Jadhav et al.
Synthesis and Characterization of AlCl3 Impregnated Molybdenum Oxide as Heterogeneous Nano-Catalyst
morphology of prepared catalyst were characterized by FT-
IR, XRD, SEM, EDX, and solid-state NMR spectroscopy.
MoO4(AlCl2ꢀ2 catalyst after successful characterization
applied as heterogeneous catalyst for the Friedel-Crafts
acylation reaction. The present catalytic system showed
100% conversion and achieved 84% yield of respective
acylated product at room temperature using 0.1 equiv.
of catalyst in solvent-free condition. Various acylated
derivatives were prepared by using optimized reaction
condition with MoO4(AlCl2ꢀ2 catalyst at optimized reac-
tion condition. In addition, a proposed mechanism path
100
80
60
40
20
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
way also draw to understand the reaction path way with
MoO4(AlCl2ꢀ2 catalyst. The prepared MoO4(AlCl2ꢀ2 cat-
alyst can be recycled by simple filtration process at end
of the reaction and reused several times without con-
siderable loss of catalytic activity and selectivity. The
results demonstrate that the impregnated MoO4(AlCl2ꢀ2
catalyst is an excellent environmentally benign solid cat-
alyst for the Friedel-Crafts Acylation reaction in ambient
condition.
Cycles
Figure 7. Recyclability test of MoO4(AlCl2ꢀ2 catalyst in Friedel-Crafts
acylation reaction under solvent-free condition.
We believed that the present catalyst could participate in
mechanism in two different ways. In case-I, the Mo6+
present in MoO4(AlCl2ꢀ2 catalyst helps to the formation
of acyl cation from the acid chloride and molybdenum
complex, which on reaction with the aromatic substrate
leads to the formation of the acylated product and Mo+6
is regenerated as showed in case-I. On the other hand, the
AlClx present in the catalyst might be helping to the for-
mation of acylated product in presence of MoO4(AlCl2ꢀ2
catalyst as shown in case-II.
Acknowledgment: This work was supported by Basic
Science Research Program through the National Research
Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of
Education (Grant number: NRF-2013R1A1A2060638) and
2014 Research fund of Myongji University.
Delivered by Publishing Technology to: Chinese University of Hong Kong
IP: 50.35.184.159 On: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:20:22
3.3. Recyclability Test of Heterogeneous
References and Notes
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers
MoO4(AlCl2)2 Catalyst
1. J. Deutsch, A. Trunschke, D. Muller, V. Quaschning, E. Kemnitz,
and H. Lieske, Catal. Lett. 88, 9 (2003).
Catalyst reusability is one of the important factors for eco-
nomical operation for organic transformation using het-
erogeneous catalyst, as this can allow reduction in the
operating cost and environmental pollution. After first run
of Friedel-Crafts acylation reaction, catalyst was removed
from the reaction mixture by filtration process. The filtered
catalyst was reused directly after washing with ethanol.
Catalyst was reused for the next six cycles with the
same reaction parameters which were used for fresh cat-
alyst assisted acylation reaction. The results of catalyst
reusability study has been depicted in Figure 7 and it
was found that almost similar yield can be obtained up to
fourth run i.e., acylated yield only marginally decreased
from 84 to 78%. After the fifth run, catalyst activity
started decreasing significantly and 62% yield of respec-
tive product was obtained in sixth run. Hence, the cat-
alyst is efficiently recycled for up-to six cycles without
considerable loss in its catalytic activity and selectivity
in the Friedel-Crafts acylation reaction under solvent-free
condition.
2. C. Khatri, D. Jain, and A. Rani, Fuel 89, 3853 (2010).
3. S. Dasgupta and B. Torok, Curr. Org. Synth. 5, 321 (2008).
4. I. V. Kozhevnikov, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 256, 3 (2003).
5. A. Kawada, S. Mitamura, and S. J. Kobayashi, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 183, 1157 (1993).
6. S. A. Babu, M. Yasuda, and A. Baba, Org. Lett. 9, 405 (2007).
7. Y. Nishimoto, S. A. Babu, M. Yasuda, and A. Baba, J. Org. Chem.
73, 9465 (2008).
8. G. Sartori and R. Maggi, Chem. Rev. 111, 181 (2011).
9. W. Bonrath, F. Aquino, A. Haas, S. Hoppmann, T. Netscher, F. Pace,
and H. Pauling, Sustainability 1, 161 (2009).
10. C. L. Roux and J. Dubac, Synlett. 2, 181 (2002).
11. G. Losfeld, C. Escande, P. Vidal de La Blache, L. Huillier, and
C. Grison, Catal. Today 189, 111 (2012).
12. B. C. Ranu, K. Ghosh, and U. Jana, J. Org. Chem. 61, 9546
(1996).
13. T. Mukaiyama, K. Suzuki, J. S. Han, and S. Kobayashi, Chem. Lett.
21, 435 (1992).
14. G. D. Yadav and A. V. Joshi, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 4, 157
(2002).
15. B. Yuan, Z. Li, Y. Liu, and S. Zhang, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
280, 210 (2008).
16. H. Schuster and W. F. Holderich, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 350, 1
(2008).
17. J. Deutsch, V. Quaschning, E. Kemnitz, A. Auroux, H. Ehwald, and
H. Lieske, Top. Catal. 13, 281 (2000).
18. M. A. Harmer and Q. Sun, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 221, 45 (2001).
19. L. A. M. Cardoso, W. Alves Jr., A. R. E. Gonzaga, L. M. G.
Aguiar, and H. M. C. Andrade, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 209, 189
(2004).
4. CONCLUSIONS
Aluminum trichloride (AlCl3ꢀ impregnated molybdenum
oxide heterogeneous nano-catalyst was prepared success-
fully by using simple impregnation method. Properties and
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 15, 8243–8250, 2015
8249