diastereoselective nucleophilic substitutions of R-iodo- and
R-bromoesters and amides8 and to the hydrogenation of
R-chloro-â-ketoesters by Ru(II)-diphosphine catalysts.9
Even considering the sensibility of R-halo ketones toward
substitutions and/or eliminations, a global analysis of the
above information suggests that hydrogenation of haloketones
via DKR under appropriate conditions should provide a
valuable tool for the synthesis of the title compounds
(Scheme 1).
Scheme 2. Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of R-Halo
Indanones and Tetralones
Scheme 1. Transfer Hydrogenation of R-Halo Ketones via
DKR; A Synthetic Route to Halohydrins
catalyst. Under these conditions (B), the desired reduction
takes place smoothly to afford cis-2-bromo-1-indanol 6 in
84% yield and with excellent ee >99% (Table 1, entry 1).
The chlorinated analogue 2 resisted even conditions A,12
leading to the desired product 7 in 88% yield, again with
excellent de and ee levels (entry 2). For comparison purposes,
conditions B were applied with similar results (entry 3).
A slow racemization of the halogen-containing stereocenter
was initially considered as a possible explanation for the long
reaction times required for completion. Though highly basic
conditions cannot be used, it was found that a slight
modification of the HCO2H/Et3N ratio has a strong influence
in the reaction rate. After a short screening, an optimum 2:1
HCO2H/Et3N ratio was found to accelerate strongly13 the
reduction of 2, affording cis chlorohydrin 7 in 83% yield
and 99% ee (entry 4).
The method was also extended to halogenated tetralones:
conditions B were applied to 2-bromotetralone 3, leading to
bromohydrine 8 with excellent diastero- and enantioselec-
tivity, but in a poor 22% yield (entry 5). Fortunately, a
satisfactory 64% yield with comparable de and ee was
achieved by increasing the amount of n-Bu4NBr to 30 mol
% (entry 6). For the chlorinated analogue 4, both the
“standard” conditions A and the modified phase transfer
conditions B afforded chlorohydrin 9 efficiently (entries 7
and 9), but best results were again observed by decreasing
the HCO2H/Et3N ratio to an optimum of 1.2:1, maintaining
excellent de and ee values in a much faster reaction13 (entry
10).
Experiments were initally performed with 2-bromo- and
2-chloro- indanones and tetralones (()-1-4 as substrates,
using the Noyori/Ikariya [RuCl(TsDPEN)(p-cymene)] cata-
lysts (R,R)- or (S,S)-I (Scheme 2) in 5:2 HCO2H/Et3N
azeotropic mixture as the solvent and hydrogen donor10
(conditions A). The alternative transfer hydrogenations from
2-propanol require a basic medium that would result in the
above-mentioned side reactions at the sensitive R-halogenated
center. On the other hand it was foreseen that the HCO2H/
Et3N system should enable the required enolization of the
substrates by bifunctional acid-basic catalysis under mild
conditions. When this strategy was applied to 2-bromoindan-
1-one 1, however, nucleophilic substitution by formate took
place to afford the undesired product 5 (Scheme 2). Based
in a recent report by Deng and co-workers,11 we performed
the reaction using aqueous HCO2Na as the hydrogen donor
in a biphasic system and n-Bu4NBr (2%) as a phase transfer
(6) (a) Ohkuma, T.; Ishii, D.; Takeno, H.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 6510-6511. (b) Matsumoto, T.; Murayama, T.; Mitsuhashi, T.;
Miura, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 5043-5046 (c) Mohar, B.; Valleix,
A.; Desmurs, J.-R.; Felemez, M.; Wagner, A.; Mioskowski, C. Chem.
Commun. 2001, 2572-2573. (d) Eustache, F.; Dalko, P. I.; Cossy, J. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 1263-1265. (e) Ohkuma, T.; Hattori, T.; Ooka, H.; Inoue,
T.; Noyori, R. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2681-2683. (f) Ohkuma, T.; Li, J.; Noyori,
R. Synlett 2004, 1383-1386.
The specific interest in fluorohydrins1c,14 prompted us to
study also R-fluoro ketones as substrates. Despite the singular
(7) Ros, A.; Magriz, A.; Dietrich, H.; Ford, M.; Ferna´ndez, R.; Lassaletta,
J. M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2005, 374, 1917-1920.
(8) (a) Ben, R. N.; Durst, T. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7700-7706. (b)
Kubo, A.; Kubota, H.; Takahashi, M.; Nunami, K.-i. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 5830-5837. (c) Camps, P.; Pe´rez, F.; Soldevilla, N. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1998, 9, 2065-2079. (d) Caddick, S.; Afonso, C. A. M.;
Candeias, S. X.; Hitchcock, P. B.; Jenkins, K.; Murtagh, L.; Pardoe, D.;
Gil Santos, A.; Treweeke, N.; Weaving, R. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 6589-
6605.
(9) (a) Geneˆt, J. P.; Cano de Andrade, M. C.; Ratovelomanana-Vidal,
V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 2063-2066. (b) Sayo, N.; Sano, N.;
Kumobayashi, H. EP 519763A2, 1992.
(10) Fujii, A.; Hashiguchi, S.; Uematsu, N.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2521-2522.
(11) Ma, Y.; Liu, H.; Chen, L.; Cui, X.; Zhu, J.; Deng, J. Org. Lett.
2003, 12, 2103-2106.
(12) The asymmetric Rh-catalized transfer hydrogenation of chloromethyl
ketones, unable to suffer â-eliminations, can also be performed in a similar
reaction medium: (a) Hamada, T.; Torii, T.; Izawa, K.; Noyori, R.; Ikariya,
T. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4373-4376. (b) Hamada, T.; Torii, T.; Izawa, K.;
Ikariya, T. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 7411-7417.
(13) Comparison with the results reported in ref 10 reveals that the
reactions are even faster than for nonhalogenated analogues. Therefore, the
results cannot be solely explained in terms of a faster enolization of the
substrates. For a very recent study of the effect of pH in asymmetric transfer
hydrogenation of ketones in aqueous media, see: Wu, X.; Li, X.; King, F.;
Xiao, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3407-3411.
(14) (a) Maienfisch, P.; Hall, R. G. Chimia 2004, 58, 93-99. (b) Fluorine
in the Life Sciences (Special issue). ChemBioChem 2004, 5, 557-726.
128
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 1, 2006