F. Nagatsugi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 343±345
345
It is clearly shown that 1-bearing ODN (9) produces no
Acknowledgements
adducts with any target site (Fig. 3, A). On the other
hand, 2-bearing ODN (8a) reacted only to the cytidine
within the pyrimidine strand and did not produce any
adducts with other target sites (Fig. 3, B, lane 6). All
ODN combinations using 7, 10 and 11 showed triplex
melting temperatures higher than 45 ꢀC, indicating that
the major part of them are in triplex form under the
reaction temperature at 30 ꢀC. Thus, it is clear that the
selectivity is not due to dierence in triplex stability.
These results indicated that 2 exhibited high selectivity
to cytidine only at the target site of the pyrimidine
strand (11) of the duplex, and that the reaction of the 2-
amino-6-vinylpurine motif needs precise proximity with
the target cytidine. A similar selective reaction to the
cytidine in the pyrimidine strand (11) was also obtained
with the TFO 8b incorporating the phenylsulfoxide
derivative of 2. Considering that the pyrimidine strand
(11) contains ®ve cytidines as possible reaction sites, the
high selectivity achieved by 2-bearing ODN (8a) is
remarkable. The high selectivity is probably ascribed to
the complex formation between 2 and the ¯ipping-cyti-
dine as we anticipated in the molecular design of 2. This
speculation has been supported by the fact that higher
yields of the cross-linking reactions were obtained with
duplexes containing the mismatch pairs (X±Y in 10ꢁ 11:
A±C or T±C), in which a higher ratio of the ¯ipping-
cytidine was expected compared to a matched G±C pair.
That is, the yield of cross-linked products increased
from 25% for G±C (a match pair) to 40% for A±C and
T±C (a mismatch pair). As it is clear from the estima-
tion with the electrophoresis using nature gel that the
duplex containing a mismatch pair of A±C or T±C is
only slightly less stable than that with a G±C pair at
room temperature, increase in the cross-linking yield
may be attributable to a higher ratio of the ¯ipping
cytidine of these mismatch pairs. In contrast, lower
cross-linking yield of 16% was obtained at the C±C
mismatch site probably due to thermal instability of the
duplex containing the C±C mismatch as evidenced by
the electrophoresis.14
The authors are grateful for support by Grant-in-Aid
for Scienti®c Research on Priority Area (A), Area No.
404 to SS and for Young Scientist to FN from the Min-
istry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan.
References
1. Woolf, T. M. Nature Biotech. 1998, 16, 341 and references
cited therein.
2. References cited in a review, Herdewijn, P. Antisense &
Nucleic Acid Drug Development 2000, 10, 297.
3. (a) Wang, G.; Lwvy, D. D.; Seidman, M. M.; Glazer, P. M.
Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15, 1759. (b) Faruqi, A. F.; Krawczyk,
S. H.; Matteucci, M. D.; Glazer, P. M. Nucleic Acids Res.
1997, 25, 633.
4. (a) Povsic, T. J.; Strobel, S. A.; Dervan, P. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 5934. (b) Povsic, T. J.; Dervan, P. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 9428. (c) Grant, K. B.; Dervan, P. B.
Biochemistry 1996, 35, 12313.
5. (a) Reed, M. W.; Lukhtanov, E. A.; Gorn, V.; Kutyvin, I.;
Gall, A.; Wald, A.; Meyer, R. B. Bioconjugate Chem. 1998, 9,
64. (b) Belousov, E. S.; Ahonina, I. A.; Podyminogin, M. A.;
Gamper, H. B.; Reed, M. W.; Wydro, R. M.; Meyer, R. B.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3440.
6. (a) Reed, M. W.; Wald, A.; Meyer, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 9729. (b) Shaw, J.-P.; Milligan, J. F.; Krawczyk,
S. H.; Matteucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7765.
7. Lukhtanov, E. A.; Mills, A. G.; Kutyavin, I. V.; Gorn,
V. V.; Reed, M. W.; Meyer, R. B. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25,
5077.
8. (a) Nagatsugi, F.; Uemura, K.; Nakashima, S.; Maeda, M.;
Sasaki, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 421. (b) Nagatsugi, F.;
Uemura, K.; Nakashima, S.; Maeda, M.; Sasaki, S. Tetra-
hedron 1997, 53, 3035.
9. (a) Kawasaki, T.; Nagatsugi, F.; Maeda, M.; Sasaki, S.
Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 1999, 42, 43. (b) Nagatsugi,
F.; Kawasaki, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Maeda, M.; Sasaki, S. Nucleic
Acids Symposium Series 1998, 39, 103. c) Nagatsugi, F.;
Kawasaki, T.; Maeda, M.; Sasaki, S. Nucleic Acids Symposium
Series 1997, 37, 67.
10. Nagatsugi, F.; Kawasaki, T.; Usui, D.; Maeda, M.;
Sasaki, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6753.
11. Matsuura, N.; Yashiki, Y.; Nakashima, S.; Maeda, M.;
Sasaki, S. Heterocycles 1999, 51, 975.
12. Kjellberg, J.; Liljenberg, M.; Johansson, N. G. Tetra-
hedron 1986, 42, 6541.
13. Nagai, H.; Fujiwara, T.; Fujii, M.; Sekine, T.; Hata, T.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 21, 8581.
In conclusion, we have successfully demonstrated a
highly selective cross-linking reaction to a ¯ipping cyti-
dine within the triplex using TFO bearing 2-amino-6-
vinylpurine derivatives (2). The selective reactivity of 2
should be useful in application to site-directed mod-
i®cation of a cytidine within a selected target. Further
work is now under way in the search for the appropriate
structure having higher reactivity in the triplex forming
cross-linking reaction.
14. This accords with the reported fact, Peyret, N.; Senevir-
atne, P. A.; Allawi, H. T.; SantaLucia, J., Jr. Biochemistry
1999, 38, 3468.