hydrolysis of the oxazolone (VII) (kOH = 4.8.10Ϫ3MϪ1secϪ1) is
ten times smaller than that of Ia. The cyclisation reactions of
HO–CH2CH2NPhCO2Ph and of HO–CH2CH2NCH3CO2Ph24
are equally reactive indicating that the replacement of N–CH2–
by NPh is unlikely to be the cause of the enhanced rate of
cyclisation to benzoxalone (VII) compared with that to ben-
zoxazinones (II).
The effective molarity for the reaction of Scheme 6 (Y = X =
H) is ca. 108 M compared with the effective molarity for the
cyclisation to benzoxazinone (IIa from Ia) of 2.105M using the
calculated intermolecular rate constant of Hutchins and Fife.18
The substantial value of the Hammett ρ obtained for Scheme 6
when Y = H3 translates to a βLg of Ϫ0.9 and αLg = 0.53 consist-
ent with advanced fission of the ArO–C bond in the transition
structure of the rate limiting step. Moreover Hegarty et al.25
showed that bond formation is substantially advanced in the
transition structure. The results fit both stepwise and concerted
processes. We propose a concerted displacement mechanism for
the formation of the benzoxazolone (VIII) on the basis of the
present data for the benzoxazinone formation.
ions and substituted phenyl acetate esters has a positive
pXY coefficient (ϩ0.17) and the structure reactivity variation
conforms with the reactivity–selectivity hypothesis. There is no
cogent reason why the reactivity–selectivity hypothesis should
be adhered to except in a reaction where only one bond is
undergoing a major change and there are no concurrent
changes such as solvation or resonance interactions.10 The
results for the benzoxazinone formation contrast with that for
the phenolysis of phenylacetate esters where increasing the
nucleophilicity of nucleophile and leaving group moves the
transition structure towards that of the putative tetrahedral
structure (0,1); the same change in nucleophilicity for the
cyclisation I
II shifts the structure towards the putative
acylium ion structure (1,0).30
It is interesting to speculate on the reason why electron
donating substituents cause the motion of the transition struc-
ture towards the acylium ion structure (1,0). In this case the
acylium ion structure is more stable than that of the acetylium
ion (CH3COϩ) in phenolysis of phenyl acetate esters due to the
adjacent nitrogen. The More O’Ferrall–Jencks map is therefore
more skewed towards the (1,0) coordinate in the benzoxazinone
formation. It is unlikely that the acylium ion structure would be
stabilised by electron donating substituents X or Y. However,
these substituents would decrease the stability of the putative
adduct at (0,1) and thus move the transition structure in a
South–East direction.
Conclusions
This study shows that the base-catalysed cyclisation (Scheme 1)
does not conform to the reactivity–selectivity hypothesis and
involves a concerted displacement reaction at the carbamoyl
centre. Arguments show that a similar concerted mechanism
probably operates for the formation of the benzoxazolone
(Scheme 6). The results add to the substantial body of evidence
that a concerted displacement mechanism is possible at a
carbonyl centre under certain conditions of nucleophile, leaving
group and acyl function.
The kinetics of hydrolysis of esters (I),26 where a nitro group
is substituted para to an hydroxyl function, show enhanced
resonance interaction due to extensive bond formation and
fission in the transition structure. The data indicate that
rehybridisation and bond formation or fission are not syn-
chronous.27 Studies with more than one group capable of
undergoing resonance interactions will be necessary before
further comment is possible on the relative progress of delocal-
isation and bond formation in this reaction.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to a referee for suggesting this collaboration
between the English and Czech laboratories. The work was
carried out with the support of the Ministry of Education of
the Czech Republic, project CI MSM 2531001.
References and notes
1 A. J. Kirby, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem., 1980, 17, 183.
2 T. H. Fife, J. E. C. Hutchins and M. S. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1975, 97, 5878.
3 A. F. Hegarty and L. N. Frost, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1973,
1719.
4 T. H. Fife and J. E. C. Hutchins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 4194.
5 (a) J. Mindl, O. Hrabik, V. Sterba and J. Kavalek, Coll. Czech. Chem.
Commun., 2000, 65, 1262; (b) O. Hrabik, P. Simunek, J. Mindl and
J. Kavalek, Molecules, 2002, 7, 200.
6 A. Albert, The Determination of Ionization Constants: A Practical
Manual, Chapman Hall, London, 2nd edn., 1971.
7 k1 and k2 are the velocity constants of the first and second step of the
reaction, A∞, A0 are the absorbances at the end and at the beginning
of the reaction, AB is the absorbance that characterizes the
intermediate. (a) W. G. Jackson, J. M. Harrowfield and P. D. Vowles,
Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 1977, 9, 535; (b) O. Pytela: Chemometrie,
University Press, Pardubice, 2000, p. 108.
Scheme 6
8 D. A. Jencks and W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977, 99, 7948.
9 A. Williams, Concerted Organic and Bio-Organic Mechanisms,
CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000.
10 G. S. Hammond, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1955, 77, 334.
11 (a) I. Lee, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1990, 19, 317; (b) I. Lee, Adv. Phys. Org.
Chem., 1992, 27, 57.
12 (a) S. A. Ba-Saif, K. Luthra and A. Williams, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1989, 111, 2647; (b) S. A. Ba-Saif, K. Luthra and A. Williams,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 6362; (c) S. A. Ba-Saif, M. Colthurst,
Reactivity–selectivity hypothesis
The increase in reactivity as a function of X or Y is associated
with an increase in selectivity (Fig. 3) and this is manifested in
the sign of the Cordes–Thornton coefficient, Ϫ0.179).8,11,28 The
variation of reactivity with structure does not conform with the
reactivity–selectivity hypothesis.10,29 In contrast the inter-
molecular displacement reaction between substituted phenolate
O r g . B i o m o l . C h e m . , 2 0 0 3 , 1, 4 1 5 – 4 2 1
420