total synthesis of a dysidavarone-type natural product
and unequivocally confirms the full 3D architecture of
this class of compounds. Furthermore, the convergent
sequence was readily scalable and enabled more detailed
biological evaluation of dysidavarone A revealing potent
antibacterial and antiproliferative activities as well as
specific morphological changes of treated cells.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Benzyl Bromide 3
Scheme 1. Retrosynthesis Analysis of Dysidavarone A
original work. Recrystallization from n-pentane raised the
ee to excellent 99.9%. As shown in Scheme 3, the stereo-
selective coupling of the two building blocks 3 and 4 by
a reductive alkylation under Birch conditions proceeded
with good yields (72%) and furnished the desired diaster-
eomer 2 with high selectivities (dr >20:1).15,16
The results of the pivotal intramolecular R-arylation
of ketone 2 are summarized in Table 1. No conversion
was observed in initial studies with catalytic amounts
of PdCl2(PPh3)2 and (DtBPF)PdCl2,18 while Pd(OAc)2
17
As shown in Scheme 1, our retrosynthetic plan relied
on protected phenol 2 as a late-stage intermediate,
which was planned to be converted to the tetracyclic core
of 1 by a challenging intramolecular palladium-catalyzed
R-arylation.10 The quinone functionality in turn was ex-
pected to arise at a late step of the route after liberation
of the labile phenol by oxidation. Intermediate 2 in turn
should be generated through a stereoselective reductive
alkylation under Birch type conditions from known
Wieland-Miescher type ketone 411 with orcinol 5 derived
benzyl bromide 3.
As shown in Scheme 2, the synthesis of aromatic building
block 3 started from orcinol 5, which was monoethylated
with diethylsulfate12 followed by selective bromination of
the aromatic core with NBS.13 After protection of the
remaining phenol as a tert-butyl ether,14 the benzylic position
was brominated with NBS/AIBN.
in the absence of ligands only led to degradation.19 Also,
a combination of Pd(OAc)2 with P(t-Bu)320 was tried but
again no conversion was observed. It was assumed that the
sterical hindrance of the two bulky residues in the ortho
position of the bromine might prevent the reaction. There-
fore, we attempted to cleave the tert-butyl ether to evaluate
the unprotected phenol. However, these attempts likewise
failed due to the high instability of the liberated phenol.
Finally, a combination of Pd(OAc)2with ligand 9, which
was developed by the group of Buchwald, led to a success-
ful ring-closure in good yields (66%) considering the
complexity and high steric hindrance of the substrate.19
Catalyst-loadings of 10 mol % were required to achieve
complete conversion. Use of XPhos-precatalyst21 also
resulted in product formation, but in lower yields and
(15) The stereochemistry of 2 was confirmed by NMR methods:
The 1,2-dioxolane protected Wieland-Miescher type
ketone 4 was prepared in three steps in enantiopure form
according to a previously reported procedure involving
an organo-catalyzed Hajos-Parish-Eder-Sauer-Wiechert
type aldol condensation.11 The ee of the crude product of
the condensation as determined by chiral HPLC analysis
was very good (95%) despite the use of (L)-R-Phenylalanin
in contrast to (L)-β-Phenylalanin, which was used in the
(16) This type of reductive alkylation often served as key-step in the
total synthesis of sesquiterpenoidal quinones and hydroquinones albeit
with simpler aromates. For some examples, see: (a) Sarma, A. S.;
Chattopadhyay, P. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 1727–1731. (b) An, J.;
Wiemer, D. F. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8775–8779. (c) Stahl, P.; Kissau,
L.; Mazitschek, R.; Huwe, A.; Furet, P.; Giannis, A.; Waldmann, H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11586–11593. (d) Sakurai, J.; Oguchi, T.;
Watanabe, K.; Abe, H.; Kanno, S.; Ishikawa, M.; Katoh, T. Chem.;
Eur. J. 2008, 14, 829–837.
(17) Muratake, H.; Natsume, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7581–
7582.
(18) Grasa, G. A.; Colacot, T. J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5489–5492.
(19) Fox, J. M.; Huang, X.; Chieffi, A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 1360–1370.
(10) For a review on metal-catalyzed R-arylation of carbonyl see:
(a) Johansson, C. C. C.; Colacot, T. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49,
676–707. (b) Bellina, F.; Rossi, R. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 1082–1146.
(11) Hagiwara, H.; Uda, H. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 2308–2311.
(12) Bredereck, H.; Hennig, I.; Rau, W. Chem. Ber. 1953, 86, 1085–
1095.
(13) Tatsuta, K.; Furuyama, A.; Yano, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Ogura, T.;
Hosokawa, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 4036–4039.
(14) Holcombe, J. L.; Livinghouse, T. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 111–
113.
(20) Kawatsura, M.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
1473–1478.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 4, 2013
965