Rate of Bond Shift in Arylcyclooctatetraenes
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 66, No. 16, 2001 5575
Ta ble 2. 13C Ch em ica l Sh ifts for Ar ylCOTs in THF -d 8
a n d Der ived σ Con sta n ts
a
+ a
compound substituent δ C2
δ C9
σp
σp
σ13 a
1a
1b
2
NO2
H
COT
OCH3
132.8 147.9
126.7 141.0
128.7 140.0
0.78
0
0.74
0
1.01
0
0.15b
0.1b
0.1b
1c
125.7 132.5 -0.27 -0.65 -0.74
2
2-/2K+
COT2-/2K+ 122.2 129.4 -0.7b -1.0b -1.1b
a
b
Reference 27d unless indicated otherwise. This work; (0.1.
F igu r e 1. HF/3-21G-optimized GS (left) and RI TS (right) of
1b.
benzenes,22 19F in para-disubstituted benzenes,23 and 13C
at the â position in substituted styrenes.24 To address
the possibility that some substituent effects are too small
to exert an influence on bond shift, the 13C NMR spectra
for 1a -c, 2, and 22-/2K+ were fully assigned in order to
compare the relative magnetic and electronic environ-
ments of the â and para carbons (C2 and C9, respectively)
in these compounds.
Due to the distance of C9 and C2 from the position of
substitution, the chemical shifts of these carbons (espe-
cially C2) should primarily reflect resonance (π delocal-
ization) effects of the substituents on these carbons, as
opposed to inductive and/or electric field effects. This
qualitative interpretation of 13C chemical shifts in aro-
matic systems follows interpretations by previous authors
who have concluded that 13C chemical shifts are useful
probes of π-electron density.24
The change in chemical shift for C9 (∆δC9) on going
from 1a to 1c is 15.4 ppm (Table 2). This corresponds to
a difference in charge density that does not manifest itself
in a measurable difference in kBS (Table 1). Conversely,
∆δC9 on going from 1c to 22-/2K+ is only 3.1 ppm, yet
the rate constant for bond shift increases by over 6-fold.
Similarly, ∆δC2 on going from 1a to 1c is 7.1 ppm while
δC2(1c) - δC2(22-/2K+) is only 3.5 ppm, yet the rate
constant for bond shift is appreciably increased relative
to 1b only in the dianion. This analysis appears to
preclude the explanation that the rate of bond shift in
1a -c and 2 is unchanged because electronic effects are
intrinsically too small while the COT2- ring in 22-/2K+
is a much superior donor. Note that these measurements
reflect electronic effects in the GS, and it is not known
whether a similar trend applies to the TS.
included in the present study, one cannot expect to get
more than an approximate correlation with even a single-
parameter, let alone a DSP, treatment. Average values
of σp, σp+, and σ13 for p-COT and p-COT2-/2K+ obtained
by interpolation or extrapolation of the correlation lines
for plots of δC2 and δC9 against the corresponding σ
values for the p-phenyl substituents in 1a -c are given
in Table 2. The values derived using δC2 do not vary by
more than 0.15 from those using δC9 and the correlations
+
involving σp and σp are comparable. The NMR-derived
parameter σ13 has only been defined for the â carbon of
styrenes.27d
The derived σ values indicate that COT2-/2K+ in THF-
d8 is only a moderately stronger donor than methoxy in
the GS. However, substituent constants for COT2- are
undoubtedly dependent on the cation and the solvent, i.e.,
on the degree and type of ion pairing.
Com p en sa tin g Effects in th e Gr ou n d a n d Tr a n si-
tion Sta tes. To assess both steric and electronic factors,
HF/3-21G(*)29 geometry optimizations and harmonic fre-
quency analyses30 were performed on the GS and RI TS
of 1a -c, 2, and 22-/2K+ (Figure 1 and Table 3). The RI
TS (Scheme) is a reasonable model for steric interactions
in the BS TS, which was not calculated owing to the large
multiconfigurational wave function necessary to repre-
sent it accurately.6,31,32
Two models were investigated for 22-/2K+, the first of
which involved a complete geometry optimization of the
(27) (a) Relles, H. M.; Schluenz, R. W. J . Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 1742.
(b) Posner, T. B.; Hall, C. D. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1976, 729.
(c) Corne´lis, A.; Lambert, S.; Laszlo, P.; Schaus, P. J . Org. Chem. 1981,
46, 2130. (d) Slater, C. D.; Robinson, C. N.; Bies, R.; Bryan, D. W.;
Chang, K.; Hill, A. W.; Moore, W. H., J r.; Otey, T. G.; Poppelreiter, M.
L.; Reisser, J . R.; Stablein, G. E.; Waddy, V. P., III.; Wilkinson, W. O.;
Wray, W. A. J . Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 4125. (e) Aun, C. E.; Clarkson, T.
J .; Happer, D. A. R. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1990, 645.
(28) Datta, S.; De, A.; Bhattacharyya, S. P.; Medhi, C.; Chakravarty,
A. K.; Brunskill, J . S. A.; Fadoujou, S.; Fish, K. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1988, 1599.
(29) (a) Binkley, J . S.; Pople, J . A.; Hehre, W. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1980, 102, 939. (b) Gordon, M. S.; Binkley, J . S.; Pople, J . A.; Pietro,
W. J .; Hehre, W. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 2797. (c) Pietro, W.
J .; Francl, M. M.; Hehre, W. J .; DeFrees, D. J .; Pople, J . A.; Binkley,
J . S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 5039. (d) Dobbs, K. D.; Hehre, W.
J . J . Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 359.
(30) Frisch, M. J .; Trucks, G. W.; Head-Gordon, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Wong, M. W.; Foresman, J . B.; J ohnson, B. G.; Schlegel, H. B.; Robb,
M. A.; Replogle, E. S.; Gomperts, R.; Andreas, J . L.; Raghavachari,
K.; Binkley, J . S.; Gonzalez, C.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J .; DeFrees, D.
J .; Baker, J .; Stewart, J . J . P.; Pople, J . A. GAUSSIAN 92, Revision A;
Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1992.
(31) Since Karadakov et al. found that the CASSCF/6-31G*//HF/6-
31G correlation energy for the D4h RI TS of COT is only 3% greater
than that for the D2d GS, we conclude that relative values of ∆ERI can
be reliably calculated at the HF level of theory; Karadakov, P. B.;
Gerratt, J .; Cooper, D. L.; Raimondi, M. J . Phys. Chem. 1995, 99,
10186.
A more quantitative measure of the substituent effect
of p-COT and p-COT2-/2K+can be obtained by plotting
the chemical shifts in Table 2 against appropriate Ham-
mett-type substituent constants. Previous workers have
reported excellent correlations of σ constants, particularly
+ 25
σp
,
with 13C chemical shifts for the para carbon of
substituted benzenes21,24b,26 and the â carbon of substi-
tuted styrenes.27
Dual substituent parameter (DSP) treatments have
also been employed for these nuclei with good success.23,28
However, in view of the minimal number of substituents
(22) Taft, R. W.; Price, E.; Fox, I. R.; Lewis, I. C.; Andersen, K. K.;
Davis, G. T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 3146 and references cited.
(23) Craik, D. J .; Brownlee, R. T. C. Prog. Phys. Org. Chem. 1983,
14, 1 and references cited.
(24) (a) Lauterbur, P. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1961, 274. (b) Spiesecke,
H.; Schneider, W. G. J . Chem. Phys. 1961, 35, 731. (c) Hehre, W. J .;
Taft, R. W.; Topsom, R. D. Prog. Phys. Org. Chem. 1976, 12, 159. (d)
Ewing, D. F. In Correlation Analysis in Chemistry. Recent Advances;
Chapman, N. B., Shorter, J ., Eds.; Plenum: New York, 1978; Chapter
8.
(25) Swain, C. G.; Lupton, E. C., J r. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90,
4328.
(26) (a) Nelson, G. L.; Levy, G. C.; Cargioli, J . D. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1972, 94, 3089. (b) Schulman, E. M.; Christensen, K. A.; Grant, D. M.;
Walling, C. J . Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 2686.
(32) (a) Wenthold, P. G.; Hrovat, D. A.; Borden, W. T.; Lineberger,
W. C. Science 1996, 272, 1456. (b) Koseki, S.; Toyota, A. J . Phys. Chem.
A 1997, 101, 5712. (c) Glukhovtsev, M. N.; Bach, R. D.; Laiter, S. J .
Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 1997, 417, 123. (d) Andre´s, J . L.; Castan˜o,
O.; Morreale, A.; Palmeiro, R.; Gomperts, R. J . Chem. Phys. 1998, 108,
203.