metathesis reaction on the major dienes from the allylations by
the use of 5–10% Grubbs catalyst [RuCl2(CHPh){PCy3}2]13 in
CH2Cl2 (Table 2). These reactions also allow the ster-
eochemical outcome of the allylations to be determined. The
unprotected dienes in entries 1–4 all gave the desired cyclohex-
enes 7–10 in near quantitative yields. When the ammonium salt
of diene 6 (Scheme 1) was subjected to Grubbs catalyst,
significant decomposition took place and only a moderate yield
of the cyclohexene could be obtained. However, when 6 was N-
acetylated the ring-closing metathesis reaction went smoothly
to give 11 in very high yield (entry 5, Table 2).
In conclusion, we have developed a zinc-mediated elimina-
tion–alkylation of 5-iodopentofuranosides which permits ‘one-
pot’ formation of several bonds and a stereocenter in a
controlled manner. The obtained dienes and enynes are valuable
in carbohydrate annulation by transition metal catalysis, and we
have processed the dienes in the ring-closing metathesis
reaction. Hereby, a range of complex carbocyclic structures are
easily available as chiral building blocks from cheap sugar
starting materials by two consecutive organometallic trans-
formations.
Scheme 1
protected as triethylsilyl (TES) ethers 3–5. The reaction of these
in the presence of allyl/propargyl bromide proceeded smoothly
to give the dienes/enynes in good to excellent yields (entries
5–10). Unfortunately, the 2-deoxyribose substrate 5 gave a poor
diastereoselectivity in the alkylation. For the protected furano-
sides 1, 3 and 4, on the other hand, the selectivity for addition to
the intermediate aldehyde generally followed the Felkin–Anh
model.10
The intermediate aldehyde can potentially be intercepted
with an amine prior to the alkylation (Scheme 1). The alkylation
would then take place on the formed imine resulting in the
introduction of an amino group. In fact, treatment of 1 with zinc,
benzylamine and allyl bromide succeeded in giving the amino
diene product 6 in both good yield and diastereoselectivity. To
prevent significant allylation of the intermediate aldehyde, it
was important to add allyl bromide slowly during the course of
the reaction.
We thank the Danish Natural Science Research Council for
financial support.
Notes and references
1 L. F. Tietze, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 115; L. F. Tietze and U. Beifuss,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1993, 32, 131.
2 D. I. Dalko and P. Sinay¨, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 773; R. J.
Ferrier and S. Middleton, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 2779.
3 I. Ojima, M. Tzamarioudaki, Z. Li and R. J. Donovan, Chem. Rev., 1996,
96, 635.
4 For recent reviews, see: U. K. Pandit, H. S. Overkleeft, B. C. Borer and
H. Biera¨ugel, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1999, 959; D. L. Wright, Curr. Org.
Chem., 1999, 3, 211; A. Fu¨rstner, Top. Organomet. Chem., 1998, 1,
37.
Dienes and enynes are useful in transition metal-catalyzed
carbocyclizations.3 Hydroxylated enynes have previously been
used in palladium-catalyzed coupling of the A-ring in vitamin D
derivatives9,11 and in cobalt-mediated Pauson–Khand reac-
tions.12 Hydroxylated dienes are useful for carbocyclization by
ring-closing olefin metathesis. We have carried out the
Table 2 Ring-closing olefin metathesis of the major diene products from the
allylations
5 For recent applications of ring-closing olefin metathesis in carbohydrate
chemistry, see: P. Kapferer, F. Sarabia and A. Vasella, Helv. Chim.
Acta, 1999, 82, 645; H. Ovaa, J. D. C. Code´e, B. Lastdrager, H. S.
Overkleeft, G. A. van der Marel and J. H. van Boom, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1999, 40, 5063; A. Kornienko and M. d’Alarcao, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 1999, 10, 827; O. Sellier, P. Van de Weghe, D. Le Nouen,
C. Strehler and J. Eustache, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 853.
6 B. Bernet and A. Vasella, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1979, 62, 1990, 2400, 2411;
M. Nakane, C. R. Hutchinson and H. Gollman, Tetrahedron Lett., 1980,
21, 1213; A. Fu¨rstner, D. Jumbam, J. Teslic and H. Weidmann, J. Org.
Chem., 1991, 56, 2213.
Entry
Diene
Cyclohexene
Yield (%)
7 J.-L. Luche, L. A. Sarandeses, in Organozinc Reagents—A Practical
Approach, ed. P. Knochel and P. Jones, OUP, Oxford, 1999, p. 307.
8 L. M. Lerner, Carbohydr. Res., 1977, 53, 177.
9 R. M. Moriarty, J. Kim and H. Brumer III, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36,
51.
10 M. Che´rest, H. Felkin and N. Prudent, Tetrahedron Lett., 1968, 2199;
N. T. Anh, Top. Curr. Chem., 1980, 88, 145.
11 B. M. Trost, J. Dumas and M. Villa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 9836;
R. M. Moriarty and H. Brumer III, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 9265.
12 C. Mukai, J. S. Kim, M. Uchiyama and M. Hanaoka, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1998, 39, 7909.
13 P. Schwab, R. H. Grubbs and J. W. Ziller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
100.
14 Structure confirmed by acetylation to the known triacetate: J. Bange,
A. F. Haughan, J. R. Knight and J. Sweeney, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1, 1998, 1039.
15 T. Hudlicky, H. Luna, H. F. Olivo, C. Andersen, T. Nugent and J. D.
Price, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1991, 2907.
16 The structure of enantiomeric 9 and 10 was determined by OsO4
catalyzed dihydroxylation to the same symmetrical quercitol,
(1b,2b,3a,4b,5b)-pentahydroxycyclohexane: S. J. Angyal and L. Odier,
Carbohydr. Res., 1982, 100, 43.
17 Structure assigned after hydrogenation of the double bond and 1H NMR
analysis of the resulting cyclohexane.
a Ref, 14, b Ref. 15. c Ref. 16. d Ref. 17.
Communication 9/06953D
2102
Chem. Commun., 1999, 2101–2102