mechanisms have also been invoked6 to explain the exchange
of guest molecules in Rebek’s sportsballs,7 e.g., spherical
dimeric supermolecules held together by multiple hydrogen
bonds.8,9
acting as a water scavenger, the MgSO4 is probably also
catalyzing imine bond formation. When we repeated this
reaction in CDCl3 with MgSO4 absent, but in the presence
of a catalytic amount of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), 1H NMR
spectroscopy indicated a near-quantitative conversion of the
reactants to C2B4 in less than 1 h. The efficiency of this
reaction indicates that, most likely, it is being thermodynami-
cally driven. In support of this hypothesis, we observed that
the product undergoes slow hydrolysis during silica gel
chromatography, leading to 55% yield of the pure C2B4.
Unfortunately, however, the hemicarcerand octaimine, with
phenethyl feet and m-phenylenediimine (B) bridging units,
is not soluble in the millimolar concentration range in CDCl3,
A recent foray we have made into the realm of molecular
capsules was prompted by the notion that yet another
mechanism might operate during the escape of guests from
hemicarceplexes in which two cavitands are held together
by dynamic covalent bonds.10 There are a number of
reversible covalent bond-making and -breaking processes that
lend themselves to doing reactions on molecular compounds
under thermodynamic control. They include olefin meta-
thesis,11 as well as the formation, and sometimes also the
exchange, of acetals,12 borazaaromatic anhydrides,13 disul-
fides,14 esters,15 hydrazones,16 imines,17 and oximes.18 In this
Letter, we describe how imine exchange (1) can be used to
replace 5-substituted-m-phenylenediamine (5-substituted-
MPD) units by unsubstituted ones (MPD) in hemicarcerand
octaimines and (2) provides a “bar-opening/bar-closing”
mechanism whereby ferrocene (Fc), entrapped in a hemi-
carceplex octaimine, can escape imprisonment from behind
the diimine bars.
1
making detailed H NMR spectroscopic analyses difficult.
We decided that it would be more straightforward to address
this problem, not by chemically modifying the feet of the
cavitands but rather by introducing 5-substituted-MPD (A)
bridging units. One of the attractions of using this approach
to increase the solubility of the hemicarcerand is that a
1
suitable H NMR probe can be introduced (Figure 2) into
Previously, one19 of us has described how the hemicar-
cerand octaimine C2B4 can be made in 45% yield by
condensing 2 equiv of the appropriate cavitand tetraaldehyde
with 4 equiv of m-phenylenediamine (MPD) (Figure 1) in
Figure 2. The 5-substituted-MPD employed in the synthesis of
the hemicarcerand C2A4 portrayed as a graphical representation.
the 5-substituent on B to give A. The 5-substituted-MPD
(A), which was prepared21 in two steps in 70% overall yield
from 3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid, was condensed in CHCl3 with
the same cavitand tetraaldehyde as that used in the synthesis
(9) For molecular capsules formed by metal-ion coordination, see: (a)
Fujita, M.; Oguro, D.; Miyazawa, M.; Oka, H.; Yamaguchi, K.; Ogura, K.
Nature 1995, 378, 469-471. (b) Jacopozzi, P.; Dalcanale, E. Angew Chem.
Int, Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 613-615. (c) Olenyuk, B.; Fechtenko¨tter, A.; Stang,
P. J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton. Trans. 1998, 1707-1728.
(10) Lehn, J.-M. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2455-2463.
Figure 1. The preparation of hemicarcerand C2B4 by eight
successive imine condensations between two molecules of the
cavitand tetraaldehyde with four molecules of MPD.
(11) (a) Marsella, M. J.; Maynard, H. D.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1101-1103. (b) Kidd, T. J.; Leigh, D. A.; Wilson,
A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1599-1600.
C5H5N at ∼65 °C for 4 days. On the other hand, Kaifer et
al.20 have isolated C2B4 in 39% yield by carrying out the
same reaction in CH2Cl2 with added MgSO4 at room
temperature for 6 days. It occurred to us that, in addition to
(12) Davies, A. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 591-594.
(13) Comina, P. J.; Philp, D.; Kariuki, B. M.; Harris, K. D. M. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 2279-2280.
(14) Tam-Chang, S.-W.; Stehouwer, J. S.; Hao, J. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 334-335.
(8) For additional recent examples of hydrogen-bonded supramolecular
capsules, see: (a) Ko¨rner, S. K.; Tucci, F. C.; Rudkevich, M.; Heinz, T.;
Rebek, J., Jr. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 187-195. (b) Grawe, T.; Schrader,
T.; Gurrath, M.; Kraft, A.; Osterod, F. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 29-32. (c)
Kobayashi, K.; Shirasaka, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Sakamoto, S.; Horn, E.;
Furukawa, N. Chem. Commun. 2000, 41-42. (d) Prins, L. J.; Huskens, J.;
de Jong, F.; Timmermann, P.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Nature 1999, 398, 498-
502. (e) Shivanyuk, A.; Paulus, E. F.; Bo¨hmer, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1999, 38, 2906-2909. (f) Chapman, R. G.; Sherman, J. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 9818-9826. (g) MacGillivray, L. R.; Atwood, J. L. Nature
1997, 389, 469-472.
(15) (a) Rowan, S. J.; Sanders, J. K. M. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1407-
1408. (b) Brady, P. A.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1997, 3237-3253. (c) Rowan, S. J.; Reynolds, D. J.; Sanders, J. K. M. J.
Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5804-5814.
(16) Cousins, G. R. L.; Poulsen, S.-A.; Sanders, J. K. M. Chem. Commun.
1999, 1575-1576.
(17) (a) Cantrill, S. J.; Rowan, S. J.; Stoddart, J. F. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
1363-1366. (b) Rowan, S. J.; Stoddart, J. F. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1913-
1916.
(18) Polyakov, V. A.; Nelen, M. I.; Nazarpack-Kandlousy, N.; Ryabov,
A. D.; Eliseev, A. V. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1999, 12, 357-363.
2412
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 16, 2000