Scheme 1
Scheme 2
both of these examples, the diastereomeric ratios of allylated
diols (7:1 and 10:1, respectively)4b,11 were significantly more
elevated than in the case of 2. An increased bias for formation
of the anti diols was deduced by analysis of the relevant
chemical shifts exhibited by 9a and 9b.12,13 This phenomenon
may be indicative of a significantly greater preference for
adoption of chelated transition states.14 Although 10a, 12a,15
and 12b16 were obtained with ease, 10b could not be
characterized because of its marked sensitivity to polymer-
ization.
A pair of cyclic substrates has been studied in detail. The
2-fold allylindation of 1,2-cyclohexanedione under the pre-
described aqueous conditions proceeded rapidly at the 0.08
M level to furnish 13 in 92% yield (Scheme 3). Exposure of
13 to the Grubbs catalyst in CH2Cl2 provided bicyclic diol
1417 as a 3:1 mixture of diastereomers. Sequential catalytic
hydrogenation afforded 1518 from which 1,6-cyclodecanedi-
one (16)19 was derived. Once again, the introduction of lead
tetraacetate immediately after completion of the ring-closing
metathesis was found to be optimal in providing 17 and 18
as a 3:2 mixture in 69% overall yield. In 17 where no double
bond migration occurs, the olefinic linkage must necessarily
be cis. When conjugation does materialize as in 18, the
favored double bond geometry is trans (J2,3 ) 11.9 Hz).
Implementation of the allylindation of 1920 was met with
exclusive monoaddition. The second 1,2-addition occurred
uneventfully when recourse was made to the allyl Grignard
reagent in anhydrous ether. These conditions gave rise in
83% yield to a single diasteriomer of 20 (Scheme 4).
Activation of the terminal vinyl groups in this diol with the
Grubbs catalyst elaborated 21 in essentially quantitative yield.
From this point, it proved an easy matter to generate pure
2221 or a mixture of 23 and 24, which could be readily
separated by chromatography.
(10) Barbot, F.; Aidene, M.; Miginiac, L. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28,
3279.
(11) Kobayashi, S.; Hachiya, I. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 6958.
(12) The methyl protons of 9a (δ 1.05) experience significant shielding
as a consequence of their position relative to the phenyl ring.
(13) (a) Diol 11a is known: Fujiwara, T.; Tsuruta, Y.; Arizono, K.;
Takeda T. Synlett 1997, 962. (b) For 11b, see: Berti, G.; Bottari, F.;
Macchia, B.; Macchia, F. Tetrahedron 1965, 21, 3277. (c) Delgado, A.;
Granados, R.; Mauleon, D.; Soucheiron, I.; Feliz, M. Can. J. Chem. 1985,
63, 3186.
(14) Paquette, L. A.; Mitzel, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1931.
(15) Nishinaga, A.; Rindo, K.; Matsuura, T. Synthesis 1986, 1038.
(16) (a) Yamaguchi, M.; Takada, T.; Endo, T. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
1490. (b) Kabalka, G. W.; Yu, S.; Li, N.-S. Can. J. Chem. 1998, 76, 800.
(17) The trans isomer of 14 has been reported: Hueckel, W. Chem. Ber.
1956, 89, 2098, 2102.
(18) (a) Dev, S. J. Ind. Chem. Soc. 1954, 1, 5. (b) Betzemeier, B.;
Lhermite, F.; Knochel, P. Synlett 1999, 489.
(19) House, H. O.; Lee, J. H. C.; Van Deveer, D.; Wassinger, J. E. J.
Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 5285.
(20) Kawada K.; Gross, R. S.; Watt, D. S. Synth. Commun. 1989, 19,
777.
(21) Leriverend, P.; Conia, J.-M. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1970, 1040.
1264
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 9, 2000