be expected. The former would be expected to be more
sensitive to electronic substitution on the aromatic ring as
there is more negative charge is on the nitrogen in 1b than
1a.
oxygen intramolecularly. Epoxide 13 is formed by an
intermolecular reaction. These experiments also demonstrate
that the oxaziridine of 3 is of similar reactivity to the
oxaziridine of 12. We therefore conclude that reaction of 3
through a transition state analogous to 1a is disfavored.7
These results do not exclude the possibility that reaction
pathways through transition states similar to 1a could also
be viable. To assess this transition-state geometry, oxaziridine
3 was investigated. At higher concentrations (0.1 M in
CDCl3), 3 was found to produce a small amount of 13 after
several days at 56 °C. Hydrolysis of the sulfonimine
apparently follows oxygen transfer. In addition, a large
number of unidentified decomposition products were formed.
At lower concentrations (0.005 M in CDCl3), 3 completely
decomposed over 7 days at 56 °C without producing a
detectable amount of 13. These observations imply that the
reaction of 3 to ultimately produce epoxide 13 intermolecular.
In summary, we have shown that the transition-state
structures for the reaction of N-sulfonyl oxaziridines with
olefins are best represented by Figure 1b and that reaction
via transition states analogous to 1a is not favorable.8
Transition state 1b may lead to hemiaminal intermediates
that have been observed spectroscopically for the reaction
of N-sulfonyl oxaziridines with organomagnesium reagents2a
and have been suggested as intermediates in other transfor-
mations.4,5 We suggest that anionic and neutral nucleophiles
react with N-sulfonyl oxaziridines through similar transition
states. The preferred trajectory for substitution at the oxygen
atom of the oxaziridine places the entering and leaving
groups in apical positions with respect to the transferred
oxygen. This transition state is similar to that of substitution
at the oxygen atom of a peroxide and is analogous to an
SN2 displacement at oxygen.9
Attempts to execute double-label experiments were ham-
pered by our inability both to obtain isotopic distribution
data for 13 and to derivitize 13 to a more suitable compound
for analysis without loss of the oxygen label.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a grant
from the National Science Foundation (98-19422).
To further explore the reactivity of 3, an intermolecular
reporter 14, was employed. Equimolar amounts of 3 and 14
were sealed in an NMR tube and allowed to react in CDCl3
at 56 °C. At higher concentrations (0.1 M total concentration
of alkene), both 13 and 15 were detected in the mixture after
hydrolysis along with a number of decomposition products.
At lower concentrations (0.01 M total concentration of
alkene), a trace amount of 15 was detected after 82 h. At
very low concentrations (0.005 M total concentration of
alkene), 3 completely decomposed after 7 days at 56 °C while
producing neither 13 nor 15. Reporter 14 was found to react
with 12 to produce 15 at higher concentrations (0.05 M with
respect to each species), but not at lower concentrations
(0.005 M with respect to each species).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental pro-
cedures for the preparation of all compounds and intermedi-
ates and sample kinetic data for 1. This material is available
OL990969W
(7) The observation that at 0.01 M a trace of epoxide 10 can be detected
is best understood in terms of competitive reaction pathways. As 2
decomposes, its relative concentration decreases and the velocity of the
epoxidation 9 increases relative to the epoxidation of 2 (or products derived
from 2). Alternatively, the reactivity of the alkene of 9 could be slightly
different than the reactivity of the alkene of 2 or products that result from
the reaction of 2.
(8) Our experiments do not distinguish between planar and spiro transition
states. Molecular models suggest that either transition state may be available
to 2 and 3.
(9) Woods, K. W.; Beak, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6281. Bach,
R. D.; Winter, J. D.; McDouall, J. J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
8586. Yamabe, S.; Kondou, C.; Minato, T. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 616.
Singleton, D. A.; Merrigan, S. R.; Liu, J.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 3385.
The fact that intermolecular epoxidation of 14 by 12 was
only observed at higher concentrations and that 3 only
produces epoxides from either itself or from 14 at the same
concentrations support the conclusion that 3 does not transfer
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 9, 1999
1417