COMMUNICATIONS
New York, 1996, 125; c) F. Barresi, O. Hindsgaul, J. Carbohydr. Chem.
1995, 14, 1043; d) R. R. Schmidt, W. Kinzy, Adv. Carbohydr. Chem.
Biochem. 1994, 50, 21; e) K. Toshima, K. Tatsuta, Chem. Rev. 1993, 93,
1503. Glycosylsulfoxide donors: L. Yan, D. Kahne, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 9239. 1-Hydroxyglycosyl donors: B. A. Garcia, J. A. Poole,
D. Y. Gin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7597. Glycal donors: S. J.
Danishefsky, M. T. Bilodeau, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1482; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1380. 1,2-Anhydroglycosyl donors: Y.
Du, F. Kong, Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 427.
6-linked orthoester was formed as the sole product in almost
quantitative yield. Its acetylation to 9 followed by rearrange-
ment readily furnished 10. With methyl 6-O-benzoyl-a-d-
mannopyranoside[11] (11) as the acceptor, the 3-linked or-
thoester 12 was obtained in a high yield. Its acetylation to 13
followed by rearrangement, or its rearrangement to 14
followed by acetylation produced the same compound 15,
indicating that both orthoester formation and rearrangement
were regio- and stereoselective. The same 3-selectivity was
obtained with 6-O-benzoyl-1,2-O-ethylidene-b-d-mannopyr-
anose (16) as the acceptor, when the 1,3-linked disaccharide
19 was formed in a satisfactory yield.
Since the rearrangement of 12 to 14 (82%) and the
rearrangement of 13 to 15 (85%) afforded the respective
disaccharides in similar yields, and the rearrangement of 4
afforded the trisaccharide 5, also in a high yield, we
rationalized the mechanism of the rearrangement as shown
in Scheme 4. When TMSOTf was added to the solution of 12
in dichloromethane, selective bond cleavage of the orthoester
linkage rather than 2- or 4-OH bond cleavage occurred to give
a closely associated ion pair (form A). When this ion pair
reaches an appropriate six-membered ring geometry (form B)
rearrangement occurs to afford the required disaccharide 14.
We still consider that steric factors are mainly responsible for
the high regioselectivity in orthoester formation.[4]
[4] a) W. Wang, F. Kong, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5744; b) F. Kong, W.
Wang, Chinese Pat. Appl. 971257788.4; c) F. Kong, W. Wang, Chinese
Pat. Appl. 98103242.7; d) B. Ernst, A. De Mesmaeker, B. Wagner, T.
Winkler, Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 6167; e) J. Banoub, P. Boullanger, M.
Potier, G. Descotes, Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 4145; f) B. M. Dahlin, P. J.
Garegg, R. Johansson, B. Samuelsson, U. Orn, Acta Chem. Scand. Ser.
B 1981, 35, 669; g) J. Banoub, D. R. Bundle, Can. J. Chem. 1979, 57,
2091; h) T. Ogawa, M. Matsui, Carbohydr. Res. 1976, 51, C13; i) S. E.
Zurabyan, M. M. Tikhomirov, V. A. Nesmeyanov, A. Y. Khorlin,
Carbohydr. Res. 1973, 26, 117; j) G. Wulff, W. Kruger, Carbohydr. Res.
1971, 19, 139; k) N. K. Kochetkov, A. F. Bochkov, T. A. Sokolovskaya,
V. J. Snyatkova, Carbohydr. Res. 1971, 16, 17; l) N. K. Kochetkov, A. J.
Khorlin, A. F. Bochkov, Tetrahedron 1967, 23, 693.
[5] a) D. K. Mandal, L. Bhattacharyya, S. H. Koenig, R. D. Brown, S.
Oscarson, C. F. Brewer, Biochemistry 1994, 33, 1157; b) D. K. Mandal,
C. F. Brewer, Biochemistry 1992, 32, 5116; c) B. A. Williams, M. C.
Chervenak, E. J. Toone, J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 22907; d) M. C.
Chervenak, E. J. Toone, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10533.
[6] a) M. W. Francoise, J. R. Brisson, J. P. Carver, J. J. Krepinsky,
Carbohydr. Res. 1982, 103, 15; b) T. Ogawa, K. Katano, M. Matsui,
Carbohydr. Res. 1978, 64, C3; c) J. Arnarp, J. Lonngren, Acta Chem.
Scand. Ser. B 1978, 32, 696.
[7] Typical conditions for orthoester preparation: To a
stirred solution of 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-a-d-mannopyr-
anosyl bromide (1, 1.02 g, 2.5 mmol), 2,4-lutidine
(276 mL, 2.4 mmol), and 1,2-O-ethylidene-(R,S)-b-d-
mannopyranose (2, 206 mg, 1 mmol) in dichlorome-
thane (20 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere was added
AgOTf (565 mg, 2.2 mmol) in a dark room. The reaction
was carried out at room temperature and monitored by
TLC (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, 1/1.5). After com-
pletion of the reaction the mixture was partitioned
Scheme 4.
between dichloromethane and water, the organic phase
was concentrated, dried, and subjected to column chromatography on
silica gel with petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (1/1) as the eluent to give
the trisaccharide diorthoester 3 (91% yield based on acceptor 2) as the
sole product. The procedure for the preparation of the disaccharide
orthoesters is the same as described above except for the amounts of
the acetoglycobromide donors (ꢀ1.2 equiv) and the promoters
(ꢀ1.2 equiv). Typical rearrangement conditions: To a stirred solution
of sugar-sugar orthoester 4 (580 mg, 0.64 mmol) in dichloromethane
(10 mL) was added TMSOTf (12 mL, 0.1 equiv) under nitrogen
atmosphere and the reaction was monitored by TLC (petroleum
ether/ethyl acetate, 1/1). After completion of the reaction the mixture
was treated with triethylamine (20 mL), filtered, and the filtrate was
washed with CH2Cl2. The combined solution was washed with 1m HCl
(10 mL), saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (10 mL), and aqueous NaCl
(2 Â 10 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated. The
residue was subjected to column chromatography on silica gel with
petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (1/1) as the eluent to give 5 (510 mg,
88%).
In summary, here we present a very effective regio- and
stereoselective glycosylation method with 1,2-O-ethylidenat-
ed mannose or partially protected mannosides as glycosyl
acceptors and simple acetobromo sugars as the glycosyl
donors by an orthoester formation/rearrangement procedure.
A number of 1 !6-, 1 !3-, and 3,6-branched oligosaccharides
with exclusive 1,2-trans linkage were readily synthesized by
the new strategy. This approach, in terms of yields, simplicity,
and efficiency, will be a general one for the synthesis of
mannose-containing oligosaccharides.
Received: November 10, 1998 [Z12648IE]
German version: Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 1330 ± 1333
Keywords: oligosaccharides ´ protecting groups ´ rearrange-
ments ´ synthetic methods
1
[8] Physical data and H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 258C, TMS) data for
3 ± 6. 3: m.p. 110 ± 1128C; [a]D 5.2 (c 1.5 trichloromethane);
1H NMR: d 5.54, 5.50 (2d, 3J (H1'(1''),H2'(2'')) 2.7 Hz, 2H; H-1', 1''),
5.30 ± 5.15 (m, H-1, 3', 3'', 4', 4'', 6H; CH3CH), 4.75, 4.63 (2dd, 3J
[1] A. Kobata in Biology of Carbohydrates, Vol. 2 (Ed.: V. Ginsburg), IRL
Press, New York, 1980, pp. 87 ± 161.
3
(H2',H3') 3.8 Hz, J (H2'',H3'') 3.9 Hz, 2H; H-2', 2''), 4.23 ± 4.13 (m,
3
3
4H; H-6', 6''), 4.06 (dd, J (H1,H2) 2.4 Hz, J (H2,H3) 3.6 Hz, 1H;
H-2), 3.84 ± 3.68 (m, 6H; H-3, 4, 5', 5'', 6), 3.40 ± 3.35 (m, 1H; H-5),
2.11, 2.10, 2.07, 2.07, 2.06, 2.05 (6s, 18H; 6 CH3CO), 1.85, 1.74 (2s, 6H;
2 CH3CO), 1.47 (d, 3J (H,H) 5.0 Hz, 3H; CH3CH). 4: m.p. 135 ±
1388C; [a]D 0.4 (c 0.1, trichloromethane); 1H NMR: d 5.49,
5.43 (2d, 3J (H1',H2'), 3J (H1'',H2'') 2.8 Hz, 2.6 Hz, 2H; H-1', 1''),
5.30 ± 5.16 (m, 6H; H-1, 3', 3'', 4', 4'', CH3CH), 5.12 (t, 3J (H,H)
[2] a) T. Kanbe, J. E. Cutler, Infect. Immun. 1994, 62, 1662; b) M.
Stratford, Yeast 1992, 8, 635; c) R. D. Nelson, N. Shibata, R. P.
Podzorski, M. J. Herron, Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1991, 4, 1; d) R. P.
Podzorski, G. R. Gray, R. D. Nelson, J. Immunol. 1990, 144, 707.
[3] General reviews: a) S. Hanessian, Preparative Carbohydrate Chem-
istry, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997, Chapters 12 ± 22; b) S. H. Khan,
R. A. O'Neil, Modern Methods in Carbohydrate Synthesis, Harwood,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, No. 9
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 1999
1433-7851/99/3809-1249 $ 17.50+.50/0
1249