J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3033-3036
3033
The 2-Vinylphosphirane-3-Phospholene Rearrangement: Biradicaloid
and Concerted Features
Maurice J. van Eis, Tom Nijbacker, Franciscus J. J. de Kanter, Willem H. de Wolf,
Koop Lammertsma,* and Friedrich Bickelhaupt*
Contribution from the Scheikundig Laboratorium, Vrije UniVersiteit, De Boelelaan 1083,
NL-1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
ReceiVed October 27, 1999
Abstract: Activation parameters have been determined for the 2-vinylphosphirane-3-phospholene rearrangement
in the cycloheptane annellated series 7 f 8. For the thermal reaction, the mean activation parameters (∆Hq )
125 ( 5 kJ mol-1 and ∆Sq ) -1 ( 14 J K-1 mol-1) are as expected for a biradicaloid character of the
transition structure. In the presence of Cu(I) as a catalyst, the activation parameters for this conversion (∆Hq
) 80.2 ( 3 kJ mol-1 and ∆Sq ) -100 ( 7 J K-1 mol-1) are strikingly different and more in line with a
concerted pathway.
Introduction
Scheme 1a
Since its discovery nearly 4 decades ago,1 the structural
rearrangement of vinylcyclopropane (1a) to cyclopentene (2a)
has been subject to controversy.2 Two limiting pathways have
been proposed: (a) a rearrangement involving a biradical
intermediate 3a and (b) a concerted [1,3] sigmatropic shift
(Scheme 1).
Interestingly, the reaction shows characteristics of both. There
is ample evidence for the involvement of a biradical.3 However,
the rearrangement of, e.g., a tert-butyl substituted vinylcyclo-
propane proceeds with high stereospecificity under inversion
at the migrating carbon in support of a Woodward-Hoffmann
allowed suprafacial [1,3] sigmatropic shift.4 Recent studies5
suggest that these seemingly contradictory results may be
reconciled by recognizing that the transition state structure lies
on a rather flat plateau and has considerable biradical character,
with dynamic effects playing a decisive role in the stereochem-
ical course of the reaction.
a a: X ) CH2. b: X ) RP. c: X ) PhPW(CO)5.
occurs via a biradical intermediate.6 Mathey et al.7 reported the
addition of terminal phosphinidene complex PhPW(CO)5 (4)
to 1,3-butadiene to give a 2-vinylphosphirane complex of type
1c, which rearranges to the corresponding 3-phospholene (2c),
but stereochemical details were not provided. Lammertsma et
al.8 studied the addition of 4 to cyclic dienes and reported a
vinylphosphirane-phospholene rearrangement with inversion
at the phosphorus center but provided no kinetic data. Recently,
we observed the formation of phospholenes both by a direct
1,4-addition of 4 to cisoid 1,3-dienes and by a stepwise process
via the corresponding 1,2-adducts.9 In the present study we
report on the kinetics of this latter conversion, i.e., the
rearrangement of a vinylphosphirane to the (formal) 1,4-adduct,
a phospholene.
Surprisingly, the related vinylphosphirane-phospholene rear-
rangement has received little attention. On the basis of an
exploratory kinetic study, Richter proposed that the thermal
rearrangement of 1-tert-butyl-2-vinylphosphirane (1b, R ) t-Bu)
Results and Discussion
(1) (a) Neureiter, N. P. J. Org. Chem. 1959, 24, 2044. (b) Vogel, E.
Angew. Chem. 1960, 72, 4, ref 162. (c) Overberger, C. G.; Borchert, A. E.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 1007, 4896.
Reaction of 1,2-dimethylenecycloheptane (6) with 4, gener-
ated by the CuCl-catalyzed cheletropic elimination from 5 at
50 °C in xylene, affords a mixture of 1,2-adducts 7a and 7b
and 1,4-adduct 8 in 53, 28, and 19% yield, respectively (Scheme
2).9 Heating to 100 °C converts both vinylphosphiranes 7a,b to
phospholene 8; the latter was characterized by an X-ray crystal
structure determination.9 The 1,2-adducts 7a,b could not be
isolated separately, but were identified in the mixture by 31P
NMR spectroscopy.
(2) (a) For a review of the extensive early literature see: Gajewski, J. J.
Hydrocarbon Thermal Isomerizations; Academic Press: New York, 1980;
pp 81-87. (b) For a recent review see: Baldwin, J. E. J. Comput. Chem.
1998, 19, 222.
(3) For a viewpoint in favor of diradicals see: (a) Baldwin, J. E.;
Bonacorsi, S. J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10845. (b) Baldwin, J.
E.; Bonacorsi, S. J., Jr. J. A. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8258.
(4) For experiments in favor of a concerted mechanism see: (a) Gajewski,
J. J.; Olson, L. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7432. (b) Gajewski, J. J.;
Olson, L. P.; Willcott, M. R., III J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 299.
(5) (a) Davidson, E. R.; Gajewski, J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
10543. (b) Houk, K. N.; Nendel, M.; Wiest, O.; Storer, J. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 10545. (c) Sperling, D.; Fabian, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
1, 215. (d) Doubleday, C.; Nendel, M.; Houk, K. N.; Thweatt, D.; Page,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4720. (e) Baldwin, J. E.; Bonacorsi, S. J.,
Jr.; Burell, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 4721. (f) Baldwin, J. E.; Burell,
R. C. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 3567. (g) Baldwin, J. E.; Shukla, R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11018.
(6) (a) Richter, J. W. Chem. Ber. 1983, 116, 3293. (b) Richter, J. W.
Chem. Ber. 1985, 118, 97. (c) Richter, J. W. Chem. Ber. 1985, 118, 1575.
(7) Marinetti, A.; Mathey, F. Organometallics 1982, 3, 456.
(8) Lammertsma, K.; Hung, J.; Chand, P.; Gray, G. M. J. Org. Chem.
1992, 57, 6557.
(9) van Eis, M. J.; de Kanter, F. J. J.; de Wolf, W. H.; Lammertsma, K.;
Bickelhaupt, F. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 129.
10.1021/ja993829q CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/21/2000