrate through excised human skin
better than the parent drug (1). Further in vivo
pharmacological studies are planned to investi-
gate the potential use of esters 9 and 10 as dermal
prodrugs of IDU.
9. Narurkar MM, Mitra AK. 1989. Prodrugs of 5-iodo-
20-deoxyuridine for enhanced ocular transport.
Pharm Res 6(10):887±891.
10. Bonina FP, Montenegro L, de Caprariis P, Bous-
quet E, Tirendi S. 1991. 1-Alkylazacycloalkan-2-
one esters as prodrugs of indomethacin for
improved delivery through human skin. Int J
Pharm 77:21±29.
11. Bonina FP, Montenegro L, Guerrera F. 1993.
Naproxen 1-alkylazacycloalkan-2-one esters as
dermal prodrugs: In vitro evaluation. Int J Pharm
100:99±105.
12. Bonina FP, Montenegro L, Trapani G, Franco M,
Liso G. 1995. In vitro evaluation of N-acyllactam
esters of indomethacin as dermal prodrugs. Int J
Pharm 124:45±51.
13. Bonina FP, Montenegro L, de Caprariis P, Pala-
giano F, Trapani G, Liso G. 1995. In vitro and in
vivo evaluation of polyoxyethilene indomethacin
esters as dermal prodrugs. J Controlled Release
34:223±232.
14. Palagiano F, Arenare L, Barbato F, La Rotonda MI,
Quaglia F, Bonina FP, Montenegro L, de Caprariis
P. 1997. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of terpenoid
esters of indomethacin as dermal prodrugs. Int J
Pharm 149:171±182.
REFERENCES
1. Spadari S, Ciarrocchi G, Focher F, Verri A, Maga G,
Arcamone F, Iafrate E, Manzini S, Garbesi A,
Tondelli L. 1995. 5-Iodo-20-deoxy-L-uridine and (E)-
5-(2-bromovinyl)-20-deoxy-L-uridine:Selectivephos-
phorylation by herpes simplex virus type 1 thymi-
dine kinase, antiherpetic activity, and cytotoxicity
studies. Mol Pharmacol 47(6):1231±1238.
2. Touitou E, Segal R, Pisanty S, Milogoldzweig I.
1988. Glycirrhyzin gel as vehicle for idoxuridine
topical preparation: Skin permeation behaviour.
Drug Des Deliv 3(3):267±272.
15. Rimoli MG, Avallone L, de Caprariis P, Galeone A,
Forni F, Vandelli MA. 1999. Synthesis and char-
acterisation of poly(D,L-lactic acid)-idoxuridine con-
jugate. J Controlled Release 58:61±68.
16. Bessodes M, Komiotis D, Antonakis K. 1986.
Rapid and selective detritylation of primary
alcohols using formic acid. Tetrahedron Lett 27:
579.
17. Rautio J, Nevalainen T, Taipale H, Vepsalainen J,
È È
Gynther J, Pedersen T, Jarvinen T. 1999. Synthesis
and in vitro evaluation of aminoacyloxyalkyl esters
of 2-(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl) propionic acid as novel
naproxen prodrugs for dermal drug delivery.
Pharm Res 16(8):1172±1178.
È
3. Sheth NV, McKeough MB, Spruance SL. 1987.
Measurement of the stratum corneum drug reser-
voir to predict the therapeutic ef®cacy of topical
iododeoxyuridine for herpes virus infection.
Invest Dermatol 89(6):598±602.
4. Bravo ML, Auladell C, Navarro C. Evaluation
absorption and safety of idoxuridine after topical
administration. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol
10(11):705±709.
5. BarryBW.1987.Modeofactionofpenetrationenhan-
cers in human skin. J Controlled Release 6: 85±97.
6. Hadgraft J. 1989. Formulation of anti-in¯amma-
tory agents. In: Lowe NJ, Hensby CN, editors. Non-
steroidal Anti-in¯ammatory Drugs. Basel (Switzer-
land): Karger, pp. 21±43.
J
È
È È
18. Jarvinen T, Poikolainen M, Suhonen P, Vepsalai-
nen J, Alaranta S, Urtti A. 1995. Comparison of
enzymatic hydrolysis of pilocarpine prodrugs in
human plasma, rabbit cornea and butyrylcholines-
terase solutions. J Pharm Sci 84:656±660.
19. Lambert WJ. 1993. Modelling oil±water partion-
ing and membrane permeation using reversed-
phase chromatography. J Chromatogr A 656:469±
484.
20. Kligman AM, Christophers E. 1963. Preparation of
isolated sheets of human skin. Arch Dermatol
88:702±705.
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 91, NO. 1, JANUARY 2002