Synthesis of the Glycidaldehyde-dC Adduct
Chem. Res. Toxicol., Vol. 13, No. 3, 2000 209
Sch em e 1. Syn th esis of 8-(Hyd r oxym eth yl)-3,N4-eth en o-2′-d eoxycytid in e
nol, dichloromethane, acetone, benzene, and acetonitrile were
from J . T. Baker (Philipsburg, NJ ). Potassium carbonate,
phosphorus pentoxide, and thin-layer chromatography silica
plates were purchased from EM Science (Gibbston, NJ ), and
calcium hydride was from Fluka Chemika (Ronkonkoma, NY).
Bacterial alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and snake venom phos-
phodiesterase (SVP) were from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. (Alame-
da, CA). The PAC phosphoramidites were purchased from
Pharmacia (Piscataway, NJ ). All solvents were dried by distil-
lation over calcium hydride.
(2) An a lysis a n d P u r ifica tion . Proton (400 MHz) NMR
spectra were recorded with DMSO-d6 as the solvent, and D2O
exchanges were carried out to assign exchangeable protons,
unless otherwise indicated. NMR spectra were recorded using
a Bruker AM400 spectrometer and are reported in parts per
million (ppm) relative to an internal standard of tetramethyl-
silane. 31P NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AM400
spectrometer, and the chemical shifts are reported relative to
an external standard of phosphoric acid. Fast atom bombard-
ment (FAB) spectra were obtained on a VG70 SE Instruments
mass spectrometer, and glycerin or thioglycerin was used as a
matrix. Electrospray mass spectra were obtained on a VG Bio-Q
Instruments mass spectrometer. Ultraviolet spectra were re-
corded on a Hitachi U-2000 spectrophotometer using 0.5 cm
cuvettes. TLC was performed on EM 5735/7 silica gel 60 F254
plates. Column chromatography was performed using silica gel
60 with elution under gravity.
other products were present, including 3,N4-etheno-dC). The
solvent was removed in vacuo to afford a yellow gum. The
desired product (1) was isolated using silica gel column chro-
matography eluting with 40% acetone and 60% dichloromethane.
A mixture of more polar byproducts which included 3,N4-etheno-
dC was also eluted from the column. The product was dried to
afford a yellow gum with a 28% yield (0.321 g). UV (water): λmax
272, 283, 326 nm. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 10.53 [1H, s, C(O)H],
8.14 (1H, s, H-7), 8.02 (1H, d, J ) 8 Hz, H-6), 6.89 (1H, d, J )
8 Hz, H-5), 6.39 (1H, t, J ) 6 Hz, H-1′), 5.33 (1H, d, J ) 4 Hz,
3′-OH), 5.15 (1H, t, J ) 6 Hz, 5′-OH), 4.29-4.27 (1H, m, H-4′),
3.89-3.86 (1H, m, H-3′), 3.70-3.60 (2H, m, 2 × H-5′), 2.32-
2.18 (2H, m, 2 × H-2′). FAB-MS (rel intensity): m/z 280 (41%,
MH+), 164 (100%, base H+)
(B) P r ep a r a tion of 8-(Hyd r oxym eth yl)-3,N4-eth en o-2′-
d eoxycytid in e (2). Sodium borohydride (0.004 g, 0.10 mmol,
2.0 equiv) was added to a solution of 3,N4-ethenocarbaldehyde-
2′-deoxycytidine (0.014 g, 0.05 mmol) in ethanol (4 mL) at 0 °C.
The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature,
then stirred for 2 h, and then diluted with 10 volumes of
dichloromethane. The solution was washed with saturated
sodium chloride and water, dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and con-
centrated in vacuo to afford a white foam. The desired product
(2) was isolated using silica gel column chromatography eluting
with 4% methanol and 96% dichloromethane. The resulting
yellow solid was obtained in 84% yield (0.012 g). UV (water):
λmax 278 (pH 7, ꢀmax ) 7700 mol-1 cm2, ꢀ260 ) 4900 mol-1 cm2),
1
278 (pH 14), 296 nm (pH 1). H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 7.75 (1H,
(3) HP LC. Analytical and semipreparative HPLC were
conducted using a Hewlett-Packard 1050 photodiode array
detector and quarternary gradient pump (solvent delivery
system). Solvent systems included solvent A (acetonitrile),
solvent B [0.1 M triethylammonium acetate (pH 7)], and solvent
C [0.01 M potassium phosphate (pH 4.5)]. In system 1, oligo-
nucleotides were purified using a C18 column (300 mm × 3.9
mm, 5 µm, Hamilton PRP-1). The initial concentrations of 15%
solvent A and 85% solvent B were maintained for 5 min, and
then the concentration of solvent A was increased linearly to
35% over the course of 20 min at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. In
system 2, oligonucleotides were analyzed using a C18 column
(300 mm × 3.9 mm, 5 µm, Hamilton PRP-1). The initial
concentrations of 5% solvent A and 95% solvent B were
maintained for 5 min, and then the concentration of solvent A
was increased linearly to 35% over the course of 40 min at a
flow rate of 1 mL/min. In system 3, analysis of the enzyme digest
of the oligonucleotides was performed with a Supelcosil LC-18-
DB column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Supelco Inc.) and 0%
solvent A and 100% solvent C. The concentration of solvent A
was linearly increased from 0 to 10% over the course of 25 min
at a flow rate of 1 mL/min.
Ch em ica l Syn th eses. (1) Syn th esis of th e d C-Glycid -
a ld eh yd e Ad d u ct (Sch em e 1). (A) P r ep a r a tion of 3,N4-
Eth en oca r ba ld eh yd e-2′-d eoxycytid in e (1). Bromomalonal-
dehyde (0.622 g, 4.07 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was added to a solution
of 2′-deoxycytidine (1.00 g, 4.07 mmol) in water (100 mL). The
pH of the reaction mixture was then adjusted to 4.5 with a 2 M
sodium hydroxide solution. The reaction mixture was stirred
at 60 °C for 30 h. Further bromomalonaldehyde (0.200 g, 1.30
mmol, 0.3 equiv) was added after this time. The reaction mixture
was stirred at 60 °C for an additional 18 h (TLC analysis
indicated that the dC had been completely consumed and that
d, J ) 8 Hz, H-6), 6.82 (1H, s, H-7), 6.53 (1H, t, J ) 6 Hz, H-1′),
6.28 (1H, d, J ) 8 Hz, H-5), 5.53-5.51 (2H, m, CH2), 4.23-4.09
(2H, m, H-4′, H-3′), 3.55-3.42 (2H, m, 2 × H-5′), 2.19-2.08 (2H,
m, 2 × H-2′). FAB-MS (rel intensity): m/z 282 (50%, MH+), 166
(23%, base H+), 135 (100%, base H+ - Ome).
(2) Syn th esis of th e P r otected P h osp h or a m id ite De-
r iva tive of th e d C-Glycid a ld eh yd e Ad d u ct (Sch em e 2).
(A) P r ep a r a tion of 5′-O-(4,4′-Dim eth oxytr ityl)-3,N4-eth en o-
car baldeh yde-2′-deoxycytidin e (3). 4,4′-Dimethoxytrityl chlo-
ride (0.530 g, 1.56 mmol, 1.5 equiv) was added to a solution of
3,N4-ethenocarbaldehyde-2′-deoxycytidine (0.291 g, 1.04 mmol)
in dry pyridine (20 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature for 16 h. Further 4,4-dimethoxytrityl chloride
(0.352 g, 1.04 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was added, and then the reaction
mixture was stirred for an additional 4 h. The solvent was
removed in vacuo, and the residue was dissolved in dichlo-
romethane. The solution was washed with 5% sodium hydrogen
carbonate solution and with saturated sodium chloride solution,
dried (Na2SO4), and filtered. The solvent was removed by
forming the azeotrope with toluene in vacuo to afford a yellow
gum. The desired product (3) was isolated using silica gel column
chromatography eluting with 2% methanol and 98% dichlo-
romethane. The resulting yellow foam was obtained in 69% yield
(0.418 g). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 10.67 [1H, s, C(O)H], 8.17 (1H, s,
H-7), 7.91 (1H, d, J ) 8 Hz, H-6), 7.39-6.76 (13H, m, DMTr),
6.55 (1H, t, J ) 6 Hz, H-1′), 6.38 (1H, d, J ) 8 Hz, H-5), 4.64-
4.62 (1H, m, H-4′), 4.10-4.07 (1H, m, H-3′), 3.56-3.49 (2H, m,
2 × H-5′), 2.58-2.55 (1H, m, H-2′), 2.39-2.36 (1H, m, H-2′).
FAB-MS (rel intensity): m/z 582 (68%, MH+), 303 (100%,
DMTH+), 164 (8%, base H+).
(B) P r ep a r a t ion of 5′-O-(4,4′-Dim et h oxyt r it yl)-8-(h y-
dr oxym eth yl)-3,N4-eth en o-2′-deoxycytidin e (4). Sodium boro-