Anaesthesia, 2003, 58, pages 280–300
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Correspondence
learning curve. Intensive Care Medicine
2002; 28: 59–62.
(14/220) – 8 bleeds, 1 subcutaneous
emphysema, 1 posterior tracheal wall
injury, 2 difficult insertions, 1 cuff leak,
1 procedure abandoned.
oscillating the tube to ensure that the
needle has not impaled the tube. In our
opinion, it does not constitute a major
problem either.
5 Johnson JL, Cheatham ML, Sagraves
SG, Block EF, Nelson LD. Percutane-
ous dilational tracheostomy: a compar-
ison of single- versus multiple-dilator
techniques. Critical Care Medicine 2001;
29: 1251–4.
We agree with the authors that
procedure time is not important in the
performance of a percutaneous trache-
ostomy – safety is paramount, not
speed. We would therefore ask why
they, like several others, have timed
their procedures? [5]. They also state
that the use of a Crile’s forceps for blunt
dissection shortened their procedure
time. Is this either statistically significant
or clinically relevant? The use of blunt
dissection increases tissue trauma,
increasing the incidence of bleeding
and wound infection and so is not part
of the procedure in our ICU. For easier
passage of the dilator, we recommend
maintaining the wet conditions on the
hydrophilic coating during insertion
and an adequate initial incision. We
wish the authors continued success with
the Blue RhinoTM technique of percu-
taneous tracheostomy, and I expect that
their complication rate will fall as they
gain experience. We strongly advise
them, however, to abandon blunt dis-
section and learn to push a little harder
with the dilator!
Timing of the procedure. We agree that
this is usually not very important and is
influenced, for example, by the
procedure being performed by less
A reply
experienced
colleagues
under
We thank Drs Morgan and Roberts for
their interest in our study. Dealing with
the points raised sequentially:
supervision, as is often the case in a
teaching hospital like ours. But
sometimes the duration of the
procedure, and particularly the time
that the patient is not adequately
ventilated, may be critical in patients
with severe respiratory difficulties. Also
in emergency situations, percutaneous
techniques may be used [4,5]. In those
circumstances, the fastest procedure may
be desirable [6]. Therefore, timing of the
procedure was and is of interest.
Minor and major complications. We care-
fully registered all the problems we
encountered, even those problems that
were easily overcome. We defined major
complications as those requiring surgical
or medical intervention. Posterior wall
puncture, seen at bronchoscopy, in this
context constitutes a minor event. The
use of bronchoscopy creates a direct view
of the posterior tracheal wall. In cases of
imminent puncture of the posterior
tracheal wall, puncture can be avoided.
This is the main reason why we routinely
advocate bronchoscopy [1]. We choose
to speak of ÔpunctureÕ and not of Ôper-
forationÕ, which can be devastating [2]. It
is important to note that this would
remain unrecognised without perform-
ing bronchoscopy. Pneumothorax only
can happen if the puncture is off the
midline and perforates the posterior
tracheal wall. Understandably, we always
take precautions to avoid accidental
extubation, but it is only a real problem
in cases of difficult intubation. The two
patients where accidental extubation has
happened were easily re-intubated. The
only case where subcutaneous emphys-
ema was impressive was related to the use
of a fenestrated tube [3]. With appropri-
ate measures, the emphysema disap-
peared within several hours, so we deci-
ded to define this as an annoying, but
minor, complication because there were
no residual problems for the patient.
Difficulties in introducing the cannula
were encountered twice and were rela-
ted to the transition from obturator to
cannula-tip. As discussed, the diameter of
a Shiley-cannula is relatively large, ma-
king introduction sometimes difficult,
but not impossible. Puncture of the
tracheal tube is a well known problem,
which is diagnosed easily by rotating and
Blunt dissection. This is not always
necessary. However, the use of the
Crile’s forceps was in many cases clin-
ically important. We always perform
blunt dissection in the midline, avoiding
blood vessels lying more laterally. Iden-
tification of the trachea, by digital
palpation, was a lot easier, so the
puncture was easier and the time of
compromised ventilation was therefore
shorter than before the use of the Crile’s
forceps. Many other authors using the
multiple dilators technique, and even
Ciagla in his original paper, advocate
the use of some blunt dissection and so
do several authors using the Blue Rhino
technique [7–10].
We appreciate the good wishes of
Drs Morgan and Roberts, but we want
to stress that the meticulous way we
prospectively registered our peri-opera-
tive complications makes our survey
difficult to compare with registrations
not done in the context of research.
P. Morgan
R.G. Roberts
University Hospital of Wales,
Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK
References
1 Dulguerov P, Gysin C, Perneger TV,
Chevrolet JC. Percutaneous or surgical
tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Critical
Care Medicine 1999; 27: 1617–25.
2 Massick DD, Yao S, Powell DM, et al.
Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive
care unit: a prospective randomized trial
comparing open surgical tracheostomy
with endoscopically guided percutane-
ous dilational tracheotomy. Laryngoscope
2001; 111: 494–500.
B. G. Fikkers
J. M. M. Verwiel
3 Bowen CP, Whitney LR, Truwit JD,
Durbin CG, Moore MM. Comparison
of safety and cost of percutaneous ver-
sus surgical tracheostomy. American
Surgeon 2001; 67: 54–60.
F. J. A. van den Hoogen
University Medical Center Nijmegen,
6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
E-mail: b.fikkers@ic.umcn.nl
4 Beiderlinden M, Karl Walz M, Sander
A, Groeben H, Peters Complications of
bronchoscopically guided percutaneous
dilational tracheostomy: beyond the
References
1 van Heerbeek N, Fikkers BG, van den
Hoogen FJ. False passage during
Ó 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
287