TABLE 1. 1H NMR Spectral Characteristics of Compounds 1-9
Com-
pound
Chemical shifts (CDCl3), δ, ppm (J, Hz)
1
2
3
4
14.4 (1H, s, NH); 7.9-8.1 (2H, m, C6H5); 7.4-7.6 (3H, m, C6H5); 5.97 (1H, m, –CH=);
5.27 (1H, dt, 3Jcis = 15.7, =CHH); 5.09 (1H, dt, 3Jtrans = 9.9, =CHH);
3.82 (2H, dt, 4J = 1.3, CH2CH)
7.5-7.7 (5H, m, C6H5); 4.92 (1Н, m, –CHI–);
4.55* (1Н, q, 3JMX = 3.7, 2JMN = –13.0, –NCHHM–); 4.45* (1Н, q, 3JNX = 8.3, –NCHNH–);
3.61* (1H, q, 3JAX = 2.2, 2JAB = –12.9, –SCHHAI); 3.59* (1Н, q, 3JBX = 9.6, –SCHHBI)
7.65-7.80 (2H, m, C6H5); 7.4-7.5 (3H, m, C6H5); 4.99 (1Н, m, –NCH–); 4.38 (1Н, q,
4JMB = 1.3, 3JMX = 7.3, 2JMN = -11.9, –SCHHM–); 3.82 (1Н, q, 3JNX = 1.9, –SCHNH–);
3.36 (1H, q, 3JAX = 10.5, 2JAB = -10.5, –CHHAI); 3.11 (1Н, d, 3JBX = 3.0, –CHHBI)
7.95-8.05 (2H, m, C6H5); 7.35-7.55 (3H, m, C6H5); 4.74* (1Н, m, –CHI–);
4.81* (1Н, dd, 4JMB = 1.6, 3JMX = 5.0, 2JMN = –13.8, –NCHHM–);
4.54 (1Н, sext., 3JNX = 9.5, –NCHNH–);
3.67* (1H, dd, 3JAX = 10.6, 2JAB = -12.6, –SCHHAI); 3.55* (1Н, d, 3JBX = 3.3, –SCHHBI)
5
8.0–8.1 (2H, m, C6H5); 7.4-7.5 (3H, m, C6H5); 4.55 (1Н, m, –NCH–);
4.16 (1Н, q, 3JMX = 8.1, 2JMN = -11.9, –SCHHM–); 3.84 (1Н, q, 3JNX = 5.4, –SCHNH–);
3.70 (1H, q, 3JAX = 3.0, 2JAB = -10.6, –CHHAI); 3.51 (1Н, q, 3JBX = 9.1, –CHHBI)
6
7
7.4-7.7 (5H, m, C6H5); 6.55 (1Н, q, 4J = 1.3, H-6); 2.12 (3H, d, CH3)
8.1-8.2 (2H, m, C6H5); 7.4-7.6 (3H, m, C6H5); 6.59 (1Н, q, 4J = 1.2, H-5);
2.58 (3H, d, CH3)
8a*2
8b*2
9a*2
9b*2
7.5-7.7 (5H, m, C6H5); 6.41 (1Н, dt, 3J = 10.0, 4J = 1.7, –SCH=); 5.96 (1Н, dt, –CH=);
4.79 (2Н, dd, 3J = 3.7, –NCH2–)
7.5-7.7 (5H, m, C6H5); 6.89 (1Н, dt, 3J = 8.0, 4J = 1.4, –NCH=); 5.76 (1Н, dt, –CH=);
3.61 (2Н, dt, 3J = 5.4, –SCH2–)
7.4-8.0 (5H, m, C6H5); 6.31 (1Н, dt, 3J = 10.0, 4J = 1.9, –SCH=); 5.99 (1Н, dt, –CH=);
5.04 (2Н, dd, 3J = 3.4, –NCH2–)
7.4-8.0 (5H, m, C6H5); 7.10 (1Н, dt, 3J = 8.5, 4J = 1.5, –NCH=); 5.51 (1Н, dt, –CH=);
3.72 (2Н, dt, 3J = 5.3, –SCH2–)
_______
* As part of a multiplet.
*2 As a mixture of isomers.
The spin-spin coupling constant values are in good agreement with relative stability of conformers for all
of the cyclization products 2-5 as determined by a full energy semiempirical PM3 calculation (Table 2). Thus,
according to the calculations, the conformers with pseudoequatorial iodine atom have a greater stability in the
six-membered products 2 and 4 and in thiazoles 3 and 5 the conformer 10a is more stable in which the iodine
atom is placed out of the plane of the thiazole ring. The calculation also showed that, for thiazole 3, the
conformation 10b does not overall exist in a potential energy minimum, probably due to the unfavorable steric
interaction of the iodine atom with the phenyl group.
TABLE 2. Relative Energy (E) of the Conformers of the Cyclization
Products 2-5*
E, kJ/mol
Conformer
2
3
4
5
10a
10b
10c
—
—
—
31.1
Unstable
53.7
—
—
—
36.3
58.4
56.7
—
Axial iodine atom
Equatorial iodine atom
21.0
0.0
—
23.7
0.1
—
—
_______
* The energy of the most stable conformer was used as the zero energy value.
1209