Yoshifumi Hachisu et al.
COMMUNICATIONS
Two attempts to make larger rings were met with frus- References and Notes
tration. Aldehyde 20 gave only homo-coupled product
[1] T. Ukai, R. Tanaka, S. Dokawa,J. Pharm. Soc. Jpn. 1943,
63, 269.
[2] a) R. Breslow, Chem. Ind. (London) 1957, 893; b) R.
Breslow, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 3719.
[3] Triazolium salt is also the active catalyst for benzoin-type
reactions; for recent examples of the chiral triazolium
salt-catalyzed enatioselective reactions, see: a) D. En-
ders, T. Balensiefer, Acc. Chem. Res. ACS ASAP, and
references cited therein; b) M. S. Kerr, J. R. de Alaniz,
T. Rovis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10298; c) R. L.
Knight, F. J. Leeper, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin. Trans. 1 1998,
1891.
21 in 69% yield [Scheme 10, Eq. (1)]. Keto-aldehyde
22 provided neither the desired product nor the homo-
coupled product, even at higher temperature.
Although the intramolecular ketone–aldehyde ben-
zoin-forming reaction is not without its limitations, the
mild reaction conditions, tolerance of sensitive function-
alities (including b-hydroxy ketones), operational sim-
plicity, and commercially available catalysts render
this process an attractive means of carbon–carbon
bond formation for the synthesis of complex molecules.
Furthermore, given the long history of this process, in-
cluding extensive mechanistic studies, it is remarkable
that the use of ketones as electrophiles has not been ex-
ploited prior to our work.[16]
[4] J. S. Johnson, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1326.
[5] H. Stetter, Org. Synth. 1984, 62, 170.
´
[6] a) J. Castells, F. Lopez-Calahorra, M. Bassedas, P. Urrios,
Synthesis 1988, 314; b) A. R. Katritzky, D. Cheng, R. P.
Musgrave, Heterocycles 1996, 42, 273; c) J. A. Murry,
D. E. Frantz, A. Soheili, R. Tillyer, E. J. J. Grabowski,
P. J. Reider, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9696.
[7] H. Stetter, H. Kuhlmann, Org. React. (N. Y.) 1991, 40,
407.
Experimental Section
Typical Procedure for the Benzoin-Forming Reaction
[8] a) J. W. Bode, Y. Hachisu, T. Matsuura, K. Suzuki, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3555; b) J. W. Bode, Y. Hachisu, T.
Matsuura, K. Suzuki, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 391; c) T. Mat-
suura, J. W. Bode, Y. Hachisu, K. Suzuki, Synlett 2003,
1746.
2-Hydroxy-2-methyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-naphthalen-1-one (7):
To a solution of keto-aldehyde 6 (104 mg, 0.590 mmol) in t-
BuOH (4.5 mL) was added thiazolium salt 1 (37.5 mg,
0.149 mmol), and the temperature was raised to 408C. To the
resulting suspension was added DBU (18.0 mg, 0.118 mmol)
in t-BuOH (1.5 mL) at this temperature, and stirring was con-
tinued for 2 h. The reaction mixture was poured into saturated
aqueous NH4Cl solution, and the products were extracted with
EtOAc (ꢁ3). The combined organic extracts were washed
with brine, dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated under vacuum.
The residue was purified by flash chromatography (hexane/
EtOAc¼72/28) to afford product 7 as a colorless oil; yield:
92.3 mg (89%); 1H NMR (CDCl3): d¼8.04 (d, 1H, J¼
8.0 Hz), 7.52 (dd, 1H, J¼7.7, 7.5 Hz), 7.35 (dd, 1H, J¼7.7,
8.0 Hz), 7.26 (d, 1H, J¼7.5 Hz), 3.87 (s, 1H), 2.97–3.18 (m,
2H), 2.17–2.31 (m, 2H), 1.40 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): d¼
201.8, 143.4, 134.0, 129.9, 129.0, 128.0, 126.9, 73.6, 35.8, 26.8,
23.9; IR (neat): n¼3489, 3066, 2972, 2933, 2864, 1689, 1603,
[9] Y. Hachisu, J. W. Bode, K. Suzuki, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 8432.
[10] An extensive literature search has uncovered a single ex-
ample of a benzoin-type reaction employing ketone elec-
trophiles, namely the decarboxylative cyclization of 2,6-
dioxoheptanoic acid cited in: H. Dugas, Bioorganic
Chemistry, 3rd edn., Springer, New York, 1996, p. 568.
[11] We have made preliminary efforts to establish the role of
a retro-aldol-benzoin processes as a key pathway for the
apparent preference of intramolecular benzoin-type re-
actions over the corresponding aldol. So far, these ex-
periments have been inconclusive. For example, treat-
ment of aldol 5 under typical benzoin-forming reaction
conditions gave the elimination product (4%) and the re-
covered aldol adduct (94%).
1455, 1371, 1290, 1222, 1155, 1097, 971, 796, 742 cmꢀ1 [15]
.
[12] K. Jaworski, L. L. Smith, J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 545.
[13] P. Yates, S. Stiver, Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 2203.
[14] J. P. Richard, R. W. Nagorski, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 4763.
Supplementary Information
General experimental conditions, preparation and characteri-
zation of compounds 4, 10, 12, 15, and 18.
´
[15] A. Solladie-Cavallo, O. Sedy, M. Salisova, M. Biba, C. J.
´
Welch, L. Nafie, T. Freedman, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2001, 12, 2703.
[16] After submission of this paper, we were informed of an
independent, related by Enders et al. [Synlett, submit-
ted]. We thank Professor Dieter Enders for the kind in-
formation.
Acknowledgements
Partial financial support by 21st Century COE program is grate-
fully acknowledged.
1100
ꢀ 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
asc.wiley-vch.de
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1097–1100