P.N. Rao et al. / Steroids 64 (1999) 205–212
209
(2x) and brine. The combined methylene chloride extracts
were dried over sodium sulfate, filtered, and evaporation of
the solvent gave 11.2 g of a dark oil.
84.21 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred at 0°C
for 1 h. The mixture was filtered and the filter pad was
washed with methanol. The filtrate was diluted with 10%
sodium thiosulfate solution and the aqueous mixture was
extracted with methylene chloride (3x). The methylene
chloride extracts were washed with water and brine, com-
bined, and dried over sodium sulfate. Evaporation of the
solvent gave 9.72 g of a stable brown foam. The material
was chromatographed (10% acetone/methylene chloride) to
afford 3.88 g (50%) of CDB-3877 6. A sample was recrys-
tallized from methylene chloride/hexanes to provide an an-
alytical sample, mp ϭ 239–240°C (dec.).
The crude material from above was diluted with ethanol
(100 ml) and 10% sulfuric acid (20 ml) was added and the
mixture was heated to reflux for 1 h. The solvent was
removed in vacuo, diluted with water, and made basic with
concentrated ammonium hydroxide. The mixture was ex-
tracted with methylene chloride. The methylene chloride
extracts were washed with water (3x), brine, combined, and
dried over sodium sulfate. After filtering, evaporation of the
solvent gave 7.3 g of a black oil. The crude material was
purified via flash chromatography (5% acetone/methylene
chloride) to afford 0.4 g of 17b as a green foam. The
material was recrystallized from ethyl acetate to give 0.25 g
(12%), mp ϭ 81–83°C.
NMR (300 MHz) ␦ 0.37 (s, 18-CH3), 2.10 (s, 17␣-OAc),
2.17 (s, COCH3), 2.87 (s, NHCH3), 4.45 (d, J ϭ 11 Hz,
11␣-H), 5.83 (s, C-4 H), 6.57 and 7.02 (d, J ϭ 9 Hz,
AA’BB’ of aromatic H) ppm.
NMR (90 MHz) ␦ 0.43 (s, 18-CH3), 2.23 (s, 21-CH3),
2.78 (s, -NHCH3), 4.40 (br. d, J ϭ 7.5 Hz, 1 H, 11-CH),
5.78 (s, 1 H, 4-CH), 6.76 (d of d, J ϭ 39 Hz, J’ ϭ 9 Hz, 4
H) ppm.
FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): 3417, 2891, 1729, 1708,
1660, 1604, 1581 cmϪ1
.
MS (m/z): 461 (Mϩ), 120, 107 (base).
Analysis: for C29H35NO4⅐0.2 CH2Cl2 Calc: C 73.31; H
7.41; N 2.93. Found: C 73.13 H 7.60; N 3.08.
Note: Prolonged drying at elevated temperatures failed to
remove traces of methylene chloride.
FTIR:
3537, 3408, 3294, 2952, 1730, 1704, 1657,
.
max
and 1642 cmϪ1
2.9. 17␣-Acetoxy-11-(4-N-acetyl, N-methylaminophenyl)-
19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione 18b
2.11. 17-Hydroxy-17␣-propynyl-(4-N-methylamino-
phenyl)-estra-4,9-dien-3-one (RU-42 633) 2 [6]
In dry glassware, trifluoroacetic anhydride (1.3 ml, 9.2
mmol) and glacial acetic acid (0.5 ml, 8.7 mmol) were
added to dry methylene chloride (4.0 ml). The mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 30 min. Solid p-toluenesul-
fonic acid monohydrate (0.082 g, 0.43 mmol) was added
and the mixture was chilled to 0°C. A solution of the steroid
17b (0.2 g, 0.43 mmol) in dry methylene chloride (1.0 ml)
was added and the mixture was stirred at 0°C for 20 min.
Saturated potassium carbonate solution (ca. 3.0 ml) was
added dropwise until cessation of CO2 evolution was ob-
served. The mixture was diluted with water and extracted
with methylene chloride. The organic extracts were washed
with water (2x), brine, combined, dried (Na2SO4), filtered
and concentrated in vacuo to give 0.22 g of an oil. NMR
analysis indicated this material to be diacetate 18b. Tritu-
ration of the residue with pentane gave 0.15g of a solid
(69.3%).
Similar treatment of RU-38 486 with iodine-calcium
oxide in THF-methanol, as described above, gave RU-42
633 2 in 82% yield as a stable foam.
NMR (300 MHz) ␦ 0.552 (s, 18-CH3), 1.894 (s, ϵ
CCH3), 2.813 (s, -NCH3), 4.340 (d, J ϭ 6.6 Hz, 11␣-H),
5.756 (s, C-4 H), 6.545 and 6.971 (d, AA’BB’ of aromatic
H) ppm.
FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance): 3380, 2945, 1656, 1614,
1518 cmϪ1
.
MS (m/e): 415 (Mϩ), 266, 120, 107 (base).
Analysis: for C28H33NO2⅐0.3 CH2Cl2 Calc: C 77.06; H
7.68; N 3.18. Found: C 77.28; H 7.97; N 3.33.
Note: Prolonged drying at elevated temperatures failed to
remove traces of methylene chloride.
2.12. 17␣-Acetoxy-11-(4-N-methyl, N-tritiomethyl-
aminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-dien-3-one 8
NMR (90 MHz) ␦ 0.3 (s, 18-CH3), 2.10, 2.13, and 2.23
(s, 3 H, 21-CH3, -OAc, or NAc), 3.23 (s, NCH3), 4.53 (br.
d, J ϭ 6.7 Hz, 1 H, 11-CH), 5.83 (s, 1 H, 4-CH), 7.21 (d of
d, J ϭ 13.5 Hz, J’ ϭ 9 Hz, 4 H) ppm.
A solution containing CDB-3877 6 (2.0 mg, 4.8 nmol),
3
DMF (0.5 ml), and H methyl iodide (100 mCi, in 0.15 ml
FTIR:
2946, 1730, 1711, 1664, and 1604 cmϪ1
.
of THF; specific activity 80 Ci/mmol) was heated with
stirring at 70°C for 90 h in a 1.0 ml sealed tube. After
max
3
2.10. 17␣-Acetoxy-11-(4-N-methylaminophenyl)-19-
norpregna-4,9-dien-3-one (CDB-3877) 6 [5]
removal of unreacted methyl iodide H under vacuum, the
reaction mixture was first purified by prep TLC (silica gel)
using hexane/acetone (3:1) as the solvent system. The band
corresponding to N-tritiomethyl CDB-2914 was identified
by exposing the TLC plate to X-ray film. The correct band
was cut from the plate and eluted from the silica gel using
ethanol to give 10 mCi. The product was further purified via
Calcium oxide (8.03 g, 143.14 mmol) was added to a
well stirred THF/methanol (100 ml) solution of CDB-2914
5 (8.0 g, 16.84 mmol) and the mixture was chilled in an ice
bath. A THF/methanol (20 ml) solution of iodine (21.37 g,