treated with sodium methoxide or sodium ethoxide to afford
cyclization products 2.12 Removal of the ester moiety in 2
by refluxing these â-ketoesters in a mixture of ethanol and
aqueous NaOH (1/1) provided 2,3-dihydropyridones 3 in high
yields. Reduction of 3 was obtained with NaBH4 or
hydrogenation catalyzed by Pd/C under ordinary pressure
in order to reduce both the C-C double bond and the C-O
double bond. Under these conditions it was found that the
reaction either did not occur or gave a complicated mixture.
After some experimentation, we found that under 50 atm at
50 °C the hydrogenation of 3b or 3c provided 4a or 4b as
a single product. Thus, we have established a simple method
to obtain enantiopure 2,6-disubstituted 4-hydroxypiperidines.
The overall yields for these four steps were over 55%.
To assign the stereochemistry of two new stereogenic
centers, we undertook the total synthesis of dendrobate
alkaloid (+)-241D using the present strategy. As shown in
Scheme 2, â-amino ester 6, obtained from ethyl 2E-
Figure 1. Structures of alkaloids possessing 2,4,6-trisubstituted
piperidine moiety.
Scheme 2
of 2,4,5-trisubstituted piperidines.8b Herein we wish to
describe a simple and efficient method for preparing 2,6-
disubstituted 4-hydroxypiperidines and its application to the
synthesis of dendrobate alkaloid (+)-241D and (-)-indolizi-
dine 167B.7,9,10
As outlined in Scheme 1, our approach to 2,6-disubstituted
4-hydroxypiperidines started from enantiopure â-amino esters
Scheme 1
dodecenoate 5 by a known procedure, was condensed with
ethyl acetoacetate and then treated with sodium ethoxide to
afford the cyclic product 7. After removal of the ester moiety
of 7, the generated 2,3-dihydropyridone was hydrogenated
to provide the target molecule.13 Its spectral data were all
identical with those reported. In addition, by converting this
product to the corresponding Mosher ester, we determined
its enantiopurity to be greater than 97%. This synthetic result
indicated that the three substituents in this piperidine are all
cis to each other. Therefore, we could conclude that during
the hydrogenation the active species attack the two double
bonds exclusively from the back face of 2-alkyl or aryl group
of enones 3. It is notable that the present synthetic route
only involves six workup steps to give dendrobate alkaloid
(+)-241D in 46% overall yield and is much more efficient
than those reported by Chenevert,4c Troin4d and their co-
workers.
1, which were conveniently prepared on large scales accord-
ing to Davies’ procedure.11 After 1a and 1b were condensed
with â-ketoesters, the vinylogous urethanes generated were
(11) (a) Davies, S. G.; Ichihara, O. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2,
183. (b) Davies, S. G.; Ichihara, O.; Walters, I. A. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1994, 1141.
(9) Isolation: Aronstam, R. S.; Daly, S. W.; Spande, T. F.; Narayanan,
T. K.; Albuquerque, E. X. Neurochem. Res. 1986, 11, 1227.
(12) (a) Baraldi, P. G.; Simoni, D.; Manfredini, S. Synthesis 1983, 902.
(b) Backer, H. G. O. J. Prakt. Chem. 1961,12, 294.
(10) Synthesis: (a) Polniaszek, R. P.; Belmont, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 1990,
55, 4688. (b) Jefford, C. W.; Tang, Q.; Zaslona, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1991, 113, 3513. (c) Takahata, H.; Bandoh, H.; Momose, T. Heterocycles
1995, 41, 1797. (d) Lee, E.; Li, K. S.; Lim, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
1445. (e) Michael, J. P.; Gravestock, D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 865. (f)
Angle, S. R.; Henry, R. M. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8549.
(13) Selected data: [R]25 +7.2 (c 2.0, MeOH) (lit.4c [R]25 +6.5 (c
D
D
2.0, MeOH); IR (neat) 3271, 3182, 2962, 2921, 2852 cm-1; 1H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.67 (m, 1H), 2.70 (m, 1H), 2.55 (m, 1H), 1.98 (m, 2H),
1.41 (m, 2H), 1.27 (m, 14H), 1.15 (d, J ) 6.2 Hz, 3H), 1.02 (m, 2H), 0.89
(t, J ) 7.0 Hz, 3H); EIMS m/z 241 (M+).
2504
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 16, 2000