3170
G. Navarrete-Vazquez et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 3168–3171
maniasis, from which approximately 500,000 belong to the visceral
form, which is potentially fatal.18
anide and the lack of nitro reduction as part of its mechanism of
action, make it an important exception.23,24
In vitro antileishmanial assay was carried out using a method
In conclusion, we have synthesized and screened the in vitro
antiprotozoal activities of two new NIT and TIZ benzologues. This
study demonstrated that the insertion of benzene ring between
the NIT pharmacophore region (nitro and thiazole), have generated
a new antiprotozoal scaffold. Compound 1 (benzologue of NIT),
previously described.12,18 Compound 1 had an excellent activity
against this kinetoplastid protozoa (IC50 = 1.350 lM). It was 4.5-
times more active than NIT and TIZ. The last two drugs were pre-
viously reported by our group as potential new antikinetoplastid
parasite compounds.18 Pentamidine (second-line antileishmanial
drug) was used as positive control. In this research, compound 1
was almost 10-times more potent than pentamidine against prom-
astigotes of L. mexicana. Compound 2 was inactive against this
protozoan.
American trypanosomiasis or Chagas’ disease, caused by its eti-
ological agent T. cruzi, is still one of the major causes of morbidity
and mortality due to cardiovascular diseases in Latin America.18
In vitro trypanocidal assay was performed using a technique
previously reported.12,18 Compound 1 was four-times more active
than NIT and TIZ, which were twofold more potent than benzni-
dazole (first-line antichagasic drug). Compound 1 was seven-times
more active than benznidazole against epimastigotes of T. cruzi.
Compound 2 did not show activity in this assay.
Malaria continues to be a major health challenge in most trop-
ical and many subtropical regions. It is caused by protozoan para-
sites of the genus Plasmodium. The rodent malaria parasite, P.
berghei, is a useful model to screen new antimalarial drugs.19 Cul-
tured schizonts of P. berghei were used to assess antimalarial activ-
ity of compounds and were prepared following the protocol
described previously.12,20,21 We evaluated the antiplasmodial
activity of compounds 1 and 2, which were as active as pentami-
dine (a known plasmocidal drug). NIT and TIZ showed micromolar
showed high bioactivity against all parasites tested (IC50’s <5 lM)
and low cytotoxic effect. The obtained results are very promising
since compound 1 exhibited higher bioactivity than NIT, TIZ, ben-
znidazole and pentamidine especially towards G. intestinalis, L.
mexicana, T. cruzi and P. berghei. Compound 1 could be considered
as a new broad spectrum antiprotozoal agent. Further optimization
of new series and pharmacokinetic characterization of both com-
pounds are in progress in our laboratory.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by internal funds from Facul-
tad de Farmacia, UAEM. We are in debt to Johnatan Cauich Chan
from the UADY, for his technical assistance during antiprotozoal
susceptibility assays.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
activity (IC50 = 3.890 and 5.240
ment of P. berghei. Benznidazole (trypanocidal drug) also showed
good potency (IC50 = 4.070 M) in this assay. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the first study reporting the in vitro activity of
NIT, TIZ and benznidazole, against P. berghei.
lM) against schizonts develop-
1. Pink, R.; Hudson, A.; Marie-Annick, M.; Bendig, M. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2005, 4,
727.
2. Argüello-García, R.; Cruz-Soto, M.; Romero-Montoya, L.; Ortega-Pierres, G.
Infect. Genet. Evol. 2009, 9, 1057.
l
3. Soares, M. B. Curr. Drug Targets 2009, 10, 176.
4. Rossignol, J. F.; Cavier, R. Chem. Abstr. 1975, 83, 28216.
5. Broekhuysen, J.; Stockis, A.; Lins, R. L.; De Graeve, J.; Rossignol, J. F. Int. J. Clin.
Pharmacol. Ther. 2000, 38, 387.
Compounds 1 and 2 were evaluated for their cytotoxicity
against mammalian VERO cell line,12,22 showing a median cyto-
6. Ballard, T. E.; Wang, X.; Olekhnovich, I.; Koerner, T.; Seymour, C.; Hoffman, P. S.;
Macdonald, T. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3537.
7. Tchouaffi-Nana, F.; Ballard, T. E.; Cary, C. H.; Macdonald, T. L.; Sifri, C. D.;
Hoffman, P. S. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 2767.
8. Rossignol, J.-F.; Elfert, A.; El-Gohary, Y.; Keeffe, E. B. Gastroenterology 2009, 136,
856.
9. Rossignol, J. F. O.; La Frazia, S.; Chiappa, L.; Ciucci, A.; Santoro, M. G. J. Biol.
Chem. 2009, 284, 29798.
10. , 3rdThe Practice of Medicinal Chemistry; Wermuth, C. G., Ed.; Academic Press:
London, 2008; pp 283–287.
toxic concentration (CC50) of 683 and 607 lM, respectively (Table
1). NIT showed also low cytotoxicity, meanwhile TIZ and metroni-
dazole showed moderated toxicity against VERO cell line, com-
pared with 1, 2 and NIT. It is interesting to note that the most
cytotoxic compounds were pentamidine and benznidazole, with
CC50 of 47 and 14 lM, respectively.
The selectivity index (SI) of the compounds, defined as the ratio
of cytotoxicity to biological activity (SI = CC50VERO cells/IC50 para-
sites) was calculated (Table 2).
It is generally considered that biological efficacy is not due to
in vitro cytotoxicity when SI P 10.22 Compound 1 showed a nano-
molar giardicidal effect, having a selectivity index of 2300. The SI
calculated for this compound versus all protozoa was >140, this
fact implies that exist a real selective toxicity of 1 against the pro-
tozoa, over the mammalian cells.
11. 2-{[(6-Nitro-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl)amino]carbonyl}phenyl
acetate
(1).
Recrystallized from ethanol. Yield: 73%, mp: 300–303.5 °C. 1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO) d: 2.25 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.03 (t, 1H, H-5, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.08 (d,
1H, H-30, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.52 (td, 1H, H-40, J = 1.7, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.88 (d, 1H, H-4,
J = 8.9 Hz), 7.98 (dd, 1H, H-60, J = 1.7, J = 8.2 Hz), 8.31 (dd, 1H, H-5, J = 2.4,
J = 8.9 Hz), 9.10 (d, 1H, H-7, J = 2.4 Hz), 12.76 (br s, 1H, NH) ppm. 13C NMR
(100 MHz, DMSO) d: 22.9 (CH3), 117.3 (C-30), 119.1 (C-7), 120.6 (C-4), 121.8 (C-
5), 122.0 (C-10), 130.6 (C-6), 132.2 (C-40, 135.0 (C-60), 135.0 (C-7a), 142.9 (C-50),
143.1 (C-20), 143.1 (C-3a), 153.5 (C-2), 163.5 (NHC@O), 170.2 ((OC@O) ppm;
MS/FAB+: m/z 358 (M+H+). HRMS (FAB+): m/z 358.0497 [M+H]+ (calcd for
16H11N3O5SH+
358.0498).
2-Hydroxy-N-(6-nitro-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl)
Although nitro compound-containing drugs and analogues are
frequently avoid in a drug discovery program due to mutagenic
and potentially toxic side effects, the metabolic stability of nitazox-
C
benzamide (2). Recrystallized from ethanol. Yield: 81%, mp: 317–320.9 °C. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) d: 6.95 (t, 1H, H-5, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.08 (d, 1H, H-30,
J = 7.9 Hz), 7.51 (td, 1H, H-40, J = 1.7, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.87 (d, 1H, H-4, J = 9.2 Hz),
7.97 (dd, 1H, H-60, J = 1.7, J = 7.9 Hz), 8.28 (dd, 1H, H-5, J = 2.5, J = 8.9 Hz), 9.07
(d, 1H, H-7, J = 2.4 Hz), 12.76 (br s, 1H, NH) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO) d:
117.3 (C-30), 119.0 (C-7), 120.6 (C-4), 121.8 (C-5), 122.0 (C-10), 130.6 (C-6),
132.2 (C-40), 135.0 (C-60), 135.0 (C-7a), 142.9 (C-50), 143.1 (C-3a), 153.5 (C-2),
157.5 (C-20), 163.5 (NHC@O) ppm; MS/FAB+: m/z 316 (M+H+). HRMS (FAB+): m/
z 316.0356 [M+H]+ (calcd for C14H12N3O4SH+ 316.0392).
Table 2
Selectivity indexes of 1, 2, NIT and TIZ
Compd G.
intestinalis
T.
E.
L.
T.
P.
12. For more details, see Supplementary data.
13. Cedillo-Rivera, R.; Chávez, B.; González-Robles, A.; Tapia, A.; Yépez-Mulia, L. J.
Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2002, 49, 201.
14. Hernandez-Nuñez, E.; Tlahuext, H.; Moo-Puc, R.; Torres-Gomez, H.; Reyes-
Martınez, R.; Cedillo-Rivera, R.; Nava-Zuazo, C.; Navarrete-Vazquez, G. Eur. J.
Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 2975.
15. Suk, D. H.; Bonnac, L.; Dykstra, C. C.; Pankiewicz, K. W.; Patterson, S. E. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 2064.
vaginalis
histolytica mexicana cruzi
berghei
Selectivity index (SI = CC50/IC50
)
1
2
NIT
TIZ
2300
1029
686
811
283
12250
1839
194
76
1653
316
506
ND
135
63
140
ND
44
282
256
214
74
542
22