3600
X. Su et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 14 (2003) 3593–3600
After adding 90 mL methanol, the organic layer was
subjected to hydrogenation for 6 h at 100 psi/55°C
using 10% Pd–C (0.75 mol%, 50% wet Degussa type)
catalyst. The reaction mixture was filtered through
celite to remove the catalyst. A solution of 38 g (0.95
mol) of NaOH in 300 mL of water was added to the
MTBE solution and MTBE distilled. 300 mL of
methanol was added to the resulting slurry and the
heterogeneous reaction heated to reflux for approxi-
mately 6 h. After distillation of volatiles, the reaction
was washed with heptane (600 mL). Methanol (240
mL) and water (960 mL) were added and the reaction
mixture was cooled to 12°C, and 240 mL of 6 M HCl
was added while maintaining the temperature below
20°C. The resulting slurry was stirred at room tempera-
ture for 1 h. The slurry was then filtered and the cake
was washed with water (2×300 mL), heptane (2×300
mL), and dried to yield (S)-CHPGA as white solid (104
g, 94.2% yield, >99.9% enantiomeric excess). The ee was
determined by HPLC (Chiralpak AS, mobile phase
95% hexane/5% IPA/0.1% TFA). (S)-1 elutes at
approximately 9.24 min. (R)-1 elutes at approximately
Optically Active Cyclohexylphenyl Glycolate Esters’; (c)
Bakale, R. P.; Lopez, J. L.; McConville, F. X.; Vanden-
bossche, C. P.; Senanayake, C. H. US Patent 6,140,529,
Oct. 31, 2000, ‘Synthesis Of Optically Active Cyclo-
hexylphenyl Glycolate Esters’; (d) Masumoto, S.; Suzuki,
M.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
8647; (e) Gupta, P.; Fernandes, R. A.; Kumar, P. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2003, 44, 4231.
4. (a) Senanayake, C. H.; Fang, K.; Grover, P. T.; Bakale,
R. P.; Vandenbossche, C. P.; Wald, S. A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1999, 40, 819; (b) Grover, P. T.; Bhongle, N. N.;
Wald, S. A.; Senanayake, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
6283 and references cited therein.
5. (a) Seebach, D.; Naef, R.; Calderari, G. Tetrahedron
1984, 40, 1313; (b) Seebach, D.; Sting, A. R.; Hoffmann,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2708; (c)
Seebach, D.; Naef, R. Helv. Chim. Acta 1981, 64, 2704;
(d) Seebach, D.; Renaud, P. Helv. Chim. Acta 1985, 68,
2342; (e) Seebach, D.; Muller, S.; Gysel, U.; Zimmer-
mann, J. Helv. Chim. Acta 1985, 68, 2342.
6. Although both hexane and heptane are classified as
flammability 1 solvents (composition of flammable mix-
ture is 1–7 wt% in air), heptane is generally considered to
be a better solvent for scale-up because hexane has a
higher tendency to build up static charge (conductivity @
23°C: heptane 200 pS/m; hexane 10 pS/m). See:
McConville. F.X. The Pilot Plant Real Book: A Unique
Handbook for the Chemical Process Industry; FXM Engi-
neering and Design, 2002; Chapter 6.
1
6.36 min. H NMR (CDCl3) l 1.01–1.76 (m, 10H), 2.17
(m, 1H), 5.20 (bs, 1H), 7.23 (t, J=7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (t,
J=7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J=7.7 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR l
25.57, 26.27, 26.42, 27.52, 81.15, 126.10, 127.85, 128.24,
140.03, 180.97. MS (m/e) 234 (M+). Anal. calcd for
C14H18O3: C, 71.77; H, 7.74. Found: C, 71.86; H, 7.77.
7. Mase, T.; Houpis, I. N.; Akao, A.; Dorzoitis, I.; Emer-
son, K.; Hoang, T.; Iida, T.; Itoh, T.; Kamei, K.; Kato,
S.; Kato, Y.; Kawasaki, M.; Lang, F.; Lee, J.; Lynch, J.;
Maligres, P.; Molina, A.; Nemoto, T.; Okada, S.;
Reamer, R.; Song, J. Z.; Tschaen, D.; Wada, T.; Zewge,
D.; Volante, R. P.; Reider, P. J.; Tomimoto, K. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 6775.
8. (a) Chapel, N.; Greiner, A.; Ortholand, J. S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1991, 32, 1441; (b) Frater, G.; Moller, U.; Gonther,
W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 4221.
Acknowledgements
Mr. Robert Prytko is acknowledged for his help in the
scale-up of the process in the kilolab and Mr Hui Li for
analytical support. The authors acknowledge Dr. Paul
T. Grover for helpful discussions during the develop-
ment of this process and Dr. Seth Ribe for helpful
suggestions while preparing this manuscript.
9. (a) Salomaa, P.; Sallinen, K. Acta Chem. Scand. 1965, 19,
1054; (b) Farines, M.; Soulier, J. Bull. Soc. Chem. Fr.
1970, 332.
10. (a) Yee, N. K. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2781; (b) Kosˇmrlj, J.;
Weigel, L. O.; Evans, D. A.; Downey, C. W.; Wu, J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3208.
References
1. (a) Wein, A. J. Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2001, 10, 65; (b)
Owens, R. G.; Karram, M. M. Drug Safety 1998, 123.
2. Yarker, Y. E.; Goa, K. L.; Fitton, A. Drug Aging 1995,
6, 243.
11. The solubility curve of dioxolone 3 in hexanes is expected
to be similar to that obtained in heptane.
12. HPLC conditions: column: Regis Whelk-O-1(R,R), 5
mm×25 cm×4.6 mm; mobile phase: hexanes/IPA 97/3,
ambient temperature at 1 mL/min; UV detection at 210
nm. Retention times: (2R,5S)-4, 5.95 min; (2S,5R)-4, 8.47
min; of (2S,5S)-3, 9.10 min; of (2R,5R)-3, 12.51 min.
13. Hazard analyses were completed to determine the reac-
tion profile and better define the scale-up conditions.
3. (a) Bakale, R. P.; Lopez, J. L.; McConville, F. X.;
Vandenbossche, C. P.; Senanayake, C. H. US Patent
6,090,971, July 18, 2000, ‘Resolution Process For Cyclo-
hexylphenyl Glycolic Acid’; (b) Bakale, R. P.; Lopez, J.
L.; McConville, F. X.; Vandenbossche, C. P.;
Senanayake, C. H. US Patent 5,973,182, Oct. 26, 1999,
‘Carbonate Intermediates Useful In The Preparation Of