the K1+1 value at 1022 M of Bu4NClO4 clearly showed a smaller
effect in comparison to NaClO4 at the same concentration
(pK1+1 = 5.22 ± 0.08 and 4.56 ± 0.03 for Bu4NClO4 and
NaClO4 respectively). Therefore, it can be concluded that
addition of inert salts, as much as 4500 times the concentration
of the building blocks, only reduces the stability of the complex
by a factor of 10.
Finally, we have found that the influence of the presence of
water on the stability of the assemblies is very small. The log
K1+1 value is 6.04 ± 0.02 in a H2O–DMPU mixture (xwater
=
0.26), which is comparable to the value of 6.16 ± 0.01 obtained
in pure DMPU (see Table 1).
In conclusion we have shown that stable cage-like complexes
are obtained by self-assembly of cationic porphyrins and
anionic calix[4]arenes in polar solvents. These assemblies are
formed as a result of multiple electrostatic interactions between
oppositely charged building blocks and are highly stable in
polar solvents, like MeOH DMSO and DMPU. Furthermore,
they remain stable even in the presence of water and, to a large
extent, upon the addition of electrolytes.
Fig. 2 1H NMR of (A) porphyrin 1a, (B) 1:1 mixture of 1a and 2 at 298 K,
(C) 1:1 mixture of 1a and 2 at 343 K.
These investigations are supported by the Netherlands
Research Council for Chemical Sciences (CW) with financial
aid from the Technology Foundation STW.
main driving force for the formation of the highly stable ion-pair
complexes 1·2 in MeOH.15
Structural investigation of complex 1a·2 by 1H NMR
spectroscopy was performed in CD3CN–D2O (6.5+1.5). At
ambient temperatures the porphyrin proton signals show a
complicated set of signals that indicate the presence of a mixture
of isomeric structures with reduced symmetry. The calix[4]ar-
ene strongly influences the atropoisomerization equilibrium of
the porphyrin,5 without inducing a particular conformational
preference. Coalescence of the various signals occurs at higher
temperatures, whereby the position of the averaged signals is
significantly shifted upfield in comparison to the corresponding
signals in the free porphyrin. The largest shifts are observed for
protons Hb, Hc and Hd (0.3–0.7 ppm) (see Fig. 2), which
suggests that these protons are located in closest proximity to
the calix[4]arene unit. Molecular simulation studies
(CHARMm 24.0) support this view and further show that the
structure in which the alkyl chains are pointing away from the
calix[4]arene minimizes the distance between opposite charges
in the two building blocks.¶
Notes and references
‡ DMPU = 1,3-dimethyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-2(1H)-one).
§ Self-assembled molecular capsules formed by means of ionic interactions
have been reported using cyclotriveratrylene building blocks16 or cyclodex-
trin derivatives.17 In the first case the authors did not report the formation
constant for the 1+1 complex and they observed the presence of oligomers
at 7 mM in DMSO-d6. In the paper dealing with cyclodextrins indirect proof
for the existence of the capsules was obtained from the calculation of self-
diffusion coefficients via 1H NMR techniques.
¶ The symmetrical situation as observed from a gas-phase simulation (see
ESI) is likely reflecting the structure of the complex at temperatures higher
than rt.
∑ Coordination of MeOH to zinc(II) porphyrin hosts have been observed in
several cases.18
1 J. P. Collman and L. Fu, Acc. Chem. Res., 1999, 32, 455.
2 N. Bampos, V. Marvaud and J. K. M. Sanders, Chem. Eur. J., 1998, 4,
335.
3 H. L. Anderson and K. M. Sanders, Angew. Chem., Int Ed. Engl., 1990,
29, 1400.
The cage-like structure of these ion-pair complexes prompted
us to study their formation in other polar solvents such as
DMSO and DMPU, from which the individual molecules are
more bulky than MeOH. Titration experiments with 1a and 2 in
these solvents also gave well-defined isosbestic spectral
variations. However, no shift in the maximum (DMSO) or a 5
nm blue shift (DMPU) was observed. This indicates a different
solvation shell around the porphyrin upon formation of the
complex in these solvents. Moreover, the K1+1 values are one
order of magnitude smaller than in MeOH (Table 1), which
might indicate that MeOH is probably a very good guest for the
cage-like complex∑ and enhances the stability of the system.
Further experiments on solvent or guest encapsulation in these
cage-like structures are currently ongoing in our laboratories.
Furthermore, we examined the effect of adding salts on the
stability of the ion-pair complexes: association constants were
determined for assembly 1a·2 in DMSO at different concentra-
tions of NaClO4. A logarithmic plot of K1+1 and [NaClO4]
shows a bimodal linear relationship with a slope of 1.91 ± 0.11
for [NaClO4] > 2 3 1023 M. This behavior suggests that, at
high concentrations of Na+, calix[4]arene 2 complexes two Na+
ions in a cooperative fashion, as indicated by the sharp curvature
at the breaking point, with b = 2.2 105 M22. Determination of
4 T. Mizutani, T. Murakami, T. Kurahashi and H. Ogoshi, J. Org. Chem.,
1996, 61, 539.
5 T. Mizutani, T. Horiguchi, H. Koyama, I. Uratani and H. Ogoshi, Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1998, 71, 413.
6 M. Sirish and H.-J. Schneider, Chem. Commun., 1999, 907.
7 J. P. Collman, J. I. Brauman, B. Meunier, T. Hayashi, T. Kodadek and
S. A. Raybuck, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 2000.
8 J. Bernadou and B. Meunier, Chem. Commun., 1998, 2167.
9 Cytochrome P-450: Structure, Mechanism and Biochemistry, ed. P. R.
Ortiz de Montellano, Plenum Press, New York, 2nd edn., 1995.
10 Peroxidases in Chemistry and Biology, ed. J. Everse, K. E. Everse and
M. P. Grisham, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1991, vol. I and II.
11 D. Liu, D. A. Williamson, M. L. Kennedy, T. D. Williams, M. M.
Morton and D. R. Benson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 11 798.
12 D. M. Rudkevich, W. Verboom and D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Org. Chem.,
1995, 60, 6585.
13 A. Casnati, Y. Ting, D. Berti, M. Fabbi, A. Pochini, R. Ungaro, D.
Sciotto and G. G. Lombardo, Tetrahedron, 1993, 49, 9815.
14 H.-J. Schneider and M. Wang, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 7464.
15 B. Linton and A. D. Hamilton, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 6027.
16 S. B. Lee and J.-I. Hong, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 8501.
17 B. Hamelin, L. Jullien, C. Derouet, C. Hervé du Penhoat and P.
Berthault, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 8438.
18 R. P. Bonar-Law and J. K. M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117,
259.
2314
Chem. Commun., 2000, 2313–2314