R1
O
OPMB
Me
R2
O
i
ii
CO2Me
OBn
i
MeO
(+)-6
MeO
TBDMSO
OBn
OBn
OBn
TBDMSO
Me
Me
Me
17
(–)-7a R1 = OH, R2 = H
(+)-7b R1 = H, R2 = OH
16
(–)-8
ii
iii
OTBDMS
CO2Me
OPMB
OPMB
OPMB
MeO
vi
iv, v
AcO
HO
O
HO
HO
O
OBn
TBDMSO
Me
(+)-18
S
O
OBn
OBn
OBn
O
Me
11
Me
Me
Scheme 4 Reagents and conditions: i, LDA, HMPA (25 equiv.),
NCCO2Me, 278 ? 220 °C; ii, TBDNCl, imidazole, DMAP (40%, 2
steps).
(–)-10
9
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i, DIBAL-H (1.5 equiv.), THF. 278 °C
(99%, 3.5+1 dr); ii, KH, (2.2 equiv.) PMBCl, DMF, 0 °C (95%); iii,
K2OsO2·H2O, NMO, acetone–H2O (3+1) (90%, 10+1 dr); iv, SOCl2, Et3N,
CH2Cl2, 0 °C; v, RuCl3·H2O, NaIO4, CCl4–H2O–MeCN (1+1.4+1) (85%, 2
steps); vi, CsOAc (5 equiv.), DMF, 40 °C, then H2SO4, THF (99%, 9+1
dr).
the cleavage was performed with DDQ, which quickly removed
the PMB group in good yield (93%) and gave the free C-1
alcohol 15. Mild oxidation under Swern conditions produced
the desired ketone 16 (91%).
The enolate of 16 was generated in the presence of HMPA10
as cosolvent and warmed to 240°C before quenching with
NCO2Me. Enolate formation generated small amounts of the
epimerized 16 and elimination products. However, the desired
product 17 was the major constituent of the mixture, along with
still significant quantities of undesired products. It appears from
all of these experiments that the source of epimerization was not
initial generation of the incorrect enolate, but was due to facile
proton transfer processes after the addition of the electrophile.
Having obtained a quantity of the carboxylated derivative,
17, attention was turned to isolation of the enol ester 18, the
intended target of this study (Scheme 4). Attempts to silylate 17
gave an enol ether, which was poorly characterized. By
combining the two steps from 16 to 18 (no attempt was made to
purify the b-keto ester 17), the crude material was directly
silylated and gave an overall yield of 18 of 40%. With the
acquisition of 18, all of the correct regio- and stereo-chemical
features have been installed and the substituents at the 4- and
5-positions are in a position to further extend the synthesis to
viridenomycin itself.
satisfactory (77%) yield for the two steps. Caesium acetate
opening of the sulfate 10 occurred with high regioselectivity
(10+1) and yield (99%) to furnish the acetoxy alcohol 11 as the
major regioisomer. In this case, the regioisomeric products were
not separable and thus the mixture was carried forward.
Protection of the alcohol 11 (Scheme 3) was accomplished in
excellent yield (96%) with TBDMSCl and imidazole affording
the acetate 12 which was removed by K2CO3 in MeOH to give
a quantitative crude yield of 13. Methyl ether formation was
accomplished on crude 13 in the usual manner to furnish
methoxy derivative 14. At this stage the regioisomeric impurity
in 11 obtained by opening the cyclic sulfate was found to be
separable and the slightly lower yield of this step (86%) reflects
the removal of the undesired isomer.
It was now necessary to remove the PMB ether in 14.
Oxidative cleavage with CAN resulted in several products, thus
OPMB
OPMB
i
HO
11
AcO
Further studies are in progress to introduce into 18 the
24-membered polyene ring of viridenomycin.
TBDMSO
OBn
TBDMSO
OBn
Me
Me
We are grateful to the NIH for financial support of this
work.
12
13
iii
OH
OPMB
Notes and references
1 M. Nakagawa, K. Furihata, Y. Hayakawa and H. Seto, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1991, 32, 659.
iv
MeO
MeO
TBDMSO
OBn
2 T. Hasegawa, T. Kamiya, T. Henmi, H. Iwasaka and S. Yamatodani,
J. Antibiot., 1975, 28, 167.
TBDMSO
OBn
Me
Me
(+)-15
(+)-14
3 S. Omura, A. Nakagawa, K. Shibata and H. Sano, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1982 , 23, 4713; I. Umezawa, H. Takeshima, K. Komiyama, Y. Koh, H.
Yamamoto and M. Kawaguchi, J. Antibiot., 1981, 34, 259.
4 A. B. Smith, III, T. A. Rano, N. Chida, G. A. Sulikowski and J. L. Wood,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 8008.
v
O
5 A. I. Meyers and D. Romo, Tetrahedron, 1991, 47, 9503. A. I. Meyers
and G. P. Brengel, Chem. Commun., 1997, 1.
MeO
2
5
6 D. A. Sandham and A. I. Meyers, unpublished results.
7 A. Saito, A. Tanaka and T. Oritani, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1996, 7,
2923.
8 Y. Gao and K. B. Sharpless, J. Am Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 7538.
9 B. Lohray, Synthesis, 1992, 1035.
TBDMSO
OBn
Me
(+)-16
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: i, TBDMSCl, imidazole, DMAP
(91%); ii, K2CO3, MeOH (100%); iii, NaH (2.5 equiv.), MeI, 0 °C (86%);
iv, DDQ (1.3 equiv.), CH2Cl2–H2O (5+1) (93%); v, (COCl)2, DMSO, Et3N,
278 °C (91%).
10 C. Liotta and T. C. Caruso, Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26, 1599.
Communication 9/03160J
1372
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1371–1372