5662
J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5662-5663
Sch em e 1. Syn th esis of a P h otola bile Am in o Acid
P h otolytic Ma ss La d d er in g for F a st
Ch a r a cter iza tion of Oligom er s on Sin gle
Resin Bea d s
Kevin Burgess,* Carlos I. Martinez,
David H. Russell, Hunwoo Shin, and Alex J . Zhang
Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University,
College Station, Texas 77843-3255
Received May 15, 1997
The divide/couple/recombine methodologies, also re-
ferred to as “split syntheses”, represent a powerful
combinatorial approach whereby a large number of
supported compounds can be prepared in comparatively
few synthetic operations. Originally, the technique was
demonstrated for peptides,1 and then coupled with a
combinatorial screen.2 Thus a library of approximately
2.47 × 106 different supported pentapeptides was mixed
with a monoclonal antibody (mAb), and those ligands
with highest affinities were identified via a marker on
the mAb. The methodology is not restricted to peptides,
however; split syntheses are conceptually applicable to
any supported oligomers or collections of compounds that
can be transformed via repetitive couplings.
Lead compound characterization is an obstacle that
must be overcome whenever split syntheses are applied
to generate libraries of oligomers that do not consist
solely of the protein amino acids. In such cases, auto-
mated peptide/protein sequencers using Edman’s degra-
dation3 chemistry are unsuitable. Mass spectrometric
methods like matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization
(MALDI)4 and electrospray ionization (ESI)5 give data
that can sometimes be used to characterize the product,
but time-consuming interpretations are required and
ambiguities can arise. Direct observation of the products
by NMR is impractical unless exceptionally large and
high-loading beads are used. Consequently, several
innovative solutions to the problem of characterizing
compounds on single resin beads have been reported.6-11
This communication describes our own method which is
one that may be described as a “photolytic mass-ladder-
ing technique”. The split synthesis is performed such
that most of the oligomer on any bead will consist of an
unperturbed sequence, but a small fraction will have a
photolabile group X inserted before each of the coupling
steps. On irradiation, an isolated bead generates frag-
ments of incrementally different molecular masses. MS
analyses of the material liberated could be used to deduce
the sequence from the molecular mass differences as
shown below.
Many of our original experiments to test the photolytic
mass-laddering concept were unsuccessful. Ultimately,
it became apparent that upon swelling most polystyrene-
containing beads (e.g. Rink and TentaGel resins) liberate
small polymer fragments of less than approximately 550
Da into solution, and that these obscured low concentra-
tions of any other materials liberated from the bead.
Above 550 Da, however, the spectra are relatively clean.
Consequently, it was necessary to prepare photocleavable
groups that would leave relatively heavy fragments (X*)
on the liberated strand, which would generate mass
ladders consisting of fragments larger than 550 Da.
Scheme 1 describes a synthesis of molecular fragment
X that could be used for photolytic mass laddering.
Quantitative alkylation of acetovanillone with methyl
5-bromopentanecarboxylate, followed by reduction with
sodium borohydride gave 1 in 97% yield after two steps
(1) Furka, A.; Sevestyen, F.; Asgedom, M.; Dibo, G. Int. J . Pept. Res.
1991, 37, 487-93.
(8) Ohlmeyer, M. H. J .; Swanson, R. N.; Dillard, L. W.; Reader, J .
C.; Asouline, G.; Kobayashi, R.; Wigler, M.; Still, W. C. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. 1993, 90, 10922-6.
(2) Lam, K. S.; Salmon, S. E.; Hersh, E. M.; Hruby, V. J .; Kazmier-
ski, W. M.; Knapp, R. J . Nature 1991, 354, 82.
(9) Geysen, H. M.; Wagner, C. D.; Bodnar, W. M.; Markworth, C.
J .; Parke, G. J .; Schoenen, F. J .; Wagner, D. S.; Kinder, D. S. Chem.
Biol. 1996, 3, 679-688.
(3) Edman, P.; Begg, G. Eur. J . Biochem. 1967, 1, 80-91.
(4) Karas, M.; Bachmann, D.; Bahr, U.; Hillenkamp, F. Int. J . Mass
Spectrom. Ion Processes 1987, 78, 53-68.
(10) Brummel, C. L.; Lee, I. N. W.; Zhou, Y.; Benkovic, S. J .;
Winograd, N. Science 1994, 264, 399-402.
(5) Fenn, J . B.; Mann, M.; Meng, C. K.; Wong, S. F.; Whitehouse,
C. M. Science 1989, 246, 64-71.
(11) Youngquist, R. S.; Fuentes, G. R.; Lacey, M. P.; Keough, T. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3900-6.
(6) Metzger, J . Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 723-5.
(7) Stevanovic, S.; Wiesmu¨ller, K.-H.; Metzger, J .; Beck-Sickinger,
A. G.; J ung, G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993, 3, 431-6.
(12) Thompson, A. S.; Humphrey, G. R.; DeMarco, A. M.; Mathre,
D. J .; Grabowski, E. J . J . J . Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5886-8.
S0022-3263(97)00866-9 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society