Chemistry Letters 2000
205
intentively protected as benzyl ester to challenge the sponta-
neous diketopiperazine formation. A 48% yield was still
obtained during the synthesis of Fmoc-MeLeu-MeLeu-MeVal-
OBzl by sequential deprotection and coupling of Fmoc-MeLeu-
MeVal-OBzl with Fmoc-MeLeu-OH. According to the report
by Wenger during the synthesis of cyclosporine A using modi-
fied mixed pivalic anhydride method, the same desired tripep-
tide was not obtained at all due to the spontaneous formation of
diketopiperazine.15 To further examine the performance of
reagent BEP in SPPS, The hindered 8-11tetrapeptide of CsA
and the linear undecapeptide of CsO were also synthesized in
solid phase using BEP from Fmoc-MeVal-Wang resin. The
purities of the obtained crude peptides were 95% and ~5%16
respectively.
(1992). b) J. Coste, E. Frerot, and P. Jouin, Tetrahedron
Lett., 32, 1967 (1991).
P. Henklein, M. Beyermann, M. Bienert, and R. Knorr,
“Proceeding of the Twenty-First European Peptide
Symposium” ed. by E. Giralt and D. Andreu, ESCOM,
Science, Leiden, (1991), p. 67.
5
6
Y. Kiso, Y. Fujiwara, T. Kimura, A. Nishitani, and K. Akaji,
Int. J. Pept. Protein Res., 40, 308 (1992).
7
a) L. A. Carpino, A. El-Faham, C. A. Minor, and F.
Albericio, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, 201. b) F.
Albericio, M. Cases, J. Alsina, S. A. Triolo, L. A. Carpino,
and S. A. Kates, Tetrahedron Lett., 38, 4853 (1997). c) L. A.
Carpino, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 4397 (1993). d) L. A.
Carpino and A. El-Faham, J. Org. Chem., 59, 696 (1994).
a) P. Li and J. C. Xu, Tetrahedron Lett., 40, 3605 (1999). b)
P. Li and J. C. Xu, Chem. Lett. 1999, in press. c) P. Li and J.
C. Xu, Tetrahedron Lett., 40, 8301 (1999). d) S. Q. Chen
and J. C. Xu, Tetrahedron Lett., 32, 6711 (1991). e) S. Q.
Chen and J. C. Xu, Tetrahedron Lett., 33, 647 (1992). f) S.
Q. Chen and J. C. Xu, Chin. Chem. Lett., 4, 847 (1993). g)
S. Q. Chen and J. C. Xu, Chin. J. Chem., 13, 175 (1995).
a) H. Balli and F. Kersting, Liebigs Ann. Chem., 647, 1
(1961). b) K. Saigo, M. Usui, and K. Kikuchi, Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn., 50, 1863 (1977). c) T. Mukaiyama, M. Usui, and
E. Shimada, Chem. Lett., 1975, 1045. d) T. Mukaiyama, M.
Usui and K. Saigo, Chem. Lett., 1976, 49. e) E. Bald, K.
Saigo and T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 1975, 1163.
8
9
10 R. M. Wenger, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 24, 77 (1985).
11 P. Jouin, T. Poncet, M-N. Dufour, A. Pantaloni, and B.
Castro, J. Org. Chem., 54, 617 (1989) and references cited
therein.
12 G. R. Pettit, S. B. Singh, D. L. Herald, P. Lloyd-Williams,
D. Kantoci, D. D. Burkett, J. Barkoczy, F. Hogan, and T. R.
Wardlaw, J. Org. Chem., 59, 6287 (1994) and references
cited therein.
We also synthesized the hindered pentapeptide moiety of
dolastatin 15 which was a pseudopeptide bearing promising
antineoplastic activity. The Boc group was used for the Nα-
protection, thus a 57.7% overall yield of the protected pen-
tapeptide was obtained via seven coupling steps. No or little N-
carboxyanhydride formed during peptide coupling using BEP,
although Boc-protected amino acids were more readily convert-
ed into NCA than Cbz- or Fmoc-protected derivatives and
resulted in relatively low yield using halogenerated reagents.13d
In general, the pyridinium type coupling reagent BEP was
shown to be a very efficient coupling reagent for the synthesis
of the hindered peptide containing N-methyl amino acid
residues with fast reaction speed, low racemization and good
yields.
13 a) J. Coste, E. Frerot, and P. Jouin, Tetrahedron Lett., 32,
1967 (1991). b) K. Akaji, N. Kuriyama, and Y. Kiso,
Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 3315 (1994). c) C. Van der Auwera
and M. J. O. Anteunis, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg., 95, 203
(1986). d) J. Coste, E. Frerot, and P. Jouin, J. Org. Chem.,
59, 2437 (1994).
14 Coupling reagent BEP was prepared according to literature9a
1
in 95.2% yield. mp 103-104 °C. H NMR (300 MHz, d6-
acetone) δ 1.69 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 5.01 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H),
8.24 (m, 1H), 8.53-8.57 (m, 2H), 9.32 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H)
ppm. IR (KBr): ν = 3106, 1617, 1571, 1500, 1467, 1296,
1050, 786, 718, 521 cm-1. FAB-MS m/z: 186, 188.
15 a) J. M. Humphrey and A. R. Chamberlin, Chem. Rev., 97,
2243 (1997). b) R. M. Wenger, Helv. Chim. Acta., 66, 2672
(1983).
References and Notes
1
2
3
4
B. Castro, J. R. Dromoy, G. Evin, and C. Selve, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1975, 1219.
V. Dourtoglou, J. C. Ziegler, and B. Gross, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1978, 1269.
J. Coste, D. Le-Nguyen, and B. Castro, Tetrahedron Lett.,
16 UV analysis of the Fmoc deprotection step indicated that the
coupling yield of each step was above 90%. The low purity
of the crude product was most likely that the amide bonds
between N-methyl amino acids in long peptide fragment
were prone to undergo hydrolysis under strong acidic medi-
um.7b
31, 205 (1990).
a) S. Q. Chen and J. C. Xu, Tetrahedron Lett., 33, 647