thiodonor is selectively activated with a mild thiophilic
promotor and condensed with a relatively unreactive (“dis-
armed”) thioglycoside.5 The resulting thio disaccharide can
then be activated by a more potent promotor in the next
glycosidic coupling step, thus obviating the need for elaborate
protecting group manipulations at the oligosaccharide stage.
With the easy availability of a large variety of thioglycosidic
building blocks, progress in oligosaccharide synthesis em-
ploying thioglycosides is highly dependent on the develop-
ment of new thiophilic promotor systems. Thus far, relatively
few efficient activation systems for disarmed thioglycosidic
donors have been reported.6
Recently, a breakthrough in the development of novel
thiophilic promotor systems was reported by Crich et al.,6a
who showed that reaction of S-(4-methoxyphenyl)benzene-
thiosulfinate (MBPT, 1a, Scheme 1) and trifluoromethane-
Figure 1. Glycosyl donors (3-5) and acceptors (6-8) employed
in the Ph2SO/Tf2O mediated couplings.
function in 3a by the more nucleophilic thio(p-methoxyphe-
nyl) group in 3b. MBPT/Tf2O (2a)-mediated condensations
of thiomannoside 3b led to the isolation of a variety of
disaccharides in high yield and stereoselectivity.9 In the
course of these studies, we also explored the application of
the more potent thiophilic promotor system BSP/Tf2O (2b)
in the condensation reactions of phenylthioglycosides. To
our surprise, this promotor system also proved to be unable
to activate mannosazide 3a.10 Even more intriguing, the use
of other disarmed donors such as glucosazide 4 and rham-
nosides 5a/b also did not result in productive BSP/Tf2O (2b)-
mediated glycosylations.
Scheme 1. Activated Sulfonium Species 2a-c, Generated by
Reaction of 1a-c with Triflic Anhydride
sulfonic anhydride (Tf2O) results in sulfonium species 2a,
which was capable of promoting the notoriously difficult
formation of a â-mannosidic linkage in excellent yield and
stereoselectivity. The latter activation procedure could be
improved by using the easily accessible 1-benzenesulfinyl
piperidine (BSP, 1b)/Tf2O system, which, in contrast to 1a/
Tf2O, can also be used for the activation of disarmed
thioglycosides.6b,7
As part of a program aimed at the development of efficient
synthetic strategies toward biologically important oligosac-
charides,8 we investigated the applicability of 1a/b in
combination with Tf2O as promotors in the stereoselective
construction of â-mannosamine linkages. We observed that
activating agent 2a failed to effectuate the condensation of
S-phenyl-2-azido-3-O-benzyl-4,6-di-O-benzylidene thioman-
noside (3a, Figure 1) with a variety of acceptors.9 We could
circumvent this limitation by replacing the thiophenyl
Gin et al. recently reported an innovative dehydrative
glycosylation strategy,11 based on the powerful electrophile
diphenylsulfide bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate) (2c), generated
in situ from diphenyl sulfoxide (1c) and Tf2O. It occurred
to us that 2c, which lacks the nitrogen lone pair stabilization
of 2b, would be a stronger electrophile capable of activating
not only anomeric hydroxyl groups but also the weakly
nucleophilic thiofunction present in disarmed thioglycosides.
The Ph2SO/Tf2O (2c) promotor system was evaluated
using the above-mentioned disarmed donor phenyl thiogly-
cosides 3a, 4, and 5a/b and acceptors 6-8 (Figure 1). Indeed
phenyl thiomannoside 3a was readily activated with diphe-
nylsulfide bis(triflate) at low temperatures (-60 °C) and
condensed with acceptors 6-8 to give disaccharides 9-11,
respectively, in excellent yields (Table 1, entries 1-3).
Condensations of 3a with the relatively unreactive acetylated
glucoside 6 as well as its more reactive benzylated congener
7 both occurred with comparable â-selectivity. The more
stereocongested acceptor 8 was condensed with 3a in equal
efficiency, but with a lower stereoselectivity, as compared
to 6 and 7. Interestingly, smooth activation and glycosidation
(5) (a) Demchenko, A. V.; Malysheva, N. N.; De Meo, C. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 455-458. (b) Zhu, T.; Boons, G.-J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4201-
4203. (c) Fridman, M.; Solomon, D.; Yogev, S.; Baasov, T. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 281-283. (d) Veeneman, G. H.; Van Boom, J. H. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 275-278. See also ref 4b-d.
(6) (a) Crich, D.; Smith, M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4067-4069. (b) Crich,
D.; Smith, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9015-9020. (c) Kartha, K. P.
R.; Aloui, M.; Field, R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 5175-5178. (d)
Ercegovic, T.; Meijer, A.; Magnusson, G.; Ellervik, U. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
913-915.
(7) Crich, D.; Smith, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8867-8869.
(8) (a) Code´e, J. D. C.; Van der Marel, G. A.; Van Boeckel, C. A. A.;
Van Boom, J. H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 3954-3965. (b) Kamst, E.;
Zegelaar-Jaarsveld, K.; Van der Marel, G. A.; Van Boom, J. H.; Lugtenberg,
B. J. J.; Spaink, H. P. Carbohydr. Res. 1999, 321, 176-189. (c) Duynstee,
H.; De Koning, M. C.; Van der Marel, G. A.; Van Boom, J. H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 4129-4132. (d) Timmers, C. M.; Wighert, S. C. M.;
Leeuwenburgh, M. A.; Van der Marel, G. A.; Van boom, J. H. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 1998, 1, 91-97.
(9) Litjens, R. E. J. N.; Leeuwenburgh, M. A.; Van der Marel, G. A.;
Van Boom, J. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8693-8696.
(10) BSP/Tf2O-mediated glycosylations of the more nucleophilic 3b
proceeded uneventfully and with yields and R/â ratios comparable to those
of the MBPT/TF2O system.
(11) (a) Garcia, B. A.; Poole, J. L.; Gin, D. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 7597-7598. (b) Garcia, B. A.; Gin, D. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 4269-4279. (c) Nguyen, H. M.; Poole, J. L.; Gin, D. Y. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 414-417.
1520
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 9, 2003