Unprecedented Behavior of 2,2′:6′,2′′-Terpyridine
Organometallics, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2001 1151
CH3). IR (Nujol, cm-1): νmax 1607(s), 1564(s), 1106(m), 1093-
(s), 1013(s). FAB+-MS (3-nitrobenzyl alcohol matrix): m/z (%)
807(20) [M+], 792(15) [M+ - CH3], 729(30) [M+ - DMSO], 714-
(70) [M+ - CH3 - DMSO], 699(15) [M+ - 2CH3 - DMSO], 651-
(40) [M+ - 2DMSO], 636(100) [M+ - CH3 - 2DMSO], 621(65)
[M+ - 2CH3 - 2DMSO]. Anal. Calcd for C21H27N3O2S2Pt2 (Mr
) 807.81): C 31.22, H 3.38, N 5.20. Found: C 31.39, H 3.40,
N 5.31.
Ta ble 1. Cr ysta llogr a p h ic Da ta
3
formula
C19H15N3O2Pt2
707.53
M
color
orange-red
triclinic
P1h (no. 2)
6.869(1)
10.007(1)
14.821(2)
98.36(1)
103.31(1)
108.39(1)
914.2(2)
2
cryst syst
space group
a/Å
b/Å
c/Å
Compounds 2 and 3 were obtained in almost quantitative
yields by reaction, at room temperature, of a suspension of 1
(ca. 0.1 g) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) with excess acetonitrile (5 mL),
2, and with CO (1 bar), 3, respectively. Compounds 4 and 5
were obtained in almost quantitative yields by reaction of 1
(ca. 0.1 g) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) under argon, with the stoichio-
metric amount of phosphine.
R/deg
â/deg
γ/deg
U/Å3
Z
F(000)
644
Dc/g cm-3
2.57
293
T/K
Com p ou n d 2. Mp: 198 °C (decomposition without melting).
IR (Nujol, cm-1) νmax: 2281(vw), 1602(s), 1562(s). FAB+-MS
cryst dimens (mm)
µ(Mo KR)/cm-1
min. and max. transmn
factors
scan mode
frame width/deg
time per frame/s
no. of frames
detector-sample
distance/cm
θ-range/deg
reciprocal space explored
no. of reflns (total; ind)
Rint
0.04 × 0.10 × 0.45
154.6
m/z (%): 733(10) [M+], 692(10) [M+ - CH3CN], 677(15) [M+
-
CH3 - CH3CN], 662(10) [M+ - 2CH3 - CH3CN], 651(15) [M+
0.51-1.00
ω
0.30
25
2450
5.00
- 2CH3CN], 636(20) [M+ - CH3 - 2CH3CN], 621(20) [M+
2CH3 - 2CH3CN]. Anal. Calcd for C21H21N5Pt2 (Mr ) 733.71):
C 34.38, H 2.89, N 9.55. Found: C 34.20, H 2.75, N 9.45.
-
Com p ou n d 3. Mp: 250 °C (decomposition without melting).
IR (Nujol, cm-1) νmax: 2043(vs), 2030(vs), 1608(m), 1563(m).
Anal. Calcd for C19H15N3O2Pt2 (Mr ) 707.53): C 32.25, H 2.14,
N 5.94. Found: C 32.02, H 2.15, N 5.77.
3-26
( h, ( k, ( l
11 723; 4575
0.048
Com p ou n d 4. Mp: 250 °C (decomposition without melting).
final R2 and R2w indicesa
(F2, all reflns)
conventional R1 index
(I>2σ(I))
reflns with I>2σ(I)
no. of variables
goodness of fitb
0.058, 0.069
4
3
1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.84 (t, 1H, J (H,P) ) 5.4 Hz, J (Pt,H) )
3
48.1 Hz), 8.43 (d, 2H, J (H,H) ) 7.3 Hz), 7.85-7.62 (m, 16H),
0.032
3
7.45-7.30 (m, 18H), 6.58 (m, 2H), 0.86 (d, 6H, J (H,P) ) 7.8
Hz, 2J (Pt,H) ) 84.0 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (121.4 MHz, CDCl3):
2915
235
0.98
δ 33.67 (s, 1J (Pt,P) ) 2133 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3):
δ
165.94 (s), 161.10 (d, J (C,P) ≈ 120 Hz), 161.04 (s), 150.27 (s),
144.08 (t, J (H,P) ≈ 40 Hz), 136.88 (s), 135.12 (d, J (C,P) ) 12.1
Hz), 132.82 (d, J (C,P) ) 42.3 Hz), 129.97 (s), 128.14 (d, J (C,P)
) 9.7 Hz), 122.41 (s), 120.73 (s), -12.18 (d, J (C,P) ) 5.0 Hz).
R2 ) [∑(|Fo2 - kFc |)/∑Fo2], R2w ) [∑w(Fo2 - kFc2)2/∑w(Fo2)2]1/2
.
a
2
[∑w(Fo - kFc2)2/(No - Nv)]1/2, where w ) 4Fo2/σ(Fo2)2, σ(Fo2) )
b
2
[σ2(Fo2) + (0.04Fo2)2]1/2, No is the number of observations and Nv
IR (Nujol, cm-1) νmax
:
1603(s), 1560(m), 694(s). FAB+-MS
the number of variables.
m/z(%): 898(10) [M+ - CH3 - PPh3], 636(10) [M+ - CH3
-
2PPh3], 621(10) [M+ - 2CH3-2PPh3]. Anal. Calcd for C53H45N3P2-
Pt2 (Mr ) 1176.17): C 54.12, H 3.86, N 3.57. Found: C 53.97,
H 3.70, N 3.40.
with the software SAINT,18 and an empirical absorption
correction was applied (SADABS19) to the 11 723 collected
reflections, 4575 of which are unique with Rint ) 0.048 (Rint
)
Com p ou n d 5: Mp: 220 °C (decomposition). 1H NMR (CD2-
2
∑|Fo2 - Fmean |/∑Fo2). Scattering factors and anomalous disper-
sion corrections were taken from ref 20. The calculations were
performed on an AST Power Premium 486/33 computer using
the Personal Structure Determination Package21 and the
physical constants tabulated therein. The structure was solved
by Patterson and Fourier methods and refined by full-matrix
least-squares, using all reflections and minimizing the function
3
4
Cl2): δ 8.74 (d, 2H, J (H,H) ) 5.6 Hz), 8.61 (t, 1H, J (H,P) )
3
3
5.1 Hz, J (Pt,H) ) 42.0 Hz), 8.47 (dd, 2H, J (H,H) ) 7.8 Hz,
4J (H,H) ≈ 1 Hz), 7.92 (td, 2H, J (H,H) ) 7.3 Hz, J (H,H) ≈ 1
3
4
3
4
Hz), 7.21 (td, 2H, J (H,H) ) 5.6 Hz, J (H,H) ≈ 1 Hz), 2.42-
0.82 (m, 72H). 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2) δ: 24.52 (s, J (Pt,P) )
1
1993 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 166.33 (m, J (Pt,C) ) 45.2
Hz; C), 162.05 (dd, J (C,P) ) 113.5 Hz, J (C,P) ) 3.7 Hz; C),
160.43 (s, J (Pt,C) ≈ 19 Hz; C), 152.06 (s; CH), 142.57 (t, J (C,P)
) 39.1 Hz; CH), 137.25 (s; CH), 122.86 (s; CH), 121.10 (s,
J (Pt,C) ) 18.9 Hz; CH), 32.77 (d, J (C,P) ) 20.1 Hz; CH), 30.23
(s; CH2), 28.32 (d, J (C,P) ) 9.8 Hz; CH2), 27.01 (s; CH2), -16.11
2
2
∑w(Fo - k|Fc| )2 (refinement on F2). Anisotropic thermal
factors were refined for all the non-hydrogen atoms. The
hydrogen atoms of the methyl groups were detected in the final
Fourier maps and not refined. All the other hydrogen atoms
were placed in their ideal positions (C-H ) 0.97 Å, B 1.10
times that of the carbon atom to which they are attached) and
not refined. The final Fourier map shows a maximum residual
of 2.1(5) e/Å3 at 0.96 Å from Pt(1). The atomic coordinates of
the structure model have been deposited with the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre.
(d, J (C,P) ) 7.3 Hz, J (Pt,C) ) 762.4 Hz; CH3). IR (Nujol, cm-1
)
ν
max: 1602(s), 1560(m). Anal. Calcd for C53H81N3P2Pt2 (Mr )
1212.47): C 52.50, H 6.75, N 3.47. Found: C 52.70, H 6.61, N
3.31.
X-r a y Da ta Collection s a n d Str u ctu r e Deter m in a tion s.
Crystal data and other experimental details are summarized
in Table 1. The diffraction experiment was carried out on a
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer at room
temperature using Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.71073 Å) with a
graphite crystal monochromator in the incident beam. Cell
parameters and orientation matrix were obtained from the
least-squares refinement of 55 reflections measured in three
different sets of 15 frames each, in the range 3° < θ < 23°. At
the end of data collections the first 50 frames, containing 89
reflections, were recollected to have a monitoring of crystal
decay, which was not observed, so that no time-decay correc-
tion was needed. The 2450 collected frames were processed
Ack n ow led gm en t. Financial support from the Uni-
versita` di Sassari is gratefully acknowledged. A.D.
(18) SAINT, Reference manual; Siemens Energy and Automation:
Madison, WI, 1994-1996.
(19) Sheldrick, G. M. SADABS, Empirical Absorption Correction
Program; University of Gottingen, 1997.
(20) International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, Vol. 4; Kynoch
Press: Birmingham, 1974.
(21) Frenz, B. A. Comput. Phys. 1988, 2, 42. Crystallographic
Computing 5; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1991; Chapter 11, p
126.