C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Spiro-Cyclopropanes from Oxoallylsilanes
The procedure herein described is quite general, providing an
efficient route for the design and construction of hydroxylated bi-,
tri-, and tetracyclic systems bearing the spiro-cyclopropyl group
(Table 2). High levels of diastereoselectivity were found in all
cyclizations studied with the exception of 3e,f which were isolated
as a mixture of epimeric alcohols in 3:1 ratio.
The stereochemistry observed might indicate a preference for
the transition state I, where bulky groups attain an equatorial
conformation which minimizes steric repulsions. The high stereo-
control with which the reaction proceeds allows the preparation of
enantiomerically pure compounds such as 3h, starting from a chiral
building block such as (+)-pulegone. It should be noted that the
â-phenyl-substituted oxoallylsilane 2k affords the fused cyclopro-
pane 3k instead of the former spiro compound, maintaining the
silyl group unchanged. This interesting result seems to point to the
intermediacy of a stabilized â-silyl cation 8 in which the loss of a
proton competes favorably with the leaving of silyl group, perhaps
due to the formation of highly stabilized tetrasubstituted alkene.
This observation might be useful in the future for directing the
reaction in either sense, on the basis of the type of substitution.
Acknowledgment. We thank the Ministry of Science and
Technology of Spain (Project BQU2003/03035) and the JCyL
(Project VA050/2004) for financial support.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
characterization data for all the new compounds. This material is
References
(1) (a) Auner, N.; Weis, J. Organosilicon Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
2003. (b) Fleming, I. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Fleming, I., Eds; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1991; Vol. 2. (c) Davies, A.
G. ComprehensiVe Organometallic Chemistry II; Pergamon: New York,
1995; Vol. 2.
(2) (a) Langkopf, E.; Schinzer, D. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 1375. (b) Fleming,
I.; Barbero, A.; Walter, D. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 2063.
(3) Fleming, I. Science of Synthesis: Houben-Weyl Methods of Molecular
Transformations; Thieme: Stuttgart, 2001; Vol. 4.
a Isolated pure compounds. b Reagent used: CH2I2/Et2Zn. c Epimeric ratio
3:1. d 3h: [R]D ) +12.4.
(4) Krause, N. Modern Organocopper Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Dortmund,
Germany, 2002; Chapter 3, pp 93-102.
(5) Barbero, A.; Pulido, F. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 817. For a recent
overview of the author’s work on metallocupration of multiple bonds,
see also: Barbero, A.; Pulido, F. J.; Rinco´n, J. A.; Cuadrado, P.; Galisteo,
D.; Mart´ınez-Garc´ıa, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2101; Barbero,
A.; Pulido, F. J.; Rinco´n, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12049;
Barbero, A.; Blanco, Y.; Ferna´ndez, H.; Pulido, F. J. Synlett, 2004, 2833.
(6) (a) Barbero, A.; Garc´ıa, C.; Pulido, F. J. Tetrahedron (Symposium-in-
Print) 2000, 56, 2739. (b) Barbero, A.; Castren˜o, P.; Garc´ıa, C.; Pulido,
F. J. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7723. (c) Barbero, A.; Pulido F. J. Synthesis
2004, 779.
because of the increasing importance of organometallic addition
to the carbonyl group (entries 3 and 4).
Formation of spiro-cyclopropanes 3a-j (Table 2) seems to
proceed by a two-step pathway, involving silicon-assisted cycliza-
tion of the starting oxoallylsilane, followed by cyclopropanation
of the resulting methylenecyclopentanol (eq 2). The first step
(cyclization) is induced by the presence of the organoaluminum
compound; the second one (cyclopropanation) takes place by
reaction with an in situ formed iodomethylaluminum intermediate
(eq 2). The actual catalyst in the first step may be either Me3Al or
the iodomethylaluminum species.
This unique tandem mechanism is probably the most remarkable
feature of the reaction, enabling the construction of spiro-bicyclic
systems from open-chain allylsilanes in one step, a process of
undoubted interest from a synthetic point of view. Moreover, the
significance of the overall process becomes obvious when one
realizes that each component of the reagent (Me3Al or CH2I2) leads
separately to results different from the general reaction (Table 1,
entries 8-9, compare 5 and 7).
(7) Barbero, A.; Castren˜o, P.; Pulido, F. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4045.
(8) Kunz, R. K.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3240
and references therein.
(9) Cyclopropanes and Related Rings; de Meijere, A., Ed; Chem. ReV. 2003,
103, Number 4, pp 931-1648.
(10) (a) Tokuzaki, K.; Kanemitu, Y.; Yoshimitsu, T.; Nagaoka, H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 5923. (b) Primke, H.; Sarin, G. S.; Kohlstruk, S.;
Adiwidjaja, G.; de Meijere, A. Chem. Ber. 1994, 127, 1051. (c) Friese, J.
C.; Scha¨fer, H. J. Synlett 2002, 814. (d) Hashimoto, H.; Jin, T.; Karikomi,
M.; Seki, K.; Haga, K.; Uyehara, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 3633.
(11) A modification of the original procedure due to Furukawa, see: Nishimura,
J.; Furukawa, J.; Kawabata, N.; Kitayama, M. Tetrahedron 1971, 27, 1799;
see also: Lorenz, J. C.; Long, J.; Yang, Z.; Xue, S.; Xie, Y.; Shi, Y. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 327.
(12) Maruoka, K.; Fukutani, Y.; Yamamoto, H. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 4414.
JA051967B
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 22, 2005 8023