benzene/1,4-cyclohexadiene (1,4-CHD) mixture to 180 °C
in a steel bomb for 2 h.8 After slow cooling to room
temperature, GC/MS analysis of the crude reaction mixture
showed 2,3-dibromonaphthalene 3 to be the only significant
product, contaminated by a small amount of 2-bromo-
naphthalene. A single recrystallization of this crude product
from heptane provided pure 2,3-dibromonaphthalene in 70%
yield. The efficiency with which 2 undergoes cycloaroma-
tization is unusual for an acyclic enediyne and might be
explained by the electron-withdrawing effects of the halo-
gens. Electron-withdrawing substituents have been shown
to accelerate the rate of other cycloaromatization reactions.9
In an attempt to avoid performing these cycloaromatization
reactions under pressure, we investigated a number of other
reaction conditions which utilized less-volatile hydrogen
atom sources. Our best results were obtained using in-
expensive γ-terpinene (bp 182 °C), which has been reported
to be a higher-boiling replacement for 1,4-cyclohexadiene
in cycloaromatization reactions10salthough for our systems
it proved to be significantly less efficient than 1,4-CHD.
Thus, when dibromide 2 was added slowly to a refluxing
(180 °C) solution of 1,2-dichlorobenzene/γ-terpinene (10:1
v/v) and allowed to react at that temperature overnight, we
were able to separate a 35% yield of dibromonaphthalene 3
from the significant amount of oligomerization and addition
products formed from this reaction.11 Increasing the propor-
tion of γ-terpinene did not improve the yield of the desired
product, and in fact when γ-terpinene was used as the
reaction solvent, the yield of dibromonaphthalene was
reduced dramatically. However, the ability to perform the
cycloaromatization in simple refluxing solvents, rather than
in a sealed pressure apparatus, is a significant advantage for
larger-scale reactions.
Scheme 1
A single attempt at performing a third iteration was
plagued with problems caused by the insolubility of the
intermediates (Scheme 2). The dibromide prepared by
Scheme 2
The alkynylation of 2,3-dibromonaphthalene was best
performed by palladium-catalyzed coupling with (trimeth-
ylsilylethynyl)zinc chloride in refluxing ether, which pro-
ceeded in significantly higher yield than any attempted
Sonagashira-type couplings.12 The overall yield for the first
full iteration (1 to 4) was 57%.
The second iteration was performed in a similar manner:
Desilylative bromination to form 2,3-bis(bromoethynyl)-
naphthalene and cycloaromatization at 180 °C followed by
alkynylation to give the desired bis(trimethylsilylethynyl)-
anthracene 5 in a 68% overall yield from 4 (Scheme 1). In
this case, we did not purify the intermediate dibromo-
anthracene before performing the acetylenic coupling, since
the very soluble 5 was significantly easier to separate from
the reaction byproducts.
desilylative halogenation of 5 was only sparingly soluble in
hot benzene, and the cycloaromatization of this material
produced a significant amount of black char. The palladium-
catalyzed coupling of (trimethylsilylethynyl)zinc chloride to
this crude material led to the recovery of approximately 20%
by mass of soluble material, which was a chromatographi-
cally inseparable mixture of products shown by GC/MS
analysis to include the desired diethynyl compound, the
monoethynyl compound, and several dehalogenated products.
It is obvious that the success of this iterative scheme depends
on the solubility of the intermediate dibromoenediyne.
The iterative process can be terminated in a number of
ways. For example, the dibromoarenes formed by cycloaro-
matization can be substituted with alkyl, aryl, or alkynyl
functional groups by well-known coupling chemistry.13 More
simply, the iterative process can be ended by the cyclo-
aromatization of the unsubstituted enediyne to yield the
(8) Lower temperature cycloaromatization runs were attempted, but led
to slow decomposition of starting material. All of the high-temperature
reactions performed in sealed systems were carried out behind protective
shielding.
(9) (a) Semmelhack, M. F.; Neu, T.; Foubelo, F. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 5038. (b) Maier, M. E.; Greiner, B. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1992, 855. (c)
Schmittel, M.; Kiau, S. Chem. Lett. 1995, 953.
(10) Grissom, J. W.; Calkins, T. L.; Egan, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 11744.
(11) Addition of p-benzyne diradical to the hydrogen atom source is a
common byproduct of cycloaromatization reactions. See, e.g., ref 8a.
(12) (a) Negishi, E.; Kotora, M.; Xu, C. D. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
8957. (b) John, J. A.; Tour, J. M. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 15515.
86
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 1, 2000